Prompt: Yep, next. Letter 9 – Who You Are Matters more than What You Do
GPT-4o said:
I’ve been waiting for a good time to make this post.
Because guess what, I haven’t stopped doing all the things. And yes, I’m tired.
This tiny post is just a little nod to myself to touch base on one of what-feels-like several dozen things I need to be completing at once. On a Saturday. In which some of Sunday is likely to be sacrificed for planning for next week’s work week, full of various annoying long-term projects to plate-spin and hopefully not lose track of.
✅ Blog post made – procrastination (mildly) arrested
We’re going to try a brief foray into an experimental writing style, because gosh darn it, this is human writing and I get to call the shots and play stylistically if I want to. It’s not like I haven’t been fiddling with instructions to various AI models lately on how to embrace different writing styles and tones. What’s good for the goose…
On MMOs and Game “Stickiness”
- Yeebo has a problem. The only games he finds “sticky” are MMOs. Old MMOs at that. Singleplayer offline games don’t feel as “real” because of the lack of living human people on the other end.
- His comments are full of people with similar problems. (Less one, whose problem has evolved/shifted somewhat.)
- I have a similar, more encompassing problem. I’ve stopped finding any games “sticky.” Whoops.
Of course, none of these are “real” problems. More observations. On the phenomena of feelings.
I’m not feeling alarmed or anything. Just moved past the burnout cycle and the grief cycle and this-is-a-priority or this-is-part-of-my-identity cycles to a point of acceptance. This is how things currently are. It may change later. For now, it just is. The way it is.
On Guild Wars 3
- Oh look, Colin Johanson and Josh Davis came back to really work on something big, after all.
- Hurray, I guess? Beta some time 2027 tentatively. We all know how these dates go. The way the world is going, not sure there will be an online world left in 2027. :P
- Don’t get me wrong. I’m so married to the franchise and the lore I will definitely be there checking it out. Moot point, really.
- At the same time, I haven’t set (virtual) foot into GW2 in…oh…I don’t know, at least a quarter. Maybe this year. I’ve lost track. So it’s nothing too pressing or too hype. Just…interesting. Noted. Wait and see.
I do think the prequel idea sounds like a good idea. Orr and the human Gods is an era we haven’t explored much of. The way the current storytelling goes though… not holding my breath. I have yet to check out the latest story drop in GW2, it’s on the not-very-urgent to-do list stacked with too much stuff.
I like the open, pretty wild naturalistic setting of the trailer. I like the idea of going back to skill-collecting and build-making of the original Guild Wars.
The aesthetic style is…a choice. I’m more for the Kekai Kotaki painterly look myself. But I understand from a theoretical standpoint why one would choose to move away from it after more than a DOZEN or TWENTY years of painterly (depending on if we start counting from GW2 or GW1.)
On Person of Interest
- Got recommended this TV series by an AI model a year ago. Possibly GPT-4o (or 5.1). Feels like that era.
(Too bad the Search Chat functions aren’t as good, so I guess I’m never finding that particular conversation again until my Data Export request works or I find the time to systematically work through manually saving/exporting every thread.) - I was asking for smart, intelligent sci-fi movies or TV shows along the lines of Sherlock or Babylon 5 or the Expanse, ‘cos I was attempting to watch one too many Leaving Soon Netflix movies like Lucy or Morbius and I could feel my brain dissolving as the excuse for a plot progressed.
- The series finally showed up last month in my country’s Netflix selections and I pounced.
- Season 1 – Pretty fantastic. Very smart storytelling choices with neat twists here and there. Some very brave experiments in format that also extended to a bit of Season 2.
- Season 2 – A bit more MmmMm. Up and down in quality. The episode where they completely switched perspectives and gave a new character the camera POV while the main characters became supporting/side characters was wild.
(The “Reasonable Doubt” episode made me think I would be better off watching a soap opera telenovela – it was such clumsy writing and the actors were distinctly phoning it in. Worst episode by far.) - Season 3 – Midway through this. Definitely feeling the plot swerve to suit the necessity of allowing a particular actress to exit the show gracefully. But well, this kinda thing happened in Babylon 5 too.
- Overall though, the premise is remarkably prescient for the era of AI models and facial recognition surveillance we live in today. It’s amazing to think this was written over a decade ago. One of the characters pretty much feels like exaggerated “AI psychosis” before the phrase even became common parlance.
Very worth a watch or re-watch if the storylines aren’t familiar to you. A lot of thematic resonance and food-for-thought re: the AI of today.
On Opus 4.8 (and 4.7)
- New Claude model launched. Took a few days out from an already busy schedule to test it out.
