Why invading Iran was unavoidable

On January 6th, 2026, Facebook (aka Fascist Book) accused me of hate speech for my 460 page series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. This series got me permanently banned from Fascist Book after I’ve been on that platform for over 20 years. They accused me of “hate speech” which is not accurate at all. De-Islamification -- taking away the special privileges from the Muslim population -- is now happening throughout the planet. And I think this is necessary to nudge our Muslim populations to assimilate to the values of our society. There was nothing controversial about this series of essays. I was merely calling attention to what is already happening throughout the world and merely coined a term to describe it: De-Islamification. This is a very important series of essays from the perspective of someone who has lived for 72 years in Dearborn which has now recently become a Muslim majority city. Dearborn has become radicalized since the 10/07/2023 Israeli massacre and the subsequent invasion of Gaza. This has resulted in radicalized Muslims calling for the genocide of Israel -- from the river to the sea -- and openly public calls for the “death of America.” This can only be stopped through forcing assimilation of the Muslim community -- through De-Islamification.

There was no impartial judge or jury when I was permanently banned from Facebook. I was not even told which post got me flagged for this alleged “hate speech.” The only reason I knew was because it was the only essay I was posting at the time. I was not afforded my 6th Amendment right to face my accuser. In fact I will never know who my accuser was, though I do have my suspicions: CAIR or some other Islamic Jihadi group. The only thing that is crystal clear is that Facebook has long been censoring Anti-Globalist Speech, which was specifically evident during the Plandemic (2020-2023). They say they are enforcing “community standards” when what they are really doing is censoring anything that challenges the broader globalist agenda. And certainly Immigration, and more specifically Muslim immigration, has been part of the globalist agenda for at least the last 3 decades. So obviously I was not banned from Facebook by some average disgruntled woke activist. I was banned because I upset someone with a lot of power and someone that had the power to make Facebook act. Anyway the entire series is free to read and is about 460 pages in length.

=====
Because we have allowed our national leaders to push this Mass Muslim Immigration, into First World nations, we have now reached a critical point. Cities like London and Paris have become Muslim ghettos where the indigenous populations are feeling unsafe to enter. Muslim enclaves, like Epic City in Texas, are fast becoming parallel segregated Muslim societies unto themselves. Thankfully the world is waking up to the existential threat of Political Islam.

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 7
Muslims want a Global Muslim Caliphate Antithetical to our Constitutional Republic

The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification Part 6
Ending Soft Sharia Laws in Dearborn Michigan and other US Cities

The remaining series of essays can by found here:

Bruce Cain’s Anti-Globalist Newsletter

=====

If you get a chance to read through it share your thoughts in the comments of each essay. And for those that do read the series I’m quite certain you will reach the same conclusion that I did:

This need to confront this existential Islamic threat is shared by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Gad Saad and many others.

=====
Ayaan Hirsi Ali joins Liz Truss to discuss Islamism, immigration, free speech, Europe’s political crisis, Britain’s future, and whether the West still has the confidence to defend its own values. Born in Somalia in 1969, Ayaan Hirsi Ali later served in the Dutch Parliament and is now a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. In this interview, she reflects on her upbringing, her break with Islam, her critique of Islamism, and why she believes Britain and Europe are failing to confront deep cultural and political challenges.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali Warns Britain: Islamism, Europe and the Collapse of Reality (03/20/2026)

=====

In my series — The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification — I’ve explained how Muslim immigration, and really immigration in general, benefits the Globalist Agenda, whose final goals is to set up a global technocratic society where everything is tracked through either CBDCs or Stable coins. The UN has been pushing Muslim immigration, into First World Countries for decades in order to dilute the national character of these host nations. More recently the growing Red/Green alliance has joined in pushing this agenda for the same reasons.

This is a classic application of the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. We are currently seeing the problem as growing Muslim communities — Dearborn Michigan, Plano Texas (Epic City, the Meadows) etc. — set up parallel segregated communities that begin to implement aspects of Islamic Sharia Law. The reaction has come from Non-Muslims living in or around these Muslim enclaves. They begin to feel increasingly uncomfortable to live in these communities and begin to move out of the area. And the solution will be a cashless society which will begin to monitor and control Muslim extremists. But the reality is it will begin to monitor and control everyone.

Robert Spencer is an expert on Islam. In the following video he basically describes what I have just explained.

