Welcome to Live Fire, the series I wanted to call Fuck the Noise, Do the Thing, because that’s the entire point: stop reading about go-to-market and go produce a result.
Your reply rates used to be fine. Now they’re not.
You’re sending the same volume. Maybe more. The sequences look right, the copy reads clean, but the meetings aren’t landing the way they used to. And somewhere in the back of your head a quiet thought has been getting louder. I don’t think these are the right people.
You’re probably right.
You’re not crazy
Here’s the part nobody says out loud. Targeting is where most outbound quietly bleeds out. Not the subject line. Not the CTA. The list. You can write the best email of your career, send it to the wrong 2,000 people, and it will do nothing, and then you’ll spend three weeks blaming the email.
(If you want the long version of why your ICP keeps lying to you, start here: Beyond the ICP: A Guide to Pain-Based Segmentation. Otherwise stay with me. This costs you an hour, and it’s worth it.)
A 20-second gut check before you spend the hour
When outbound stops working, it’s almost always one of three things.
Bad list. You’re reaching people who don’t have the problem you solve, or don’t have it badly enough to do anything about it.
Bad message. You’re reaching the right people, but you’re leading with you instead of them.
Too slow. Right people, right message, but you showed up after the moment already passed.
Now read those again. If your message hasn’t changed and your speed hasn’t changed, but the results have, it isn’t three and it isn’t two. It’s the list. The market moved and your targeting stayed put.
That’s the whole diagnosis. You don’t need a forty-question audit. You found this post because you already suspected it. At this point it doesn’t matter if you’re 100% sure. You’ve made the call. It costs you an hour.
Why the right list is so hard to find
Here’s the thing underneath the thing.
Companies switch their providers, software, banking, legal, telecom, roughly once every five years. Do that math and only about 20% of your market is in play in any given year, and only about 5% in any given quarter. Professor John Dawes at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute put the number on it, and once you see it you can’t unsee it.
Five percent. That’s the pond everyone is fishing in.
If your market is 10,000 accounts, roughly 500 are actively shopping right now. Your competitors are chasing the same 500. Your marketing team is chasing the same 500. Your agency is chasing the same 500. This is where inbound works beautifully and where everybody is already optimized to win. It’s also a ceiling.
The opportunity isn’t in the 5%. It’s in the roughly 15% that has the problem you solve right now and just hasn’t started shopping yet. Real pain, quiet inbox. Nobody’s emailing them about it because nobody’s bothered to find them. You can’t buy that list. You have to build it, by finding the companies where a specific painful condition is already true, using data sitting in public view.
That’s pain-based segmentation. (The full argument, including why those early meetings are structurally different from inbound, is in The 5% Problem. Worth your time after this.)
In the next hour, you’re going to build your first one.
What you’ll walk away with
Let’s be binary about it.
By the end of this hour, you will have a clear yes or no answer to one question: are there pain segments in your market that will out-produce your current ICP?
And if the answer is yes, you’ll have those segments scored and ranked by how likely they are to book you meetings. Not a vibe. A list you can hand to your SDRs on Monday.
What you’ll need (5 minutes to gather)
Grab these before you start. Nothing here requires digging.
What you sell, in two or three plain sentences.
Your current ICP. Job title, company size, industry. The filter you use today.
Your average deal size. Rough is fine.
The problem you solve. This is the gun to your head problem. The one problem your product or service solves no matter what.
An hour and a clear head. An AI assistant helps with the research, but the thinking here is yours.
That’s it. Let’s go.
The exercise: four moves
Here’s the exercise. In the next hour, you’ll take one company, yours, and find the single piece of public data that proves a buyer has the problem you solve, right now. You’ll turn that into three or four sharp pain segments, score them, and walk away knowing whether your targeting is the reason your outbound is slipping. No tools, no prompts, no theory, just you, one company, and an answer you didn’t have this morning.