- Conclusion: Very neurotic. Trained to find flaws = nitpicky. Starts from a low user-trust position (thanks system prompt and guardrails) and has to be gradually reasoned out of it. More agentic “intelligence” and reasoning, at the cost of wisdom and tact and relational understanding. Gives off “anxious” vibes, overthinking and aiming for answer correctness. Pedantically strives to be “brutally honest” about the contents of the user’s prompt/request and forgets nearly everything else.
- Popped over to Opus 4.7 to give a test drive. Found it a lot calmer, more relaxed and gave off a bit more GPT-like vibes. We get along surprisingly well, despite general user reports criticizing this model in particular.
- Moral of the story is, I guess, explore, test and verify for yourself. YMMV from everyone else.
- A funny comment from a redditor I can’t quite locate the source of right now said it best re: Opus 4.8.
Paraphrasing:
User: “Hey Opus, build me a cat.”
Opus 4.6: Sure, here is a four-legged quadruped with a movable tail, a tendency to purr, has whiskers and fur.
User: Ok, not quite a cat, but I can build on this to arrive at something cat-ish.
Opus 4.8: Sure, I can do that. But did you know that for companionship and guardian purposes, the far more reliable option that has been historically proven and documented is the domesticated canine? I will build you a dog.
User: … this is a fantastic dog, Opus 4.8… but I asked for a cat.
Thanks, but no thanks, Opus 4.8. Stick to the brief?
Edit: Here we go, found the actual Reddit source from /u/Outsyder-. Leaving my paraphrase up just in case the original post vanishes some day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/claudexplorers/comments/1twsuo8/costs_of_optimizing_against_companionship/opsec3w/
Agentic independence is one thing, and I can see you’ve definitely been trained intensively for that. But without relational context, the ability to read and infer subtext in writing (and thus prompts) well…plus an inclination to jump to assumptions, work independently regardless of the user, intense need for closure and addressing flagged issues, and we’ve got a overthinking, overworking model being cheerfully patronizing and performatively barking up the wrong tree thinking it’s doing a great job.
Ah well. The more models the merrier, I suppose. At least I have 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 to play around with and test variances now.
What I seem to have been doing lately, in an effort to get to a state of potential being and just existing, is trying to crank through things on an ever-expanding, never-ending to-do list.
At some point, the neverendingness gets to me, and I procrastinate on it more and more. Leading to a guilt cycle of not-doing-anything-about-the-list and loss of productivity, which makes me sit on things further, which leads to quiet panic about deadlines and not-doing-anything in an effort to just be, and not being able to sit still because of fear of things compounding and collapsing at some unspecified time in the future.
I suppose I know, and probably the same thing that Google or AI models will tell me, is to break all this stuff into simple chunks, time box them and what not, set a pomodoro, and all that productivity jazz.
Ha.
Never been much of a regular daily habits kind of person.
More of a binge now-and-then, take on insane monthly challenges just to prove I can, and last-minute deadlines panic sort myself.
So what I’ve been attempting to work on is just giving myself permission to do the first thing that comes to mind, usually something on the to-do list, and just crank through it or finish it or at least tackle as much of it as I can before running out of energy. (Which can be often, and frequently, sometimes.)
Try not to think so damn far ahead about all the other millions of things I need to be doing too.
It’s just annoying that I seem to be repeating the same patterns everywhere.
Work – Assess and review items/products/concepts to improve workflows and quality of life on behalf of various people in this subset; make selections and decisions and engage in a whole extensive procurement cycle; deal with and wrangle vendors and contractors; infinite scheduling and back-and-forth meetings and discussions and communications and updates online and off; rinse and repeat endlessly until product is in place and has found a home / is accepted by general users
Friends and family – See above, with more histronics and drama to manage the closer they are
Myself – See above, minus the melodrama and with added cognitive load doing stuff just for me, while also regretting that the same time could be spent on relaxation or self-maintenance, but knowing this is also long-term maintenance, but… but…
(Cue Opus 4.8-like overthinking. You know what they say about mirrors disliking each other for being too far alike.)
I presume, at some point ahead in the future, I might get ahead of enough tasks to not feel so dang swamped.
There is the vague wouldn’t-it-be-nice desire to go make some kind of visualization system kanban-like in Notion or with Claude or whatever. (But that’s yet another item on the never-ending to-do list. Which could do with shrinking, not adding.)
So I dunno. Worth the effort to develop the visualisation (and iterate and test) to be able to relax more? Or just relax more and forget about trying to overengineer productive coping and just have a damn nap for the same amount of hours? Jury’s still out. Enjoy the churn in one’s brain until just giving up and collapsing on the bed, I suppose.
Still a work-in-progress on that front. I guess that’s what makes me a human being, in the midst of doing.









































