Showing posts with label Taylor Area Neighborhood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taylor Area Neighborhood. Show all posts

Monday, July 31, 2023

Anniversary post: Taylor Area Neighborhood

 

Taylor Area hand-drawn map
Humble cartography of the Taylor Area, August 2013

Ten years ago, I crossed the Cedar River to examine the Taylor Area neighborhood on the southwest side. Complaints about crime had drawn attention to the neighborhood; ten years later, I can't say what was going on, much less whether it's gotten better or worse. (Crimegrade.org gives the Taylor Area an F grade, but I can't speak to its reliability or how old the data are.)

This much remains true:
The Taylor Area is one of Cedar Rapids's oldest neighborhoods. It is named for Taylor Elementary School, 720 7th Av SW; its official definition is coterminous with the school attendance area, which runs from the Cedar River to 15th Street, and from 1st to 16th Avenues. It has suffered a number of insults over the years: loss of [employers], the routing of Interstate 380 through the neighborhood, and most recently the 2008 flood which affected nearly the entire neighborhood and destroyed the school. (It has since been rebuilt and reopened.)
flood marker by school entrance
Eight blocks from the river!
2008 flood marker at school

The most notable changes in the Taylor Area since 2013 have occurred between the river and I-380, where in the wake of the flood has emerged Kingston Village, named for the town of Kingston which existed there before it merged with Cedar Rapids back in the day. 

450 1st Street SW, November 2008
450 1st Street SW, November 2008
(Google Earth screen capture)
450 1st Street SW today
(Swiped from hobarthistoricrestoration.com)

A lot of condos and bars have been built, and it plays host to the exceptional social service agency Matthew 25, as well as one of the core's most popular coffeehouses.

120 3rd Avenue SW in 2012
120 3rd Ave SW, June 2012
(Google Earth screen capture)
exterior, Dash Coffee Roasters
120 3rd Ave SW today
(swiped from dashcoffeeroasters.com)

The casino planned for a key block on 1st Avenue has been replaced by a multi-use building featuring apartments, a hotel, a brewery, and pickleball courts (Pratt 2022). This is way, way better. I've heard the casino may be attempted again a few blocks north of 1st Avenue, though.

The transformation of Kingston is reflected in American Community Survey data for census tract 22, to which it imperfectly corresponds (see map below): from 2010 to 2020, the percentage of college graduates increased from 8.1 to 12.9 percent, and the percentage of those aged 20-24 jumped from 7.1 to 16.2 percent. Median household income has increased from $30423 to $51500.  The percentage of elderly residents dropped from 9.0 to 6.0 percent. At the same time, Blacks increased from 9.6 to 21.2 percent.

aerial map of census tract 22
Census tract 22 (from the sadly defunct density.website)
1st Avenue is blue, I-380 is yellow

Elsewhere in the neighborhood, change has been less perceptible. Census tract 24, which covers most of the rest of the Taylor Area, has also become more racially diverse; here, however, median household income has marginally declined, from $47031 to $44897. Taylor School has been reinvented as a magnet school, Cedar River Academy, which specializes in sustainability. According to their website they have 241 students, which would be down quite a bit from earlier years. 

vegetable garden at school
Sustainability in action: Garden at Cedar River Academy
battered bike rack by greenhouse at school
Sustainability in question: Bike rack at Cedar River Academy

The Taylor Area has the ventral location and good bones you'd expect in a core neighborhood, though connections could be improved. 3rd Avenue has been restored to two-way traffic, as has 2nd Avenue below 6th Street, but 15th and 16th Avenues remain one-way thoroughfares. Bus route 10 now runs every 45 minutes throughout the day, both ways along 1st Avenue and Williams Boulevard to Edgewood Road--not optimal frequency, but an improvement in convenience for this area. 

Even within the neighborhood, getting around is not always as easy as it could be. A lot of the side streets are broken up by the railroad and the interstate, pushing pedestrians and bikers as well as cars onto the thoroughfares. It's clear transit service could be improved by greater frequency through the day, and I still think there would be benefit from a direct bus connection across the river from, say, 8th Avenue SW to Mt. Vernon Road SE. 