=====
”The Islamic Republic of Iran is Shiite and funds Hamas, which is Sunni. 93% of the funding of Hamas comes from the Islamic Republic of Iran. Even though Sunnis and Shia actually hate each other and kill each other when they get the chance, why then would Iran fund Hamas? Because there’s an old Arabic proverb that translates to my brother against my brother, but both of us against our cousin. And so the idea is that the infidel particularly Jews are worse enemies. The Jews are designated as the worst enemies of the Muslims of all in the Quran. And consequently they the Sunni and Shia are happy to work together. Um, also, if I may add another footnote, um, the idea of inundating the West with Muslims creates a win-win situation for the left because it dilutes the national character of the countries in which these people are coming and makes it harder for the native people to defend their own homeland. Because after all, we live in a republic and if we’re outvoted, then we don’t get to set the agenda. And once they have all these Muslims here voting, then it becomes more difficult to elect the people that we want. Emanuel Macron is only president of France because of the Muslim vote. If there were no Muslims in France, he would have lost seven years ago, not to mention more recently. And so uh that’s the first thing. But also the more the Islamic communities increase the more unrest there is between Muslims and non-Muslims because of the violent aggressive supremacist expansionist character of Islam. The shark aspect. And so there’s always going to be violence. It never there has never been a place where Muslims have come in large numbers and did not commit violence against the non-Muslims. Never in human history. We will not be exempt. We will not be the first. And so that unrest is also something that the left wants because then once this once the country is engulfed in street war, they have an excuse to clamp down with their authoritarian measures, which is what they want to do in the long run anyway. And so there’s no downside as far as they’re concerned. The only thing that they haven’t counted on is the fact that ultimately there’s only going to be those two left and then who wins?”

=====

Before getting to the Iranian invasion I’d like to share a video depicting what is going on in Spain where the president has recently moved to legalize between 500,000 and 1.3 million Muslim immigrants. This has led to the rise of the Anti-immigrant VOX party that seeks to deport the Muslim immigrants. In the video the head of the VOX party, Santiago Abascal, confronts the president of Spain for selling out the Spanish people to the Muslims. This same refrain is being heard in Great Britain, Ireland, France and other EU countries where their leaders are also selling out their indigenous populations to Islam. And the same thing is happening in the United States. All of these nations are now moving toward civil war in order to stop the Islamification of their respective countries.

=====
The Spanish Have Had ENOUGH Of Islamist Socialist Takeover (03/27/2026)

=====

=====
The rise of Vox — the voice of Spain’s anti-immigration right (09/24/2025)

A quarter of young people will vote for Vox in next election. The party’s leader issued a rallying cry to fight ‘woke ideology’ and an ‘Islamist invasion’
https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/spain-vox-party-news-frt9dszkp
=====

So it was on February 28th, 2026, that Trump, with the aid of Israel, began launching airstrikes across Iran. Unlike previous incursions -- into Iraq, Libya etc. -- this was executed with surgical precision due to the use of drones, AI and Palantir technologies. For those that are interested in a detailed analysis, of the invasion, I recommend the following Wiki article.

=====
On 28 February 2026, a war began when the United States and Israel launched surprise airstrikes on multiple sites and cities across Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and several other Iranian officials. Iran responded with missile and drone strikes against Israel, US bases, and US-allied countries in the Middle East.

2026 Iran war, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war
=====

While I was mulling over the loss of my Facebook audience I posted the following comment on various SubStack blogs that were against the invasion of Iran.

I was actually surprised by the number of likes and supportive comments I received, given that I was posting to articles that were opposed to invading Iran. So despite the possible blowback from the invasion -- higher gas costs, fertilizer disruption etc. -- a large number of readers seem to think the invasion was justified.

Nationally a majority of Americans opposed a U.S. invasion or major military action against Iran. And while I disagree with the majority I do understand their concerns: higher gas costs, fertilizer disruption, possible troop fatalities, inflation from supply chain disruption. Once again we could not simply wait until Iran had fully developed Nuclear Weapons and ICBM’s to launch at the US or the EU.

=====
As of March 2026, a majority of Americans oppose a U.S. invasion or major military action against Iran, with support ranging from only 27% to 50% depending on the poll, marking unusually low public support for a new conflict. Reuters/Ipsos polls indicate that while many believe a ground invasion is likely, only about 7% to 27% actually support sending ground troops.

Key polling data from March 2026 regarding the Iran conflict:

* Overall Support: A Reuters/Ipsos survey found just 27% support for military strikes, while other surveys showed a range up to 50%.

* Opposition: A majority (53%–56%) of Americans oppose the military actions launched by President Trump.

* Ground Troops: Support for a ground invasion is even lower, with one poll finding only 7% support among all adults, note Reuters/Ipsos.

* Party Divide: YouGov data shows 51% of Republicans supported using military force to overthrow Iran’s leadership, while 69% of Democrats opposed it.

* Comparison: Unlike previous conflicts (e.g., Iraq, Afghanistan) that saw high initial public support, the 2026 Iran military action is broadly unpopular, with 70% in one survey stating the U.S. should not get involved.

