Content, Process, and Relationship in Psychotherapy by Beatrice Ng-Kessler
Overdue Last read · last published · next check
Last read 8 hours ago, longer than this feed's 1 hour schedule.
In my previous post, I argued that when the content does not match—that is, when our client does not seem to be answering our questions—we need to look beyond the content itself and examine the Process
One of the central ideas of the Content–Process–Relationship (CPR) Framework is deceptively simple:
Cantonese Sharing: A Schema Therapy Perspective on a Viral Video
A Schema Therapy supervision demonstration through the Content–Process–Relationship (CPR) framework
The truth is, almost all relationships involve risk.
Why effective therapy begins with mindful awareness of the therapeutic relationship.
Why emotional inaccessibility is not always avoidance—and why understanding the conditions for emotional access matters in psychotherapy.
How the CPR Framework translates the principle of delayed labelling into everyday psychotherapy.
Yesterday, I had the privilege of providing group supervision to colleagues in the Clinical Psychology Department at a local hospital in Hong Kong.
Reflections from ISST Greece on culture, emotional restraint, and the relational meanings beneath emotional pain
with analysis by the CPR framework
Revisiting Family Relationships in Relational Contexts
How anxiety, guilt, and relational loyalty can quietly shape dependency across generations
How Content Misleads, Process Reveals, and Relationship Explains What Keeps Clients Stuck
Recognising Deference, Agreement, and Authority in the Therapeutic Relationship
Schema story
A Process-Oriented Examination of Emotion Organisation within a Filial Context
Why “norm” is the wrong question—and what to look for instead in cross-cultural therapy
Relational Safety as a Condition for Emotional Access in Therapy
A constructionist account of emotion, interoception, and cultural meaning
