Pat Condell

Here is how Wiki describes Pat Condell, a favorite commentator and comedian of mine:

=====
Patrick Condell (born 23 November 1949) is a British writer, polemicist, and former stand-up comedian. In his early career, he wrote and performed in alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in London, winning the Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1’s Loose Talk program.

In early 2007, Condell began uploading videos on the internet, consisting of monologue polemics primarily about religious authority, authoritarianism in government and left-wing politics, and notably criticism of Islam and the societal effects of Muslim immigration into Western Europe. His videos have also been published on DVD, and as a book of video transcripts.

Pat Condell, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Condell
=====

So this morning someone posted a video by Brit Pat Condell titled “A Word To Rioting Muslims.” I have been watching his videos for the better part of 15 years but haven’t seen any new videos in the last few years. Condell has long been an advocate for free speech and also a critic of what I call “Political Islam.” He also has a rather incisive “dry” sense of humor. I thought this was a new video but it turns out he produced it nearly 14 years ago. I’m sharing it because it is probably more relevant today then when he first produced it. And while I tend to be more diplomatic, toward the Muslim Community, I do agree with every word he speaks in this video.

=====
Well, once again we see multiple violent tantrums from the religion of permanent offence. Some things never change, do they?

Once again we see Islam self-detonate (if you’ll pardon the expression) and show once again why it’s about as welcome on this planet as an asteroid.

Once again we see thousands of Islamic nutcases take time out from beating up their wives to show their sensitive side. How? By smashing up the towns they live in, egged on by clerical ignoramuses whose motives are even lower than the literacy level of their followers. And once again we in the civilised world are being urged to censor ourselves out of respect for a religion that violates the human rights of half the people on the planet and that doubles as a political ideology indistinguishable from Nazism.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so obscene. Or should that be the other way round?

To call these riots infantile and imbecilic is to give them a dignity they don’t deserve. They can only be described as Islamic.

Let me get this straight. We’re supposed to show tolerance and respect for a religion that doesn’t know the meaning of either word, and goes out of its way to prove it every day?

We’re supposed to amend our values to accommodate a religion that accommodates nothing and nobody? Dream on, people. It’s not going to happen, because with Islam it’s always a one way street. We’ve learned that lesson the hard way. We can’t afford any more tolerance and respect. We’ve been sucked dry. And we’ve become weary of manufactured Islamic grievance. It’s such a bore that now when we hear some bearded buffoon or some bag-headed bimbo telling us how offended they are, we can’t even be bothered to laugh any more. Not even when the Turkish prime minister hilariously demands that Islamophobia now be recognised as a crime against humanity, when, given its track record, there’s a much stronger case for making Islam a crime against humanity.

Besides, Turkey is already hypocritically guilty of one of the greatest crimes against humanity in history, the Armenian genocide, a crime it doesn’t even have the balls to admit to.

When Muslims start showing the same level of outrage about things that are genuinely offensive, like the thousands of women and girls who are murdered, mutilated and raped every year in their countries, then we might start taking them a bit more seriously. As it is, there is nothing on this planet less deserving of sympathy or respect than Muslim outrage.

Indeed, there’s something deeply comical about it. It’s so contrived and so cringingly un-self aware it’s impossible to take seriously, even if we wanted to. And nobody in their right mind wants to any more.

There was a time when Islam was given the benefit of the doubt by many people in the West. Now we think it’s poison and we wish we had never heard of it, because twenty years of baseless grievance mongering and kneejerk offence have shown us this religion for what it really is, and now we don’t like it, we don’t trust it, and we’re never going to respect it - and we don’t care how Muslims feel about that.

Everything is an insult to this religion. Everything causes offence. Well nobody gives a damn any more, people. You’ve done it to death. You’ve killed the goose that laid the golden egg. So now, if you’re an offended Muslim, go and stick your head in the oven for all we care.