Public opinion remains divided by party lines, but initial reactions indicate that the majority of Americans believe the actions have “gone too far”

Google AI [percent of americans supporting invasion of iran in 2026]
=====

As recent as June 2025, polling also showed that 79% of Americans also said that Iran Cannot Get A Nuclear Weapon and a plurality of Americans also favor U.S. Airstrikes on Iran. Among all of this cognitive dissonance is the reality: the only way to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons was to invade. So regardless of the polling I have supported this invasion for decades. Hopefully the use of AI and Palantir technologies will minimize the collateral damage to Iranian citizens: something that would not have been possible in previous years.

=====
Enten: A Clear Majority Of Americans Believe Iran Cannot Get A Nuclear Weapon, Plurality Favor U.S. Airstrikes on Iran

Posted By Ian Schwartz On Date June 18, 2025
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/06/18/enten_a_clear_majority_of_americans_believe_iran_cannot_get_a_nuclear_weapon_plurality_favor_us_airstrikes_on_iran.html
=====

=====
Based on reports as of March 2026, the primary reasons for U.S.-led, Israeli-coordinated strikes against Iran, starting February 28, 2026, were to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, destroy its ballistic missile capabilities, and neutralize its threats to regional allies and U.S. forces. The Trump administration cited an imminent security threat, aiming for a “decisive” dismantling of Iran’s military capacity.

Key Drivers for the 2026 Action:

* Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: The primary goal stated by the Trump administration was to definitively destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

* Neutralizing Missile Threats: Officials claimed the action was necessary to neutralize Iran’s missile and drone capabilities, which were reportedly deemed a direct threat to U.S. forces and Israel.

* Diplomatic Failure: The administration concluded that negotiations had been exhausted, with President Trump stating he believed Iran would not voluntarily cease its nuclear activities.

* Supporting Regional Allies: The strikes aimed to protect Israel and America’s Arab allies from Iranian regional influence.

* Regime Change Messaging: While some officials insisted this was not the direct goal, the administration encouraged Iranian domestic opposition to act, aiming for a change in leadership.

* Preventing Threat Escalation: There was a belief that Iranian missile and interceptor capabilities were increasing, necessitating a pre-emptive strike.

The administration cited “overwhelming strength and devastating force” rather than a long-term occupation.

Google AI [primary reasons for trump invading iran in 2026]
=====

I would add a few addition reasons.

Iran has most certainly been trying to export this barbaric, medieval theocratic ideology through its financing of Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah. I have lived among the Muslims in Dearborn for my entire life -- 72 years. As much as I love my Muslim neighbors it is clear to me that Islam is antithetical to a Constitutional Republic. Under Sharia Law women and Non Muslims are treated as unequal to men. That violates both our Constitution, that treats everyone equal under the law, and the Golden Rule: to treat others as you would want to be treated yourself. It also violates MLK maxim to judge each individual by the content of their character and not by an individuals race, religion or class. Political Islam has but one overarching goal: to establish a Global Muslim Caliphate under Sharia Law. And large swathes of the Muslim population are no longer hiding that goal from us any longer. They are here to dominate, not to assimilate.

=====
Since the beginning of the 2025–2026 Iranian protests, the government of Iran has perpetrated widespread massacres of civilians, deploying both its own security forces and also imported foreign militias to suppress widespread public dissent across the country. As of 25 January 2026, the total death toll estimates ranged from 7,007 people to upwards of ~36,500 people,[3][4][5] including 209 government-affiliated military and non-military personnel,[6] making these among the largest massacres in the modern history of Iran.[7]

Iranian authorities have supposedly imposed a near-total internet shutdown as part of their crackdown on the protests, restricting communication inside the country and limiting the flow of information about the killings to the outside world.[8] On 12 January 2026, Esmaeil Baghayi, the spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, confirmed that security forces had directly shot at protesters.[9]

On 25 January, Time reported that a specific list included 30,304 protest-related deaths registered in civilian hospitals for 8 and 9 January alone.[3] The same day, Iran International estimated the total number of deaths at ~36,500.[4] On 28 January, The Guardian reported that the death toll could be more than 30,000, and that less than 10% of deaths may have been officially registered.[10] AP News reported that the government’s overwhelming use of violence had caused despair among the Iranian public and had given rise to hopes among some citizens for an American attack.[11] Several scholars have argued that the Iranian government now faces a fragile state that could lead to its demise.

2026 Iran massacres, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_massacres
=====

No one should have to live under Sharia Law which has been going on within Iran since it became a Islamic Caliphate in 1979. For me it all comes down to the Golden Rule: treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. No self respecting human would ever want to live under Sharia Law. Sharia Law is not only antithetical to a Constitutional Republic but also to basic human rights. Hopefully, after this invasion, the Iranian people will reject an Islamic Theocracy in favor of a Secular government. Unfortunately this is not addressed in Trump’s 15 point peace plan. But it should be. Here are 10 of the 15 proposed points in Trumps peace plan. I see no requirement for Iran to transition to a secular government.

