You don’t have time for three hours of doomscrolling, twenty half-baked takes, and some guy online screaming READ THE THREAD. We are Front Page Detectives, this is your morning Drive-By, and here is what is real.
A 2008 police tape just dropped one of the strangest details yet into the Tupac murder trial.
Jurors in Duane “Keffe D” Davis’ murder trial heard recorded interviews in which the admitted South Side Compton Crips figure described the night Tupac Shakur was shot and claimed Sean “Puff Daddy” Combs had previously offered $1 million to kill Shakur and Suge Knight. Combs has denied involvement in the killing.
Davis told investigators he obtained a gun that night from Harlem gangster and music-industry associate Eric “Von Zip” Martin after the Mike Tyson fight at the MGM Grand. According to Davis, Martin had been sitting in a Mercedes with rapper Foxy Brown before asking her to step out so the men could “talk business.” Davis claimed Martin then produced a .40-caliber Glock from a hidden compartment.
Davis said he later rode in the white Cadillac that pulled alongside Knight’s BMW and that his nephew Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson opened fire after Shakur was spotted hanging from the passenger window. Tupac was mortally wounded and died six days later. Knight survived.
Then came the detail likely to stick with jurors. Davis claimed Combs called him the following day and that Faith Evans, the widow-to-be of Christopher “Biggie Smalls” Wallace, was there when the question was asked: “Was that us?” It does not prove Evans knew anything about the shooting, but nearly 30 years later, those four words have become another ghost wandering through one of hip-hop’s darkest nights.
Hot Take
Murder cases collect echoes. A gun disappears, witnesses die, memories rot. Then a tape starts playing and four little words walk back into the room wearing blood on their shoes.
Read more
The government said some records were duplicative. Then supposedly withheld notes showed up online.
Representative Ted Lieu has accused Attorney General Todd Blanche of illegally withholding Epstein-related FBI records after a researcher reported that nearly two dozen handwritten interview notes had apparently been sitting online unredacted for months. The notes reportedly stem from FBI interviews with a woman identified as “Jane Doe 4.”
The woman accused Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump of sexually and physically abusing her beginning when she was 13. Trump has denied wrongdoing and faces no criminal charges connected to those allegations. According to reporting cited in the dispute, an unnamed Justice Department source said FBI agents considered the woman credible during four interviews.
The Justice Department has argued that some withheld Epstein material is duplicative of records already released. But attorney Katie Phang, who is suing for additional files, argues these notes contain information that was not previously disclosed. Lieu accused Blanche directly of violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act, while other commentators called the apparent withholding inexplicable.
Hot Take
Washington loves the word “duplicative.” Sounds clean. Bureaucratic. Harmless. Sometimes it just means somebody found a better label for the drawer they hoped nobody would open.
Seven months in, the question is no longer just where Nancy went. It is whether investigators looked everywhere they should have.
Retired FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer is publicly challenging the scope of searches around Nancy Guthrie’s Tucson-area home, arguing authorities should conduct a broader examination of the surrounding Sonoran Desert. Guthrie, 84, vanished from her Catalina Foothills home at the end of January and has not been found.
The criticism intensified after human remains were discovered roughly 15 miles away. Authorities said those remains had apparently been there for an extended period and there was no current indication they were connected to Guthrie. Coffindaffer nevertheless questioned why more volunteer search assistance had not been accepted and why surrounding desert terrain was not being searched more aggressively.
Some of her claims have been challenged. Reporting shows FBI agents and deputies continued desert searches beyond the first days of the investigation, involving hundreds of personnel. Still, with no publicly identified suspect and a reward exceeding $1 million, every unexplored patch of ground now looks like unfinished business.
Hot Take
The desert keeps secrets better than most people. Sun bleaches the evidence, wind moves the dirt, and every day you wait gives the landscape another chance to lie.
Read more
The guilty verdict stands, and the next stop is the appeals court.
A Texas judge has rejected Karmelo Anthony’s bid for a new trial in the stabbing death of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet. Anthony, now 19, was convicted of murder in June and sentenced to 35 years in prison. His attorneys say they will appeal.
The retrial request centered partly on an informal agreement between prosecutors and the defense to keep damaging character evidence about both teenagers away from the jury. Defense lawyers argued fears that prosecutors might abandon that understanding changed their strategy at the last minute and influenced Anthony’s decision not to testify.
Jurors rejected Anthony’s claim of self-defense. Witnesses said the confrontation began after Anthony sat beneath another school team’s tent and was repeatedly told to leave. According to testimony, Metcalf eventually pushed Anthony after an escalating argument, and Anthony pulled a knife and stabbed him in the chest. The judge denied the new-trial motion without extensive explanation.
Hot Take
A verdict closes one door. Appeals lawyers spend years checking the hinges. Sometimes they find a crack. Most times the lock holds.
Three dead children are at the center of a murder trial. Online, some people still found a way to make it about themselves.
Social media videos showing mothers splashing water on young children, laughing, or staging emotional parenting content have drawn outrage as Lindsay Clancy stands trial on charges that she murdered her three children. Clancy has pleaded not guilty to killing Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and eight-month-old Callan.
Other videos have shown women crying while holding babies and pairing the footage with excerpts attributed to Clancy about anxiety, depression, and despair. Critics argue the posts risk turning a filicide case into identification content, reducing three dead children to props in someone else’s performance of motherhood. Whatever Clancy’s defense ultimately argues about criminal responsibility, the children are not metaphors.
If convicted of murder, Clancy faces life without parole. If found not criminally responsible, she could instead be committed to a secure mental health facility. A jury will decide the legal question. TikTok already decided it wanted engagement.
Hot Take
Three children are dead. That ought to be enough gravity to keep the cameras pointed down. But the internet can turn anything into a mirror if you give it five minutes and a ring light.
Read more
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.