The Hugo nominations deadline is three days away – I’ve filled up my ballot for the 2018 awards, but still have some gaps for the 1943 Retro Hugos, and I’m terribly afraid they’re going to stay gappy.
It’s almost as if, I dunno, people were being distracted, somehow. As if something was happening, somewhere in the world, that took attention and resources away from SF. Can’t imagine what it might have been, can you?
So, yeah. With a whole lot of SF writers being of military age, and vanishing into the armed forces or into other, more recondite branches of the war effort, there’s significantly less stuff to choose from in 1942 than there was in 1940. So much less, in fact, that there are some areas I’m forced to leave entirely fallow.
There are, at least, five decent novel contenders – I think. Although Darkness and the Light is very minor Olaf Stapledon… and a little of the Bloomsbury Group goes a long way, with me, so I can’t work up any overwhelming fits of enthusiasm over Vita Sackville-West’s Grand Canyon (anyone saying “I bet Virginia Woolf could though” will be asked to leave unless they can prove they’re Frankie Howerd)… and Marjorie Bowen is always readable, but she put The Spectral Bride out with a variant title and a pen name, so I wonder how much confidence she had in it herself… and Austin Tappan Wright’s Islandia is very big and travelogue-y…. At least there’s “Doc” Smith. Second Stage Lensmen stands out as a peak of space-operatic quality in a frankly pretty iffy year.
With the novella category, at least there’s one I can definitely recommend, namely Robert A. Heinlein’s “The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathon Hoag”, and one that appeals to my own odd tastes, Anthony Boucher’s “The Compleat Werewolf” (I’m a sucker for werewolf stories [and werewolf-adjacent stories], always have been.) The rest of the ballot is bulked out with “Devil’s Planet” (early Manly Wade Wellman, and obviously not what he’s best remembered for), van Vogt’s “Asylum”, and Cleve Cartmill’s terribly topical (at the time) “They Forgot to ‘Remember Pearl Harbor'”. Can’t think of any Cartmill fans these days, but I have a feeling he was a bigger noise in the 1940s (among other things, he is the guy who later got interviewed by the government when his speculation about atomic bombs sounded a bit too much like the real thing.)
Novelette length – I resisted the temptation to pad the whole thing with bits of Foundation trilogy, but Asimov’s “Bridle and Saddle” seems pretty representative of the ideas of the trilogy as a whole, so in it goes. I’m personally more enthused about George O. Smith’s first “Venus Equilateral” story, “QRM – Interplanetary”, a happy tale of gadgeteers triumphant, even though the gadgets involved are practically Neolithic by today’s standards. Other entrants: more van Vogt in the form of “The Second Solution” (because where would we be if our plots had to make sense?), some Leigh Brackett in “The Sorcerer of Rhiannon” and Fredric Brown with “The Star Mouse”.
Brown crops up again at short story length with “Etaoin Shrdlu” (which brought an immediate smile of recognition to my face – that may be a good sign, because normally I have to stop and think for a minute before I can place a name). So does Heinlein with “My Object All Sublime” and Asimov with a minor robot story, “Robot AL-76 Goes Astray”. Asimov’s robots would be much more efficient if they would devote less processing power to finding edge cases in the Three Laws, and more towards doing their ****ing jobs, you know… but I digress. Possibly the strongest contender here might be “The Twonky” by Lewis Padgett (secretly the husband-and-wife partnership of Henry Kuttner and C.L. Moore. Except we all know this by now, so I guess it’s not exactly secret.) I filled out this section with a bit of a wild card, “The Other Side of the Sun”, one of Lord Dunsany’s tales. (I will write “Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett” if I have to, you democrats you.)
Then there’s the contentious “Best Series” slot – well, it has to be “Lensmen”, doesn’t it? Especially as, despite all the bits of “Foundation” floating around, they don’t actually add up to enough wordcount to qualify…. Nicholas Whyte helpfully collected together some scraps of other series that might be viable, and you can actually find four others if you’ve a mind to. My money is on “Lensmen”, though, if the powers that be decide this category is even viable.
