Hello and Welcome To My Substack
I recently had a very interesting conversation with Professor Konstantin Korotkov when I interviewed him. Professor Korotkov is a polymath whose wide-ranging work explores the human biofield, consciousness, telepathy, life after death, altered states, structured water, meditation and environmental energy.
Two subjects of particular interest to both of us are water and consciousness, which prompted me to write this Substack.
💧 Why water has properties unlike any other molecule.
🧠 Different ideas about what consciousness might actually be.
📡 Could water behave like a fractal antenna or even a biological “radio”?
🌊 Structured water, coherent domains and the Fourth Phase of Water.
🧊 Veda Austin’s experiments exploring water, intention and consciousness.
🔷 Platonic solids, Golden Ratio geometry and biogeometry.
⚡ Charge collapse, coherence and Dan Winter’s ideas.
☀️ How light, magnetism and water work together inside living organisms.
🤔 Why these ideas could change the way we think about health, biology and consciousness.
For a long time, scientists and thinkers such as Rupert Sheldrake, William Tiller, Dan Winter, Professor Korotkov, Professor Robert Temple and many others have argued that consciousness is not something confined inside our skulls, but exists beyond the physical body.
Some entities, such as plasma entities, do not a conventional biological body made mostly of water, or even a body at all, but can still be considered ‘alive’, conscious and intelligent. When I interviewed Professor Robert Temple for my podcast, we had a two-and-a-half-hour conversation about plasma—and much more.
I uploaded only Part 1 of the podcast because he went off on a , lengthy tangent about life after death and scientists including Andrew Marino, Albert Szent-Györgyi and others and chatted. I have included both Part 1 and Part 2 of the Robert Temple interview at the end of this post and Part 2 is only available here for now.
I am hoping to see Prof Temple in the near future and we may do another interview for public Part 2.
After interviewing Professor Korotkov last week—whose work also includes the study of life after death—I remembered my giant Robert Temple interview and realised how closely these subjects connect.
In addition, many scientists and influencers insist that structured water is woo woo, water being a battery and water having memory is nonsense—and that water has nothing to do with consciousness.
However, based on the research I have done, my personal experiences, and my exploration of the work of Veda Austin, Randy Hatton, Martin Chaplin, Gilbert Ling, Thomas J. Brown, Ken Wheeler and many other great minds, I, like many others, believe there is a clear link between water and consciousness, and water may even be a radio!
Water is FAR more than a solvent or something to wash dishes. It seems to be an active participant in biological organisation and consciousness, with the ability to store and transmit information, respond to its environment and act as a fractal antenna.
Nobody can prove or disprove the Sun or even an atom is conscious or not, and that’s not what this Substack is about.
The level of ‘consciousness’ of a crystal or a rock or a star is up to you to decide for yourself. Some people think it’s stupid to think the Sun is conscious, and others think those people are stupid for thinking the Sun is not conscious.
Everything in nature oscillates.
Such as
heartbeat
breathing
brain waves
atoms
mechanical vibrations
electromagnetic fields
Which suggests that resonance is one mechanism by which consciousness interacts with the physical world.
Bentov says consciousness evolves by becoming increasingly aware of itself.
He views it as an evolution, moving roughly along this progression:
Matter → Life → Nervous systems → Self-awareness → Expanded consciousness → Unity with universal consciousness.
Plasma which can self assemble into structures which can have intelligence, is a subject Professor Robert Temple and poly maths like Paul Harris have talked about and studied for a long time. This subject then opens up discussions on what angels or other beings could be made of, which again is something for you to come to your own conclusions.
You may have a different idea or definition. There are several ‘rights’. As well as ‘we don’t know’.
To start with, if we consider biological organisms that are made mostly of water for the moment.
A simple definition can be
‘Consciousness is the ability to perceive information from the environment, interpret its meaning and adapt behaviour in response’
From this point of view, every living organism possesses consciousness:
humans
animals
plants
microorganisms
every living cell
Inanimate objects do not possess consciousness according to this definition because a pile of earth doesn’t change its behaviour when it gets wet or the sun shines on it.