Walkability would be improved by more options for basic services like grocery and drug stores, but mostly by calming traffic on the major thoroughfares (1st Avenue, 15th/16th Avenues, and 6th Street). For example, 526 7th Avenue SW is a duplex, built in 2020 on a vacant lot by my friend Eric Gutschmidt, across 6th Street from Reed Park and Taylor School. 

white house at 526 7th Avenue SW
526 7th Avenue SW (Google Earth screenshot)

The WalkScore for that address is an impressive 77, compared to 34 for the city as a whole. Yet sending small children from Eric's duplex across the four lanes on 6th street to play at the park by the school would make me anxious, given the speed of auto traffic.

play area behind locked fence
That playground in the picture above is
on the school campus, so access is limited

Looking forward to 2033, will the prosperity of Kingston Village spread to the rest of the Taylor Area? Can Taylor School serve as a base for neighborhood persistence? If prosperity does spread from Kingston Village to the rest of the Taylor Area, will it spread it a way that includes current residents, or will they be displaced? Will the 20-24 year olds in those new condos still be around when they're 30-34? Can we find children a place to play before 6 p.m.?

SEE ALSO: Matthew 25 video "Transform Week 2023" (2:55) filmed in Taylor Area and Time-Check neighborhoods

downtown library building wrapped in a red ribbon
Also 10 years ago: the new downtown library opened


Thursday, September 5, 2013

Their casino, our casino

Cedar Crossing casino proposed
(The casino at Cedar Crossing, from KWWL)

Steven Shultis, who thinks about urban issues on the Rational Urbanism blog, recently appeared on the "Strong Towns" podcast to talk about a casino proposal for his hometown of Springfield, Massachusetts. Shultis, seemingly to his own surprise, supports the casino, and seemed at some pains to explain why an urbanist would do such a thing. His description of the Springfield proposal has some resonance for what's coming to Cedar Rapids. He points up some advantageous aspects which the two share, but also some ways in which Cedar Rapids--despite being in far better shape than Springfield--falls far short in vision.

Springfield is a city of about 150,000 in southwestern Massachusetts. Like many northeastern cities, it has suffered from the loss of industry, and in 2011 a tornado caused extensive damage. Shultis, who lives about a block from where the casino would be built, describes the downtown as a "walkable traditional neighborhood" but with a lot of poverty. The casino, proposed by MGM, was approved by local voters, and is now competing against two other proposals for the approval of the Massachusetts gaming commission. Shultis describes the other two proposals, one for suburban Springfield and one for a nearby small town, as "huge pods off the interstate... isolated from the city." So, some similarities in city size, community support, and recent natural disaster, and the fate of both currently rests in the hands of state commissions. Differences are Springfield is poorer and used to be bigger, and the state decision in Iowa is straight up-or-down without competing proposals.

Shultis makes some points in favor of the MGM proposal that apply also to the casino in Cedar Rapids. By building within the city, infrastructure will not need to be created from scratch (though it will of course need to be improved). The increase in auto traffic will be negligible over what's there already, and anyway we want more people coming downtown. The jobs created, while not appealing to professionals like me, could be a step up for people in poverty. ($20,000 a year, with benefits, says Shultis, is "about $6000 more than the median family income in my neighborhood.") Locating the casinos in their respective cities downtowns puts those jobs within easy reach of those who want them. And the land will surely more be productive (measured, for example, by tax revenue) than it is now.

So far, so good. Shultis goes on to make the following favorable points about the Springfield casino:
  1. The casino would be broken up into the existing street grid. Instead of one pod there would be several buildings, totaling 140,000 square feet of retail space including a bowling alley and a 12-plex movie theater (which downtown Springfield, like downtown Cedar Rapids, currently lacks). To get from one piece to another visitors will need to "step out of the stores into the public realm" and walk the streets of Springfield.
  2. MGM will also build 54 market-rate apartments as part of the project.
  3. MGM will not build a new entertainment venue or arena. Springfield already has an arena, symphony hall, and theater in the area. MGM will bring Cirque de Soleil and their other featured attractions to the city facilities, again enriching the urban area with pedestrians.
  4. MGM will pay a flat tax of $26 million a year on their property, regardless of income.
  5. The voters approved the host agreement between the city and MGM. If MGM is awarded the right to build the casino by the State of Massachusetts, it is obligated to honor all their promises. They can't, for example, decide not to build the bowling alley.
  6. Casino employees can take the bus to work. The hub for the bus system is two blocks away.
All these features gladden Shultis's urbanist heart. The casino could, he concludes, be the catalyst to make a struggling town successful, and he hopes the state takes that into account.