=====
* Dismantling existing nuclear capabilities that have already been accumulated

* A commitment that Iran will never pursue nuclear weapons

* No material will be enriched on Iranian soil.

* All enriched material will be delivered to Saba on a schedule to be determined by the parties.

* Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow will be decommissioned - destroyed

* The Atomic Energy Agency will be exposed to all information within Iran’s borders.

* Iran will abandon the proxy paradigm

* Stop actually funding and arming the proxies in the region.

* The Strait of Hormuz will remain open, will be a free maritime zone - and no one will block it

* Missile project: There will be a decision later, but they will have to limit the number and range

Further use: For self-defense purposes only

Trump’s 15-point document to end the war in Iran - and the (03/26/2026)
https://www.mako.co.il/news-diplomatic/2026_q1/Article-c55ca8485012d91027.htm
=====

I still recall the Pro Hamas rally, held at the Dearborn Civic Center about a week after Hamas slaughtered 1200 Israeli’s. When one of the Muslim participants said we should also be grieving the 1200 Israeli deaths he was shouted down. What predominated the rally were cries of “from the river to the sea” -- an obvious call for the genocide of the Israeli people. This was following by Red/Green protests across dozens of university campuses and throughout many states. While it is true that both sides of the Red/Green alliance, are unified by these idiot embracing anti-Western regimes and Open Borders, the rot started decades before as left wing curriculums took root in our public school systems. Academic excellence and critical thinking were thrown out the window only to be replaced by socialist globalist ideology: DEI, ESG, LGBTQ, Fake Climate Change. My mother, who taught 4th grade for decades, would be rolling in her grave if she could have truly understood what was happening to public education.

When I wrote about the 12/07 Massacre I quoted Shakespeare: a plague on both your houses. I said that because I do believe Netanyahu allowed the attack to provide an excuse to invade the Gaza strip. But I also criticized Hamas for essentially taking the bait. The last time I looked it appears as many as 77,000 have been killed in Gaza and over 30,000 Iranian protesters were murdered in January 2026. I find it frightening how the Red/Green alliance can’t empathize with all those senselessly murdered. After all are not all lives precious? They also ignore the 200,000 Christians and Moderate Muslims that have been slaughtered in Nigeria since 2010 by Muslim Jihadists. And similar genocidal attacks, by Muslim Jihadists, also continue in the Congo and other African nations.

=====
The modern progressive movement has sacrificed its core values of liberty and secularism to form a strategic partnership with theocratic forces against Western democratic interests. By obsessing over the conflict in Gaza while ignoring the systemic massacres in Tehran, these activists demonstrate an ideological bias that favors anti-Western regimes over actual human rights victims.

This convergence rests on three pillars:

1) Shared Enemy: Both identify the United States and Israel (the “Great Satan” and “Little Satan,” respectively) as the primary obstacles to their utopia.

2) Shared Method: Both advocate for the violent overthrow of existing structures. The Left excuses Islamist terrorism as “armed struggle” or “resistance”.

3) Shared Antisemitism: Marx identified capitalism with Judaism (in On the Jewish Question). Islamists identify Judaism with cosmic evil. The Red-Green alliance creates a seamless fusion where “anti-Zionism” serves as the socially acceptable vehicle for this shared hatred.

The Left’s silence on Iran is a direct requirement of this alliance. You do not criticize your comrades in the trenches. If Hamas and Hezbollah are the “vanguard” of the anti-imperialist struggle, as Butler suggested, then the patron of these groups — the Iranian regime — must remain protected from criticism. Postmodernism dismantled the concept of objective truth, replacing it with “narratives” and “power dynamics.” In this worldview, there are no facts, only “colonial” or “decolonial” perspectives. The Iranian regime murders women for showing hair, whereas the postmodern interpretation suggests that criticizing the hijab law is “Islamophobic” and imposes “Western feminist standards” on a unique culture.

The Great Betrayal: Why the Western Left Ignores Iranian Victims (02/2102026)
https://www.fairobserver.com/politics/the-great-betrayal-why-the-western-left-ignores-iranian-victims/
=====

=====
‘Progressive’ left must stop making excuses for Iran’s tyrants (01/09/2026)

To reduce Iran’s history to conspiracy is not only inaccurate; it is insulting. It dismisses the intelligence and courage of people who have paid an extraordinary price for dissent.
https://www.afr.com/world/middle-east/progressive-left-must-stop-making-excuses-for-iran-s-tyrants-20260108-p5nshh
=====

=====
The political left’s varying focus on Gaza versus Iran often stems from ideological frameworks, where Gaza is viewed through the lens of anti-colonialism and Western-aligned Israeli military action, while issues in Iran are complicated by anti-imperialist solidarity with the regime or fears of promoting Western intervention.