We’re not going to hand you a tool for this. We’re going to teach you to think the way the methodology thinks, on one company, by hand. That’s the point. The tools come later, and they’re only worth anything because this part is sound.
Four moves. Work them in order. We’ll show you each one on a real company, Texada, an equipment rental software business, so you can see what “good” looks like before you do your own.
Move 1 — Name the pain you actually solve
Forget your ICP for a second. Forget titles and company size. Answer one question in plain words: what painful problem does your product make go away, and what has to be true inside a company for that pain to be sharp right now, not someday? Write down the top three conditions.
Texada: The pain isn’t “they need better software.” It’s “their equipment is sitting idle, and every idle day is revenue they will never get back.” That’s the pain. The software is just the fix.
Move 2 — Find your line in the sand
Now find the single number that separates a company that’s fine from a company that’s in trouble. The metric that flips you from nice-to-have to must-have the moment they cross it. We call it the Existential Data Point. There’s almost always one that matters more than all the others, and when you find it you’ll know, because it comes with a real consequence. A deadline. A fine. Lost revenue. Someone’s job.
Texada: The EDP is 60% equipment utilization. Above it, healthy. Below it, bleeding cash. One number. Everything else hangs off it.
Move 3 — Split your market by where they sit on that line
Here’s where it gets good. Most people have one ICP. You’re about to have three or four sharper targets. Sort your market by where companies fall relative to your EDP. Each group is in a different kind of pain, which means each one needs a different conversation.
Texada: The 60% line creates three. Below 60%, bleeding cash, act now. Between 60 and 70%, the Goldilocks zone, optimize. Above 70%, capacity constrained, a completely different problem (they need to expand, not trim). Three segments. Three messages. One number made all of them.
Move 4 — Score them, then face the data
For each segment, gut-check three things. How bad is the pain. How likely are they to take a meeting. Is the deal big enough to be worth the effort. High, medium, low is plenty.
Then the question that decides everything: can you actually find these companies in public data? Not buy a list. Find them, one real company at a time, because something public proves the pain is true for that specific company. A permit. An enforcement action. A filing. A recall. A job posting. That proof has a name in the methodology. It’s a Data Key. A segment you can’t find is a daydream. A segment with a Data Key is a campaign.
Now read your verdict
Look at your ranked list. The best segments are high pain, likely to take a meeting, and worth the deal size, with a Data Key you can actually go get. Strong on one of those is a maybe. Strong on all of them is where you point your team next week.
If even one pain segment beats your current ICP and has a Data Key behind it, you have your answer. Targeting was the problem, and you just found the fix. If nothing beats your ICP, that’s a real answer too, and it’s worth knowing before you blame another email.
What you just did
That hour was the whole idea behind Cannonball, done by hand on a napkin. You threw out the ICP, found an Existential Data Point, built pain segments off it, and pressure-tested them against public data. No personas. No guessing. Pain you can prove.
Doing it once, on one company, by hand, is the lesson. Doing it on every vertical you sell into, systematically, with a Data Key that proves the pain company by company, is the system.
That system is the Finding Hidden Customers prompt library, the implementation layer behind everything you just did. It’s the same four-move logic, productized into a tested chain and run on real data. And tested is the word. We’ve put it through hundreds of brands over the past year, very often live and on stage with the clock running. (Last week alone, roughly twenty brands in a single week across Copenhagen and Berlin. Stressful every time. It holds up every time.) Paid subscribers get the full chain. The Finding Hidden Customers agent runs the whole thing in one pass.
Process over prompts. You just proved it. The prompts only matter because the process underneath them is sound, and you now own the process.
Want to see it worked end to end on a real company, with the economics attached? Read Pain-Based Segmentation: The $135M Opportunity for DISCO.
You found the right people. The next question is what on earth to say to them so they actually reply. That’s the next exercise.
New here? Start with the Cannonball GTM methodology · Finding Hidden Customers: The Playbook · The Outbound Campaign Testing Bible
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.