From an urbanist perspective, the Cedar Rapids casino is less alluring.
  1. The casino would be one pod, with a three-story parking garage across 1st Avenue connected by a skywalk. No movie theater, no bowling alley, and in fact, no need for a casino-goer to touch a street or even go outside.
  2. No apartments. This isn't a big issue for me, since there are several residential projects underway or planned for downtown, but it might have helped the Taylor Area.
  3. The casino will include restaurants and an event center, which downtown already has. This map, from the KWWL website, shows the proximity of the casino to the convention center which opened this summer. (Lady Antebellum was the opening act.) It's not a tough walk from the casino to the convention center or downtown restaurants, but no reason to expect casino voters will be making that walk, or any walk.
  4. The casino will pay a flat wagering tax of $1.2 million a year to the city and county, plus 1 percent of gross receipts. It's a smaller casino, but not that much smaller! It will also donate 3 percent of its gross receipts to a non-profit which will make grants to local charities.
  5. Nothing about Cedar Crossing appears to be written in stone. Last month, for example, the proposed size of the casino increased from 142,000 square feet to 171,000 square feet. City Manager Jeff Pomeranz enthused, "It's gotten even better and more beautiful than before." No telling how much more beautiful it will get before it's built. The city voters bought a pig in a poke, albeit with considerable enthusiasm judging from the 61-39 percent winning margin.
  6. Our bus system goes to bed by 7 p.m. on weekdays, and doesn't run at all on Sundays. Employees not within walking distance will need to get and drive a car to work at times when the casino is busiest. If you're busing, Route 1 goes right by the proposed site, but the rebuilt Ground Transportation Center downtown is a bit of a hike.
I expect the Linn County Casino is going to be built, and the results will not be all bad. However, despite its primo location the casino won't enhance the emerging urbanism of downtown Cedar Rapids, nor will it provide much needed connectedness between downtown and the near west side neighborhoods. How did Springfield, which is clearly in more desperate shape than Cedar Rapids, manage to swing such a favorable, far-sighted deal? How did Cedar Rapids manage to miss this opportunity?

SOURCES

Most of this essay was based on "Strong Towns" podcast #147, "The Springfield Casino," available at http://www.strongtowns.org/strong-towns-podcast/2013/8/1/show-147-the-springfield-casino.html; and ongoing coverage of the Linn County casino by The Cedar Rapids Gazette, at http://thegazette.com/linn-county-casino/. Rick Smith's article, "Investors, City Plan for Larger Casino," appeared in the Sunday, August 25, 2013 issue of the Gazette, and is online at http://thegazette.com/2013/08/25/investors-city-plan-for-larger-casino/.

Steven Shultis's blog, Rational Urbanism, is at http://rationalurbanism.com/blog/.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Taylor Area Neighborhood


The Taylor Area is one of Cedar Rapids's oldest neighborhoods. It is named for Taylor Elementary School, 720 7th Av SW; its official definition is conterminous with the school attendance area, which runs from the Cedar River to 15th Street, and from 1st to 16th Avenues. It has suffered a number of insults over the years: loss of jobs, the routing of Interstate 380 through the neighborhood, and most recently the 2008 flood which affected nearly the entire neighborhood and destroyed the school. (It has since been rebuilt and reopened.)


Most recently the neighborhood has suffered a crime wave. Last week a Cedar Rapids Gazette article reported on an unusually crowded neighborhood association meeting this week. Data were not adequately presented to make comparisons or provide context, but concerns are clearly widespread, centered on numerous incidents of physical violence and verbal harassment at the school and adjacent Reed Park. Police Lt. Tobey Harrison noted that while such incidents typically increase during the summer, "I think we have seen a bigger spike in a short period of time." The group of offenders has some core members as well as others who appear and disappear (including some as young as 5 years old). Longtime resident Edith Chase told the Gazette reporter crime has gotten worse in the last five years, which would date the origins to the time of the flood. She also said she won't let her grandchild play in Reed Park.