The next level of consciousness could be is defined as the ability to:
predict future events
remember past events
plan ahead
modify future behaviour using previous experience
This level is present in many higher animals.
dogs
cats
horses
dolphins
monkeys
crows
Rupert Sheldrake’s book Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home as an example of research suggesting some animals can anticipate events based on the owners intent before obvious sensory cues are available. For example, my cat hiding if I think about getting the cat carrier out or dogs who know when the owner is coming home. I am sure the horse whisperers and some of you reading this can describe telepathic events with your animals.
Professor Korotkov has studied telepathy on humans and published his findings. When I met him in Portugal in 2024 at a water conference, this was what happened when we exchanged details
Prof Korotkov he didn’t have a phone.
I asked why.
He laughed and said,
“I just communicate telepathically with those I need to.”
I was interested as many people know about ‘The Telepathy Tapes’ and how autistics communicate. This was a refreshing surprise.
The next level of consciousness could be described as:
The ability to generate new ideas, exchange those ideas with others, transmit them to future generations and manifest them in objective reality. - Konstantin Korotkov
For example:
civilisation
science
engineering
architecture
politics
business
education
art
poetry
This is saying that consciousness is combining knowledge, experience and intuition to create genuinely new solutions, ideas or creations.
How these ‘ideas’ arrive is also an interesting subject. As this is where ‘downloads’ can come in. Meaning your brain didn’t think of the idea internally; it received it.
The information was there already in the ‘field’ or the quantum space or the collective unconscious and you received it by being an antenna not an idea generator.
In fact Mozart said he didn’t think of his compositions; he was ‘given them’ he heard them in his head and wrote them down. Maybe Handel, Wagner and others had the same experience and all the ‘classical music has been downloaded now’, which is why no more compositions that are as good as the classics have been composed for 100s of years.
Who or what puts things like this in the field. Nobody knows.
I really love fantasy, sci-fi and LitRPG books, and I have often found myself wondering, “How on earth did somebody think that up?”
Whether it’s Enid Blyton, Tolkien, Philip K. Dick or H.G. Wells, or more modern authors such as Aleron Kong (The Land), Matt Dinniman (Dungeon Crawler Carl) or Sarah J. Maas (Throne of Glass), I’m fascinated by where these extraordinary ideas come from.
Philip K. Dick was open about his temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and Enid Blyton is also believed to have had TLE. People with TLE are much more likely to experience mystical experiences, precognition and other altered states of consciousness—or perhaps act as an antenna that can operate at different frequencies from other people.
Gamma brainwaves also likely play a role, along with other unusual electrical activity within the brains of people with TLE. This would, in turn, influence the water in their brains.
Now you’ll begin to see where this post is going, and why water is such an interesting and important molecule if we consider its potential abilities as an antenna.
Fundamentally, like many people, I want to experience things such as lucid dreams, ‘eureka moments’, downloads, joy, telepathy, bliss, remote viewing or simply focus. I like to try to learn the science too, but, like most people, it is the experiences I am seeking.
If you are interested in attending one of my retreats in France, there are still spaces. The details and brochures are on the website and if you have questions or would like to come please book a zoom call.
I met Lionel David in the South of France in 2024, and he is a CGI expert and also an artist. I have found that using arts and crafts was easier for me than using scientific diagrams or equations when I began to understand biogeometry. Many people, including me, find Dan Winter’s theory hard to understand or explain to others, even if the practical side is reasonably straight forward to do.
This is why using a different teaching method is very useful, and children and adults alike enjoy making things or ‘creating’.
Here is a picture of one of Lionel’s many biogeometry, or ‘golden-ratio charge-collapse’, lamps.
My colleague Lionel and I are hosting a free Zoom webinar with Q&A on:
🔹 Geometry, Charge Collapse, Water & Consciousness 🔹
Lionel has studied Biogeometry in far greater depth than I have and explains these fascinating concepts with brilliant visuals that make complex ideas much easier to understand.
📅 Monday July 27th
🕕 6 pm UK | 7 pm CET | 1 pm EST
Recording available if you can’t make it or want to re-watch.
This is one of Lionel's paintings, and several people have reported experiencing quite profound altered states of consciousness while meditating and looking at it. He can also share the mystical experiences during the Zoom.
As we know, water is a dipole because the charge distribution across the molecule is uneven. The oxygen atom carries a partial negative charge because it is more electronegative, while the two hydrogen atoms carry a net partial positive charge. This separation of charge gives water many of its remarkable properties.