And if you think that if you keep up the violence the West will eventually cave in, it’s not going to happen. Even if the politicians want it to, the people won’t allow it. We’ll carry on speaking our minds openly and freely because it’s our birthright, and it can’t be taken away from us, it can only be given away, and we’re giving Islam nothing, because Islam gives us nothing. It’s a religion permanently on the take. Gimme gimme gimme is all we ever hear. Give me respect, even though I haven’t earned it. Give me special treatment, or I’ll be offended and you’ll be a racist.

Well, we’re sick and tired of hearing it, we’re sick and tired of Islam, and we’re sick and tired of the needless conflict and intimidation that comes from this religion at every turn.

All week we’ve heard Muslims telling us that we in the West need to understand how important the Prophet is to them. We do understand it and we don’t care. That’s the point. We don’t care now, and we’re never going to care. Get used to it.

We don’t give a damn about your feelings. Our feelings are more important. And our feelings tell us that we’re sick to the back teeth of hearing about your religion, so stick a sock in it.

And no amount of violence is going to change a thing. The more you riot and scream and shout the less we’re going to listen. It will simply stiffen our resolve not to be bullied and pushed around by people whose values we don’t respect because you’ve given us no reason to respect them, and, more to the point, because you’re incapable of giving us such a reason.

In short, we will not be told what we can and cannot say. Not by you, not by anybody. Not now, not ever. No matter how many flags you burn, no matter how many embassies you attack, free speech will prevail, and you’ll suck it up and like it.

A Word To Rioting Muslims(09/20/2012)

=====

At any rate I wrote him, asking if he had a transcript for the video and he was kind enough to provide. Below you will find a link to all of his YouTube videos which seems to have ceased about a year ago: most probably because that was about the time many of us stopped posting our videos on the YouTube platform.

Condell's video Welcome to Saudi Britain was removed by YouTube early in October 2008, but reinstated shortly after. In it Condell criticises Britain's sanctioning of a Sharia court, and refers to the entire country of Saudi Arabia as "mentally ill" for its abuse of women.^[6] A YouTube spokesman said "YouTube has clear policies that prohibit inappropriate content on the site, such as pornography, gratuitous violence or hate speech.... If users repeatedly break these rules we disable their accounts." The National Secular Society was among the complainants to YouTube, saying "as usual, he (Condell) does not mince his words, but he is not saying anything that is untrue. His main thrust is one of outrage on behalf of those Muslim women who will suffer because they are forced to have their marital problems solved in a male-dominated Sharia court."^[6] Condell believed that it was removed due to a flagging campaign by Islamic activists.^[11] YouTube also briefly removed Condell's video Godless and Free but then restored it, emailing Condell and explaining that it had been removed erroneously.

And that was because it was about the same time YouTube began the campaign of massive censorship of Anti-Globalist viewpoints. What is the point of posting videos to YouTube when they just censor and remove it? If you like his dry sense of humor you will find hundreds of his videos at this link.

=====
Pat Condell, YouTube (2007 - 2025)
https://www.youtube.com/@patcondell/videos
=====

And here is the first YouTube video he did on YouTube back in 2007: also on the subject of Islam.

=====
Hi, I’d like to say a few things about Islam, if I may. Here in the UK, religion was always pretty dormant until Muslims came along and started burning books and passing death sentences and generally demanding special treatment for no good reason. But they’ve shown everybody else what can be achieved by bullying and intimidation, so now every crackpot in the country feels entitled to respect for their precious beliefs; beliefs often lifted wholesale from the ramblings of some ancient desert nomad with a psychological disorder. It does seem quite ironic to me that the very people who have clearly made no attempt to think for themselves are always the most vocal in demanding respect for their ideas. But some Muslims go further than this and claim that they’re being victimized in British society, but I don’t really believe that’s true. I do think that a lot of people are getting fed up with hearing about Muslims all the time, and they wish that Muslims would just shut up and get on with their lives

instead of constantly bellyaching about nothing, but that’s not the same as being victimized. But because we live in a liberal democracy and therefore have certain double standards to maintain any criticism of Islam or Muslims always draws the immediate accusation of Islamophobia, a dishonest word which seeks to portray legitimate comment as some kind of hate crime, when the truth is that Islam has a chip on its shoulder the size of a mosque, and it looks to take offence at every opportunity.