Key factors for this disparity often noted in commentary include:

* Anti-Imperialist Focus: Many on the left prioritize opposition to Western imperialism, viewing Iran as a nation opposing Western dominance, while Israel is seen as a proxy of the U.S..

* Geopolitical Framing: Deaths in Gaza are seen as direct results of U.S.-backed, high-profile military actions, making them central to anti-war activism.

* Information Disparity & Complexity: Iran’s regime restricts information, making domestic deaths, such as during protests, harder to verify and track compared to the immediate, televised nature of conflict in Gaza.

* Fear of Co-option: Progressive activists sometimes fear that highlighting human rights abuses in Iran plays into the hands of right-wing Western powers seeking to intervene against the regime.

* Anti-Colonial Lens: The struggle of Palestinians is overwhelmingly framed on the left as a key anti-colonial fight, creating a moral imperative that often overrides internal regional issues.

Consequently, some critics argue this creates a form of “selective solidarity” or “hypocrisy,” where Iranian lives are disregarded, reducing them to secondary casualties of geopolitics, according to an article in AFR and another article in AFR.

Google AI [why the political left complains about deaths in Gaza but not in Iran]
=====

So just the other week Iran launched ballistic missiles toward Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. This was twice the range our military experts thought that Iran could launch missiles. And this means that much of the EU -- including London and Paris -- are now in range of Iranian missile strikes. That should be terrifying to the EU and begs the question: how long before Iran gets ICBMs capable of striking within the United States.

=====
As of March 2026, Iran launched unexpected, long-range ballistic missiles targeting the U.S./U.K. military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, demonstrating capabilities to reach roughly 2,500 miles—twice their previously declared range. These missiles, which coincided with attacks on Israel and U.S. bases in the Middle East, show increasing, though often unreliable, precision.

Key Detail

* Targeting & Range: The missiles launched around March 20-22, 2026, struck near the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, far exceeding the typical range of Iran’s arsenal.

* Missile Performance: One missile reportedly broke apart, while another was intercepted by U.S. defenses, notes The Conversation.

* Regional Threats: Simultaneous attacks occurred, with missiles striking near a nuclear research center in Israel and targeting U.S. bases in the Middle East, says a YouTube video.

* Significance: Experts note that while the ability to fly that far is not a surprise in terms of physics, it indicates an attempt to threaten areas as far as Europe and Asia.

These developments follow a pattern of intensified, long-range strikes by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Iran shows Europe ‘in reach’ with longest-range ballistic missile launch (03/23/2026)
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-24/iran-longest-ballistic-missiles-launch-range-europe-reach/106485468
=====

I was somewhat surprised by those opposing the invasion of Iran because we have been in agreement on so many other issues. They include Patrick Wood and Barbara Boyd who write extensively about technocracy.

=====
IMEC: Trump’s War With Iran Is About Global Trade. Period.
Don’t fall for any other narrative,,,
Patrick Wood Mar 18, 2026

Cognitive Warfare
WE’VE BEEN LIVING IN A “50-YEAR FINANCIAL EMPIRE BUILT ON OIL, TERRORISM & MANUFACTURED CRISIS” - BARBARA BOYD, PROMETHEAN ACTION

=====

I have no formed opinion about IMEC though, when it comes to profiting from a Presidency, Trump makes the Biden family look like rank amateurs. So the Biden family perhaps made 20 million? Between the Trump Coin, IMEC and so much other crap it appears the Trump family is making billion and nary a word about it. So to be clear I don’t like that as there shouldn’t even be the appearance of such indiscretion or impropriety.

But often many things can be true at the same time. And I fully support the invasion of Iran as they have long been an existential threat to Israel, the US and the entire world. They finance Muslim terrorist groups, they push the Muslim Brotherhoods goal of an Islamic Caliphate and they treat their people like shit. So there’s that. Taking Iran “off the table” will also significantly stop the spread of the Muslim Brotherhood and their goal for an Global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia Law.

Then we have James Corbett of the Corbett report. Again I agree with him on a plethora of issues.

=====
Why Did USrael Attack Iran?
The Corbett Report, Mar 22, 2026
https://brucecain.substack.com/cp/191756949
=====

Corbett teases us with the idea that the War on Iran is really about bringing about the Globalist Great Reset and I think there is truth to that theory. But two things can be true at once. Iran is obviously pushing for a Global Islamic Caliphate through financing proxies such as Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah. And eventually Iran would have eventually had nuclear bombs and ICBMs that could hit the EU and the US. So regardless of the Globalist Agenda I think it was wise to decapitate Iran. And I also find it tiresome, this rise of Right Wing Antisemitism. This notion that Israel controls the US is overstated. We have a very complicated strategic reasons for our relationship with Israel. And even if Israel didn’t exist I still believe the invasion was completely unavoidable. Chamberlin’s appeasement of Nazi Germany didn’t work out well. And the decades of Iranian appeasement -- by both Republicans and Democrats -- stop the movement toward a nuclear Iran.