We learned this in school and were told that this is how water forms hydrogen bonds, which is true. School and university leave out the interesting parts of science and do a very good job of making science boring and not relevant to daily life, unless you want a career in science. As most of you know a lot of what is taught is incorrect and only half the story is told.
For example;
4th phase water
Deuterium and heavy or light water
Negentropy
This to some is even more ridiculous than water having memory or water being a battery. These days the more ridiculous an idea sounds, the more likely I am to take an interest.
Most of us were taught that water is simply individual H₂O molecules floating around randomly. Modern water research suggests something much more interesting, and that water has many unusual properties.
For example, Martin Chaplin states on his website:
“As a gas, water is one of the lightest known; as a liquid it is much denser than expected; and as a solid it is much lighter than expected when compared with its liquid form. It can be extremely slippery and extremely sticky at the same time, and this ‘stick/slip’ behaviour is how we recognise the feel of water.”
Martin Chaplin approaches the study of water from the perspective of chemistry and experimental measurements.
His work suggests that water repeatedly forms dynamic clusters with pentagonal, dodecahedral and icosahedral geometry.
The icosahedral symmetry of water molecules was first proposed in 1998 and was later supported by X-ray diffraction studies in 2001.
Martin Chaplin explains:
“This structuring accommodates explanation of many of the anomalous properties of water including its temperature-density and pressure-viscosity behaviour, the radial distribution pattern, the presence of both cyclic pentamers and hexamers, the change in properties on supercooling and the solvation and hydration properties of ions, hydrophobic molecules, carbohydrates and macromolecules.”
Water naturally forms dynamic geometric patterns rather than existing simply as isolated molecules. It is continually moving in and out of clusters with five-fold symmetry, including dodecahedral and icosahedral arrangements (I will get to these in a moment).
Martin Chaplin has done extensive work on water structure and hydrogen bonding, so it is this type of work I am referring to here. I have included an image below in case this is a new concept for you.
Water is constantly organising itself into temporary geometric networks through hydrogen bonding. These structures are dynamic rather than permanent.
Like a flock of birds or a shoal of fish moving in coherence and continually changing shape, the organisation itself may be biologically important.
The important idea is not that these structures are permanent, but that certain geometric patterns repeatedly emerge because they are energetically favourable (at lower entropy and higher negentropy).
If we consider a whirlpool in a river, the individual water molecules are always changing, yet the overall pattern or geometry of the whirlpool remains pretty much the same.
Because these structures are constantly changing continually dissolving and reorganising, this is one of the arguments often used by people who dismiss structured water as “woo-woo bullshit”, because these structures are not permanent or static or there all the time.
However, this misses the point. The important feature is not that individual molecular arrangements persist indefinitely, but that water continually self-organises into preferred geometries that are part of the reason water performs certain interesting functions, especially in our brain.
Our reality is always continually dissolving, changing and reorganising. Which is what the 3rd law of Yin Yang describes too.
In fact, water molecules themselves are not static. The hydrogen atoms are constantly exchanging between water molecules—they do not stay together permanently. This occurs through a process known as protonation and deprotonation (H⁺ is a proton).
The average time that the atoms within a water molecule remain together is around 1 millisecond, yet the larger organisation of water can persist despite this continual molecular turnover.
Emilio Del Giudice, using quantum electrodynamics (QED), proposed that liquid water forms coherent domains—regions around 100 nanometres across in which millions of water molecules oscillate together in phase with a self-trapped electromagnetic field.
Although Chaplin’s and Del Giudice’s models differ in important ways, both suggest that the long-term organisation of water is not maintained by permanent hydrogen bonds, but by larger-scale collective organisation.
When sunlight strikes water, or when water inside the body is exposed to infrared light and ultraviolet light, these coherent domains are expand (Dr Pollacks work) and millions of electrons are liberated. We could think of this as higher-energy water, or what many people simply refer to as living water.
Remember that when we are exposed to cold cells emit UV light and during ‘bliss state’ DNA changes structure and emits UV light and longitudinal waves.
This idea—that water continually organises itself into coherent geometric patterns rather than existing as isolated molecules—provides the foundation for the next question:
This happens because of the hydrogen-bonding network and echoes Plato’s association of the icosahedron with the element of water, representing an interesting convergence between ancient wisdom and modern science.
I have included an image of the Platonic solids above. This can open up a huge tangent and rabbit hole, as it is one of the reasons I believe the Periodic Table is taught incorrectly in many chemistry lessons.