Some Muslims, it seems, are almost permanently offended about something or other, and yet you never hear a peep out of any of these people when some young Muslim girl is murdered for bringing dishonor upon her insane family. Suddenly everyone’s looking at the floor then. They keep telling us that Islam is a religion of peace but all the evidence points to a religion of war. It’s holy book urges Muslims to conquer the world and subjugate everyone to the rule of God. If Islam had its way, elections would become a thing of the past and the rest of us would be living in the past for the foreseeable future. And some people are very keen to bring this situation about, especially the loud-mouthed, rabble-rousing Islamic clerics who we always hear praising the suicide bombers as glorious martyrs. Yet curiously, you never hear about any of these enthusiasts blowing themselves up for the glory of God. They’re always very keen to delegate that particular honor. Despite the guarantee of all those luscious virgins waiting for them in Heaven, these guys are so selfless that they can always find somebody more deserving. Now of course the whole 72 virgins scenario has become something of a comedy staple, and with good reason, but it does have one serious problem, and that is that the virgins are likely to be good wholesome Islamic virgins, because there won’t be any infidel riff-raff in Heaven. So presumably they’ll have brothers and cousins and uncles who are all determined to defend their honor by killing anyone who makes eye contact with them.

They haven’t really thought this whole thing through, it seems to me. For this they blow themselves up? Wouldn’t it be easier just to get an inflatable woman and blow her up? And then if one of your friends happens to glance at her with lustful eyes you can simply stone her to death and get another one in the usual way. Also, I think Muslim women in Britain who cover their faces are mentally ill. I realize that in some parts of the world women don’t actually have any choice in this matter, governed, as they are, by primitive pigs whose only achievement in life is to be born with a penis in one hand and a Koran in the other. But it just seems to me that if God had intended you to cover your face then, in his wisdom, he would have provided you with a flap of skin for the purpose. Of course, if it gave you any sexual pleasure, it would have to be removed; that goes without saying. But I don’t want to be too hard on Islam here, for two reasons. Firstly, because I don’t want to be murdered by some hysterical, self-righteous carpet-chewing book-burning Muppet with shit for brains. And secondly, I think we do need to make allowances for Islam because we have to remember that it is quite a young religion, so maybe right now it’s just going through a difficult age; a little headstrong, full of itself, thinks it knows all the answers, but I’m sure it will learn. I think years from now a lot of intelligent Muslims will be looking back on all this medievalism and jihad nonsense with embarrassment and shame, like the Germans do with the Nazis, and maybe then we can all have a good laugh about it, but in the meantime, I think any religion that demands earthly vengeance and retribution for any reason, is not really a religion at all, but an illness, and should be treated as such. Peace, and I mean that most sincerely.

The Trouble With Islam (03/16/2007)

=====

I also asked if he wanted to do a podcast with me so we might discuss the escalating problems with Political Islam on “both side of the pond.” But he declined the offer which I respectfully understand. I also asked him what he thought about Globalist Prime Minister Starmer and which candidate he favored more: Farage or Lowe. Personally I think Lowe is the better choice. If Pat responds I will also include that.

Anyway my readers deserve some comic relief and I think Pat Condell delivers.