=====
Right-wing antisemitism has increasingly moved from the fringes to more mainstream conservative discourse, often fueled by nationalist ideologies, anti-globalist conspiracy theories, and populist, anti-elite narratives. Key, identified purveyors include media personalities, political activists, and, at times, political figures who engage in or amplify tropes about Jewish control, “Great Replacement” theory, or Holocaust denial.

Key Figures and Voices

* Nick Fuentes: A prominent white nationalist and internet personality who leads the “America First” (Groyper) movement. He has been documented promoting Holocaust denial and antisemitic conspiracies.

* Stew Peters: A far-right conspiracy theorist podcaster who has been criticized for antisemitic remarks, including promoting Holocaust denial and using hateful rhetoric against Jewish individuals.

* Candace Owens: A media personality who has faced criticism for engaging in rhetoric about a “sinister Jewish gang” in Hollywood, promoting theories that modern Jews are not the biblical descendants of Israel, and downplaying Holocaust atrocities.

* Tucker Carlson: A media commentator who has been accused of amplifying nationalist narratives that lean into “Great Replacement” tropes and providing a platform for antisemitic voices.

* Richard Spencer: A prominent white supremacist who has been a key organizer of white supremacist rallies and a proponent of the “Jews will not replace us” narrative.

* Andrew Anglin: Publisher of The Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website that has actively promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories.

* Jimmy Dore and the Jimmy Dore podcast.

* Glenn Greenwald

Themes and Rhetoric

* “Globalist” Tropes: Using the term “globalists” or “globalist elites” as a dog whistle to blame Jewish people for political and social changes.

* George Soros as Target: Focusing intense, often conspiratorial, rhetoric on Jewish financier George Soros, portraying him as a “puppet master”.

* Great Replacement Theory: A belief that a “ruling class” or “Jewish conspiracy” is replacing white Americans with foreign immigrants.

* Historical Revisionism: The spread of Holocaust denial or downplaying of Nazi atrocities, often circulated on far-right platforms.

Platforms and Networks

* Online Platforms: Sites such as Gab, 4chan, BitChute, and Telegram are major conduits for right-wing antisemitism due to limited content moderation.

* “America First” (Groypers): A movement targeting young people through social media to normalize extremist views.

* Alternative Media: Various podcasts and online news outlets that serve as echo chambers for anti-immigrant and antisemitic conspiracy theories.

Various researchers and civil rights organizations have noted a trend where these types of narratives are increasingly discussed within broader political conversations. This shift has led to concerns regarding the potential for extremist rhetoric to become more normalized in public discourse, impacting how different communities interact and perceive one another.

Google AI [purveyors of right wing antisemitism]
=====

=====
Glenn Greenwald EMBARRASSED as Coleman Hughes Lists The Facts About Iran War! (03/27/2026)

=====

I’m most surprised by Tucker Carlson who has transformed into a Pro-Islamic Cuck . . . much like Gays for Palestine. Suddenly he is favoring Qatar over Israel. Doesn’t he understand the Qatar is spending billions a year to promote Islam in our universities and throughout the United States? Doesn’t he know that Qatar is financing the Muslim Brotherhood whose primary goal is to establish a global Islamic Caliphate under Sharia law? Then again it took this idiot years to consider that 911 was most likely an inside job. I knew it was an inside job at 5:20 PM (09/11/2001) when Building 7 fell into it’s footprint at free fall speeds. The only way that happens is by planting the building with explosive charges . . . something that requires weeks of preparation. Next thing you know he will be wearing a Hijab. Or perhaps he will become a transexual dancing boy for the Qatari elite. Idiot.

=====
Tucker Tells Reporter: America’s Relationship With Qatar Is Infinitely More Important Than Israel (12/30/2025)

=====

=====
Tucker Carlson is one of the most attention-grabbing figures in American politics. For years he was an ardent supporter of Donald Trump, but since the outbreak of the war in Iran he has become one of the president’s most vocal critics. In a conversation with The Economist’s editor-in-chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes, Tucker Carlson discusses the fallout of the Iran war and whether Trump betrayed America First over the Iran war.

Tucker Carlson on whether Trump betrayed America First over the Iran war (03/20/2026)

=====

I think the invasion of Iran was necessary to stop the development of nuclear weapons, ICBMs and a host of other reasons. But perhaps the most important reason is to stop the spread of Islam through the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. Political Islam has no legitimate place in the 21st century. And that is why I spent so much time writing the series of essays: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. The push for Islamic dominance is poisoning the EU, the US and other First World Nations. Through De-Islamification -- denying Muslims and special privileges -- it is my hope the Political Islam will fade and Muslims will have no other choice than to assimilate to the nations they have emigrated to.