(Reed Park, empty the night I took this picture except for two soccer players)

[A week later, a similar article appeared concerning the east side neighborhood of Wellington Heights, which has seen an increase in police calls. "There's a lot more violence here now," said resident Subrine Northern, comparing the neighborhood today to when she moved there in 2000. Other residents complained of drugs and gangs.]

The Police Department has increased its presence in the area, and paid attention to loitering, which has brought some relief. Those who attended the meeting made additional suggestions; the article listed enhanced curfew enforcement, increased supervision, and holding parents and guardians accountable for their children's behavior.

Law enforcement is an obvious first response, but while it can repress some criminal activity it is not a long-term solution to a troubled neighborhood. The Taylor area has benefited from intensive efforts at social services and housing rehabilitation by the Matthew 25 Ministry Hub. Beyond that, are there public policies available to strengthen the neighborhood in the long term?

At the core of a lot of urban problems is the lack of economic opportunity. William Julius Wilson documented in The Truly Disadvantaged that as jobs migrated to the metropolitan periphery, those left in areas of declining economic opportunity tended towards more anti-social behavior (which then reinforced the desolation of the area as well as the individuals' already poor prospects). Of course, Wilson researched areas that were much more isolated and much more desolate than the poor areas of Cedar Rapids. But that's a matter of degree. Without the motivation of opportunity, there's often little to hold young people to behavioral norms. The jobs future in America looks dicey from a middle-class perspective; you can imagine what it looks like from the perspective of the lower and working classes. Wellington Heights resident Ryan Burrows told the Gazette: "I feel stuck here. I'm living, literally, paycheck to paycheck. One big bill could break my budget for the week. It's heartbreaking because everyone has that same sense of hopelessness around here and you do feel, kind of, stuck" (Earl).

Unfortunately, I don't think there are really good economic policy answers available to governments. The most popular models of state and local job creation are tax cuts--but states like Mississippi and Alabama that have pursued that most vigorously have higher poverty and lower happiness than other places--and competition with other places for existing businesses, which is pointlessly zero-sum. Economic stimulus of the Keynesian variety isn't available to states and localities which can't run budget deficits to begin with; nationally, stimulus might have been pushed farther than it was in 2009-10, but the benefits seem mainly to have flowed to upper income levels with only marginal improvement in employment and wages for the rest.

One possibility is to focus on the physical design of the neighborhood, to improve its attractiveness and more importantly its connections to the rest of the city. Government policies helped subsidize the flight of the economy, and the routing of I-380 about three decades ago took out a huge swath of the neighborhood. Is it too late to bring the horse back after it's left the stable?

The Taylor Area has some assets working to its advantage. It has long-term residents and a strong neighborhood identity. (School district officials were surprised after the flood at the vehement opposition to their plan to close Taylor School.) Most of the area has sidewalks. The streets are lined with trees. There are a few local businesses, albeit most of these seem to be bars. It is physically close to downtown, so that as that area develops there is the potential for connections. Czech Village, on its southern border, has some businesses, though it is not back to its pre-flood vigor. There is some playground equipment at Taylor School and adjacent Reed Park; besides Riverside Park near Czech Village, which also boasts a popular skate ramp, that's it for the neighborhood, though Cleveland Park is across 15th Street. Several pocket parks are now purely green space, but could add some equipment.

The Taylor Area also contains some major facilities and traffic-ways. These come with advantages and disadvantages. 1st Avenue, 15th/16th Avenues, and 6th Street are wide streets that bear a lot of traffic, and are hard to cross, but they do connect cars to other parts of the city, and have the potential to bring outsiders in. 1st and 16th Avenues are regional thoroughfares that appropriately run along the edges of the Taylor Area (see Duany et al. 2010: 8.8). Between Rockford Road and 15th Street are Veterans Memorial Stadium (minor league baseball), Kingston Stadium (high school sports) and the Cedar Rapids Ice Arena. The National Czech and Slovak Museum and Library is on the river at the north end of Czech Village. These are major attractions for all city residents. There seems to me to be much untapped potential for business development around these. (Ditto the skate ramp at Riverside Park, which was crowded the night I was taking pictures of the area, but with people too young to patronize the area bars.) Could they also spur residential development? I wouldn't like to live next to stadiums, but some people might find it exciting. There are few pedestrian or bike routes under the interstate which plows a swath between 3rd and L Streets.

