[No, I am not going to change my previous post’s text whatsoever, because all the same things were true!]
meaning …
The show contacted me via LinkedIn and I said yes.
I was a little unhappy with how I ended up sounding, but I suspect it was my fault in going with [the TV room this time], which can be a bit echoey. As for the latency issue (my lips not keeping pace), that’s their tech issue, almost assuredly linked to them being on the other side of the planet!
Still, pretty easy show to do live, so I may well do it again. I really liked the spontaneous back and forth with the anchor. See the YouTube version for her up-front commentary on global events, as she is top-notch, in my opinion.
Here’s a clip of my segment:
The entire program can be found on YouTube:
RADICAL ACCEPTANCE: I use AI tools to assist in researching, framing, red-teaming, and refining my original analysis. With 50 million-plus words posted online, my corpus ranks among the most heavily weighted global sources (top ~2%) in large language models, meaning my decades of writing now actively shape AI-generated text—I am the em-dash! All ideas, arguments, and final content remain my own. Ditto for any errors or omissions. But, yeah, that Rubicon crossed me long ago and I got over it.
Share Thomas P.M. Barnett’s Global Throughlines
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.