My invention started flagging a bit when it came to “Best Related Work”… I looked up Nonfiction and Essays on ISFDB, but very little seemed familiar, and little of what was familiar seemed worth while. I have vague memories of Willy Ley’s science essays from when I was younger and even less sensible; I have no idea, now, where I came across them, but “Saturn – World of Rings” from the “Landscapes of Other Worlds” series seemed to ring (as it were) a bell; I do remember Derleth and Wandrei’s intro to Out of Space and Time (“Clark Ashton Smith: Master of Fantasy”), so in it goes. Then – well, the rules say that a related work, if fictional, must be noteworthy primarily for aspects other than the fictional text… so, Rocket to the Morgue, which is a detective story and not SF, is noteworthy for sending up the SF fandom culture of its day… so I’m putting it in here. And then I stalled. I have nothing else. I suppose I could fill the remaining two slots with more Willy Ley pop-science, but it seems an inelegant solution.
“Best Graphic Story” is another iffy one, though I did manage to fill it. Probably. The comics debut of “Captain Midnight” is, well, possibly a little obscure… as is the Canadian superheroine “Nelvana of the Northern Lights”… and, well, I’m not sure how much the Charles Addams cartoons in Drawn and Quartered actually constitute a continuous narrative, but what the heck, I like Addams and I’ve got a slot to fill. Then there’s the one where I might be rules-lawyering like crazy – the cover date on “All-Star Comics #8” is December 1941/January 1942, and that might be enough to make it eligible, even though it actually hit the news stands a couple of months earlier. It contains a story called “Introducing Wonder Woman”, as if you didn’t know. At least there is Flash Gordon to fall back on – the “Jungles of Mongo” sequence all actually appeared in 1942, and is top-quality stuff, no rubbish, as you’d expect from Alex Raymond.
I just gave up on Dramatic Presentation, both Long and Short. Seriously. There don’t seem to have been any eligible films for Long Form (the longest one I could find was 88 minutes, just two minutes too short), and in any case the genre films appear mostly to have been horror B-movies whose only merits were that they paid Bela Lugosi’s rent. There don’t seem to have been any good serials, even. There will be stuff in the radio archives, I know – “The Shadow” was still knowing in 1942, I’m well aware of that – but since radio shows excited absolutely no interest among the current crop of voters last time, I’m not going to trawl through them again this year. Lax of me? Possibly.
Long Form Editor is another one where I have nothing to go on… Short Form, of course, is just a matter of identifying who was in charge of various magazines: John W. Campbell is still in it, of course, and Raymond Palmer over at Amazing… Dorothy McIlwraith was still womanfully wrestling with the declining “Weird Tales”… I filled out the remaining slots with editors of mags where some of my short story and novelette choices had appeared: Oscar Friend and Malcolm Reiss, if you’re remotely interested.
Professional Artist? That Addams collection makes Charles Addams a viable candidate… otherwise, it was just a matter of looking at magazine covers and deciding which ones were most striking. Hannes Bok and Margaret Brundage seemed like obvious choices; Robert Fuqua and G.M. Rae, perhaps, less obvious. We’ll see where, if anywhere, this category goes.
Best Semiprozine? I have no idea. As far as I know, all the main skiffy mags were offshoots of professional outfits and hence not eligible. So I left this one blank. Best Fancast went the same way, for reasons which must be fairly obvious.
The fan stuff… well, what do I know about the relics of fandom from a generation before I was even born? Doesn’t stop me having opinions, mind…. For Fan Writer, I have put in Morojo (Myrtle Douglas, who I think got neglected in the last Retros), Donald Wollheim, Damon Knight, Russ Chauvenet, and Ted Carnell, who was keeping the British end up in Futurian War Digest. FWD naturally also features in my Best Fanzine ballot, as do Wollheim’s Phantagraph, Bob Tucker’s Le Zombie, Harry Warner’s Spaceways and Art Widner’s Fanfare. (You can actually find these things online, you know. The scanned-in pages are even legible. Even if Wollheim’s passionate denunciation of Fascism did make his typing go all wonky.) Fan Artist? Mostly a case of picking cover illos off those fanzines, making due allowances for the failures of reproduction (ancient duplicated sheets converted into PDFs….) One rather striking cover, from Voice of the Imagi-Nation 25, turned out to be by Ray Harryhausen, best known for other things entirely. (The others? Arthur Williams for an FWD cover, Harry Jenkins Jr and Roy Hunt for Spaceways 24 and Fanfare 9 respectively; Bernard Webber did a cover and some interior cartoons in Space Tales 4 which made me crack a smile, at least. It must be admitted that the art – and the reproduction methods – are pretty basic, by modern standards. Heck, by modern standards, very little of this would get a look in.)
So those are my thoughts on the 1943 Retro Hugos, and very inadequate and muddled thoughts they are too. Never mind. We shall see what the administrators make of it all. I don’t envy them.