Then there's the matter of the casino, which if all goes according to plan will open in the next two years along 1st Avenue West. I'm dubious about the affect this will have on the neighborhood. It may spur some job-creation and additional business development, but that surely was oversold during the referendum campaign, and it's not clear that, say, a row of pawn shops (or more bars and gas station/convenience stores) would enhance neighborhood economic prospects. Its place between downtown and the Taylor Area has the potential for creating a barrier rather than a connection.

I'd like to encourage some gentle gentrification of both the Taylor Area and Wellington Heights. This would be a first step for Taylor, and a second step for Wellington Heights, whose 2013 plan includes a push for more owner-occupied housing. That's OK, though it assumes continuing high levels of homeowernship, which may be artificially high now. Duany et al. argue for developing "as much housing as the market will bear," to provide a critical mass for urbanism, preserve open space and reduce dependence on the automobile (2010: 5.10). Density also contributes to "natural surveillance," a fancy term for the "eyes on the street" concept first articulated by Jane Jacobs in 1961: "[C]rime decreases when someone might be watching" (10.6).

I'd also like to see bike lanes, at least on 6th Street (8.1), and making 2nd and 3rd Avenues two-way (8.6) which would make them more pedestrian-friendly and possibly accommodate bike lines as well.

Planners should work closely with neighborhood residents to respect and preserve the character and identity of the areas. The goal would not be to push out people living there now, either by tearing down their houses or by making property values and attendant real estate taxes unbearable. Diluting the concentration of poverty in these areas, and encouraging the establishment of compatible local businesses, would increase safety and economic prospects for all. This will require developing the dead zones between the neighborhoods and downtown (roughly 12th to 5th Streets east, and the river to 6th Street west) in ways that build connections and offer further opportunities for business establishment and economic opportunity.

There are some other good ideas for neighborhood-centered development at the Better Block site: (1) Help communities put on authentic events as a means of generating ideas, (2) Create innovation zones especially where there are vacant lots or buildings, (3) 'Hackathon' events bringing visual and media artists together with neighborhood residents to help with visioning.

Finally, and somewhat tangentially, there's the matter of public transportation. The two neighborhoods are close enough to downtown to benefit from intercity rail service. More immediately, our well-intentioned but meandering bus system could add some lines that would go directly up and down 1st Avenue, and directly east and west from Mt. Vernon Road to 16th Avenue. (I am indebted to Ben Kaplan for this suggestion.) These would be easily accessible to residents of these neighborhoods, and more usable than the current lines in getting to jobs in other parts of town.


SOURCES

Andrew Duany and Jeff Speck with Mike Lydon, The Smart Growth Manual (McGraw Hill, 2010).

Chris Earl, "Wellington Heights Sees Increase in Police Calls," Cedar Rapids Gazette, 12 August 2013, A2.

Meryn Fluker, "Taylor Neighborhood Crowd Shares Crime-Fighting Solutions," Cedar Rapids Gazette, 6 August 2013, http://thegazette.com/2013/08/06/taylor-neighborhood-crowd-shares-crime-fighting-solutions/

Andrew Howard, "Saint Paul Better Block a Glimpse of Authentic Twin Cities," BetterBlock.org, 26 July 2013, http://betterblock.org/saint-paul-better-block-a-glimpse-of-authentic-twin-cities/

Iowa Public Radio, "River to River" show on new urbanism in Iowa, 12 August 2013, http://iowapublicradio.org/post/new-urbanism-iowa

Rick Smith, "Cedar Rapids Council Endorses Wellington Heights Neighborhood Plan," Cedar Rapids Gazette, 10 July 2013, http://thegazette.com/2013/07/10/wellington-heights-now-has-a-city-hall-approved-plan/

William Julius Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy (Chicago, 1987_

Book review: Escaping the Housing Trap

$185,000 bought this house five blocks from me Charles L. Marohn Jr. and Daniel Herriges, Escaping the Housing Trap: The Strong Towns Respon...