Did you know that PM Keir Starmer was an executive member of the Globalist Fabian Society

If you have been reading my essays I write from the perspective of an Anti-Globalist. And the Fabian Society is one of the lesser known globalist organizations though it has supplied every Labor Prime Minister in history for Great Britain. 141 of 411 Labor MPs are members. And as if to state the obvious their coat of arms is -- wait for it -- a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

=====
The Fabian Society has supplied every Labor Prime Minister in history. 141 of 411 Labor MPs are members. More than half the cabinet. And they’ll tell you all of this themselves — it’s on their website. Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep’s clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank — and the organization most people have never heard of. Their strategy, which they openly called “permeation,” was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labor’s constitution, and traced a direct pipeline from pamphlet to law that still operates today. But the part they’d rather you didn’t examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilization and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society’s council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it. And the man who tried to warn you? George Orwell. His teacher at Eton was Aldous Huxley — whose brother Julian coined the term “transhumanism” and ran the Eugenics Society. Orwell gave one lecture to the Fabians. They rewrote his words without permission. He spent the rest of his life writing about exactly that. Every claim in this video is sourced from the Fabians’ own publications, verified historical records, and primary documents. This is not a conspiracy theory. It’s their own words.

The Secret Society Running Britain for 140 Years (03/28/2026)

=====

Here is another interesting take on the Fabian Society.

=====
Socialism Part 9: Fabian Society: Wolves in Sheep Clothing w/ Michael Greaney (09/02/2020)

=====

And here is a comprehensive background on Keir Starmer from Wiki.

=====
* Starmer has proven unpopular with the British public. His net approval rating began slightly positive, falling over the course of his premiership to an average of –46% by November 2025; an Ipsos poll that month indicated he was the least popular prime minister since its records began in 1977.

* Starmer led Labor to a landslide victory at the 2024 general election, ending 14 years of Conservative government with the smallest vote share of any majority government since record-keeping began in 1830.

Keir Starmer, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keir_Starmer
=====

Up until today I never really understood the influence of the Fabian Society on British politics but it does explain a lot: the push for Climate Change, the acceptance of Mass Muslim immigration into the United Kingdom etc. All of these agendas are planks of virtually all globalist organizations: the UN, the WHO, the WEF etc. And it also explains the insanity of Keir Starmer who has yet to stop the mass immigration of Muslims into Great Britain. He doesn’t seem to care that his country is on the verge of civil war as a result of these insane immigration policies. Here is the 30 page pamphlet he wrote for the Fabian Society back in 2021

=====
The Road Ahead by Keir Starmer for the Fabian Society (September 2021)
https://fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/The-Road-Ahead-KEIR-STARMER_web.pdf
=====

Concluding remarks

My SubStack blog is apparently under attack. On January 6th, 2026, I was permanently banned from Facebook where I have been posting my essays of over 20 years. And then on April 4th, 2026, I was permanently suspended from Musk’s X/Twitter platform. I’m beginning to see a pattern here. Most likely this has occurred because of my series of essays on “The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification” which I began publishing in December of 2025. My best guess is that I pissed off some powerful Islamic Group such as CAIR. It’s just a guess by the way. But I do find it odd that after 20 years, posting to these Social Media Platforms, I get banned from two of the largest platforms within a single month.

There are a number of ways that my readers can help out. One way is to share my essays on all of the major and minor Social Media Platforms. Just cut and paste the links. Another way to help is to become a paid subscriber. I only ask this of those that can afford it. But every penny helps.

I prefer to write long comprehensive essays as I have for 36 years. But I think I will complement that with shorter essays which will allow me to write more essays each month. Goodness knows there are plenty of issues to write about. After this recent suspension from X I’m beginning to feel I’m being targeted for my Anti-Globalist viewpoints. But I do enjoy sharing my thoughts through my essays and have no intention of stopping. I’m beginning work on two essays: The birthright citizenship issue before the Supreme Court and the SAVE Act which seems to have died in the Senate. What they both have in common is they are both what we call 80/20 issues: the vast majority of Americans support both actions. And unless both of them are enacted it just points out the obvious: we are now a Democratic Republic in name only. This notion of a republic “by, for and of” the American People appears to be fading along with free speech, privacy and other inalienable rights. At some point we may have to take to the streets to remedy this sad trend.