And there are some promising developments that will hopefully aid in this process of De-Islamification. With the rise in Anti-immigrant sentiment European Parliament passed new legislation letting member states deport migrants to designated “safe” countries outside the EU. There are also mounting calls for reimmigration (deporting Illegal Aliens) and denaturalization: deporting naturalized citizens that hold anti-American sentiments. President Washington only wanted virtuous immigrants -- those that held Judeo-Christian values. Those that seek the overthrow of our republic have no legitimate place in our country.

=====
European lawmakers cleared the way Thursday for tougher penalties for irregular migrants and their potential deportation to so-called “return hubs” outside the bloc. The measures, criticised by human rights groups, are part of a tightening of Europe’s immigration rules in response to pressure across the 27-nation bloc to curb migration. FRANCE 24’s Dave Keating reports.

‘Return hubs’ for migrants clear EU parliament hurdle (03/26/2026)

=====

=====
European Parliament passed new legislation letting member states deport migrants to designated “safe” countries outside the EU even if they are not from those nations. European lawmakers approved the measure on Tuesday with a vote of 396‑226 as centre and far-right members backed it.

Under the new rules, EU states will be able to send asylum seekers to third countries they merely transited through, provided those countries are deemed to respect “international standards” for migrant treatment. They could also deport asylum seekers to “safe” third countries with which they have no prior ties, if an agreement is reached with the host state, the UK’s Guardian newspaper reported. The rules are expected to take effect in June. The move underlines the rise in anti-immigration sentiment across the European Union over ⁠the past decade that has broadened popular support for far-right parties. The legislation’s text – which requires final formal approval from the 27 EU member governments – marks a sharp hardening of EU migration policy that has taken shape since an influx of more than one million refugees and migrants in 2015-16.

EU votes to allow deportation of migrants to ‘safe’ third countries (02/10/2026)
New rule could be used to send asylum seekers to countries they have no ties to if they’re ‘deemed’ safe.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/10/eu-votes-to-allow-deportation-of-migrants-to-safe-third-countries
=====

Here are the current members of the Sharia Free American Caucus. If your federal representatives are not currently members you should encourage them to join.

=====
The Sharia Free America Caucus is a U.S. House of Representatives caucus launched on December 18, 2025, by Reps. Keith Self (TX-03) and Chip Roy (TX-21). Its stated goal is to combat the spread of Sharia law, which they deem incompatible with the U.S. Constitution, and ensure it holds no sway in American law.

Key Aspects of the Caucus:

* Membership Growth: Launched with a focus on Texas Republicans, the caucus grew to over 50 members from 22 states by late March 2026, including members like Tom Emmer (MN-06), Brandon Gill (TX-26), and Mary Miller (IL-15).

* Core Purpose: Members argue that Sharia law is a “political and legal system” rather than just a personal faith, and argue it poses a threat to American Western values and constitutional sovereignty.

* Proposed Actions: The caucus focuses on legislative action to restrict the influence of Islamic law, including efforts to prevent its adoption in any form within the U.S. legal system.

* Opposition: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has designated the caucus as an “anti-Muslim hate group,” alleging the caucus aims to render the practice of Islam illegal in the US and is a threat to religious freedom.

The caucus has held a press conference featuring Senator Tommy Tuberville and has strong support from Texas conservative members, emphasizing a “no compromise” stance in defense of American law.
=====

=====
During remarks on the floor of the United States House of Representatives, Republican lawmakers Chip Roy and Keith Self spoke about concerns related to Sharia law and what they described as potential threats from radical Islamist ideology in the United States.

‘Make America SHARIA-FREE!’: Chip Roy, Keith Self warn of ‘radical Islamist’ threat at House floor (03/09/2026)

=====

What is even more promising is the Sharia Free America Caucus already has a large number of bills to implement their strategy. If you go to the link you can view each bill.

=====
A new House caucus focused on opposing Sharia law in the United States has expanded to 36 members from 18 states, according to Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), one of its co-founders.

The Sharia Free America Caucus was founded by Self and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) following a conversation with Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) at the White House Christmas Party, according to Self.

He told JNS that the caucus has three primary goals. “We think our missions and our goals are to, one, alert our colleagues in Congress to the dangers of the explosion of Sharia across America today,” Self said.

“Next, get the American people to understand the danger and help them not be intimidated by the accommodation request and then the intimidation,” he added.

The caucus’s third objective, he said, is legislative action, Self told JNS, noting that “we have seven bills already that have been introduced on the floor of the House.”

Those bills include HR 5512, the No Sharia Act, which would restrict American courts from enforcing judgments or arbitration decisions based on Islamic law or other foreign legal systems that violate constitutional rights. Tuberville is sponsoring the companion bill, S 3008, in the Senate.