As I explain this in my own way, remember that I am not a mathematician or physicist. I want to show you how the dodecahedron and icosahedron relate to charge collapse by beginning with the basics.
My aim over time is to show how I take complex theoretical work, such as Dan Winter’s, and translate it into practical concepts that people can understand and apply. Charge collapse with golden ratio harmonics, according to Dan’s theory, is life, consciousness, and gravity.
“Water follows magnetism; magnetism follows symmetry; symmetry follows implosion; implosion follows awareness; awareness follows water” - Dan Winter
Lionel made this image to show you the golden ratio vortex inside a dodecahedron and how these are linked. The 2nd image is of the ‘two pinecones kissing noses’ or charge collapse.
This is the beginning of a project, so I thought I would share the early GIFs. The resolution is not good as Substack has size limitations, but we have better ones.
This geometry may give water the ability to receive, organise and distribute information, allowing it to function as a fractal antenna. Like a radio antenna resonating with specific frequencies, water may also resonate with patterns in its environment.
Because fractal geometry repeats across multiple scales, water interacts with and changes in light, electromagnetic fields, magneticagnetic fields, non-Hertzian frequencies (subtle energies and longitudinal/scalar waves). Temperature, pressure, dissolved minerals, movement, biological molecules also change the properties and geometry of water.
Golden Ratio (φ) geometry appears throughout nature, and coherent electromagnetic waves that are in phase and compress according to Golden Ratio relationships (for example, sunlight) creates coherent field conditions that increase order within water, thus order in the organism or person.
More Coherence = Better Health & Function
The human body is predominantly water by molecular count, with billions of water molecules surrounding proteins, DNA and other cellular structures.
In previous Substack I have described how the geometry and coherence of water around a given molecule (the hydration shell) such as magnesium or mercury, changes how the molecule behaves; for example does the magnesium or mercury stay in the body or leave?
Freezing experiments by Veda Austin show that water exposed to different environmental conditions produces distinct crystal patterns, with more ordered water forming increasingly symmetrical structures.
Credit: Veda Austin
One of the most fascinating aspects of Veda Austin’s work is her observation that water appears to respond not only to physical environmental influences, but also to intention, symbols, emotions and consciousness. Through thousands of freezing experiments, she has reported that water often forms ice crystal patterns that seem to reflect the question being asked or the intention directed towards it.
I have done some of the freezing in petri dishes and it is something we will do in France at our retreats, but anybody can do Veda’s water freezing work.
Veda frequently describes this process as a conversation with water. Rather than simply freezing randomly, the crystal patterns often appear to answer, mirror or respond symbolically to the experiment taking place.
Whether these observations represent an unknown physical process, a property of consciousness itself or another mechanism entirely remains open to interpretation, but they invite us to ask a profound question.
Could consciousness influence water, and could water, in turn, communicate information back to us through its changing geometry?
If consciousness is more fundamental than the brain, and if water can receive, organise and express information through dynamic geometric patterns (by changing shape), then water is an active participant in the communication of information and consciousness throughout living systems.
Similarly, water placed on geometrically designed antennas based on Golden Ratio proportions has been reported to produce more ordered crystal patterns.
This has been interpreted as evidence that geometry can influence water’s organisation through coherent field effects, consistent with the concept of water acting as a fractal, resonant antenna.
I do think we live in a conscious universe, and agree with Bentov that it’s a matter of different levels of consciousness or perception. You might think something completely different.
Dan Winter proposes that consciousness is related to the successful implosion of charge into increasingly coherent Golden Ratio geometries.
At first glance, this may seem very different from work on dissipative structures. However, I don’t think they are necessarily describing different phenomena.
Dissipative structures, first described by Ilya Prigogine, are systems that maintain or increase their organisation by continuously exchanging energy with their environment rather than existing at equilibrium. Living organisms are classic examples and water as you just learned.
They are describing the same underlying biological process using different scientific languages.
One emphasises charge collapse and coherent geometry, the other dissipative structures and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. In both cases, ‘life’ is viewed as an active process of continuously organising energy, information and matter.
👉🏼Retreats In France Sept & Oct
👉🏼Quantum Starter Kit Course (£22/$29)
🔹 Geometry, Charge Collapse, Water & Consciousness Webinar + Q&A - July 27th
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.