Another measure, HR 5722, the Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act, would bar foreign nationals who adhere to Sharia law from entering or remaining in the United States, with a Senate companion bill, S 3009, also introduced by Tuberville.

Additional legislation includes HR 6225, the Pausing All Admissions Until Security Ensured (PAUSE) Act, which would halt all immigration until reforms are implemented, and HR 5890, the No-Tax Exemptions for Terror Act, which would remove tax-exempt status from organizations with alleged ties to terrorist groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Self also introduced HR 6230, the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, which would designate as terrorists Iranian clerics who issued Sharia-based fatwas calling for the killing of U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

That bill has advanced further than the others. “It passed out of the Foreign Affairs Committee unanimously,” Self said, noting two abstentions.

The legislative package also includes HR 4387, the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025, HR 4097, which would designate CAIR as a terrorist organization, and HR 5890, which would eliminate the tax-exempt status for groups like CAIR “with close ties to terrorist organizations.”

Self said the caucus was formed in response to what he described as increasing attempts to introduce Sharia-based decisions into American civic life. “We have one set of laws in the United States, known as the U.S. Constitution, flowing down through the states to the local entities,” he said. “And those are the laws that govern us, not Sharia.”

On the state level, HB 1471 in Florida, filed by Rep. Hillary Cassel, a Republican, is scheduled for a Feb. 10 hearing. It declares that while religious freedom is protected, it does not extend to practices that violate public safety or individual rights, and singles out Sharia law as a “religious law” that may not be applied if it infringes on constitutional guarantees.

The legislation findings state that certain practices “inherent to Sharia law,” including child marriage, corporal punishment, discrimination against women and violence against non-Muslims, violate fundamental rights and public order, and cannot be enforced by Florida courts. Companion bill S 1632 was filed on Jan. 9 by the Senate Judiciary Committee and Sen. Erin Grall, a Republican.

In Arizona, SB 1573, introduced on Feb. 3 by Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Republican, is scheduled for a Feb. 11 hearing. The bill states that “religious sectarian law cannot be used by U.S. courts in decisions and court rulings.

HJR 10140 in Oklahoma, introduced on Feb. 2 by Reps. Gabe Woolley and David Bullard, both Republicans, bars courts from looking “to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law.”

In Kentucky, HB 539, introduced by Rep. Billy Wesley, a Republican, on Feb. 3, prohibits “the recognition of adjudicative rulings or contractual provisions based in whole or in part upon Sharia or any foreign law,” and New Hampshire’s HR 34, introduced Jan. 28 by Rep. Matt Sabourin, a Republican, prohibits government institutions from “deference to Sharia law.”

Self told JNS that while these bills are not part of the caucus’s movement, he is “delighted” to hear about them. “We’re going to need the states to be involved,” he said. “But even more than that, we’re going to have to have our citizens understand not to be intimidated.”

The caucus is organizing a meeting for later in February in Texas. “This is something that will not wait,” he said. “We’ve got to act now.”

Sharia Free America Caucus advances its slate of legislation (02/09/2026)
“We have one set of laws in the United States, known as the U.S. Constitution,” Congressman Keith Self, co-founder of the caucus, told JNS.
https://www.jns.org/u.s.-news/sharia-free-america-caucus-advances-its-slate-of-legislation
=====

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) is also a member Sharia Free America Caucus. He has proposed legislation to stop Chain Migration which accounts for the majority of immigration into the US on a annual basis. I am including it because it is not on the list of proposals in the article I just cited. But, if passed, it could reduce the number of annual immigrants from 700,000 - 1 million, down to a more manageable 70,000 per year. What better way to force American Muslims to assimilate.

=====
For nearly 60 years, U.S. immigration policy has been shaped by a law passed in 1965 that ended a national origins quota system and shifted the focus toward family reunification and skilled workers. Now, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said he wants to replace that system entirely. In an interview with News 2, Ogles described his proposal as a complete overhaul of how the United States determines who is allowed to enter and remain in the country. “This is a complete and total overhaul for immigration in the United States of America,” Ogles said. The proposal, known as “The Assimilation Act,” would repeal the current framework and replace it with what he describes as a system centered on skills and assimilation. Under his plan, immediate family members could still be eligible to immigrate, but more distant relatives would not. Applicants would be evaluated on their ability to contribute economically, including whether they have a job or a specific skill set. “At the end of the day, it is about what you are bringing to the community,” Ogles said. “Do you provide a skill? Can you get a job?” The plan would also eliminate programs such as the H-1B visa, which allows U.S. companies to hire foreign workers in specialized fields. “It also ends the H-1B visa scam. Companies are hiring foreign workers at $65,000 or $70,000 instead of paying Americans what they should be making,” he said. Ogles argues the current system places too much strain on public resources. He pointed to welfare usage among some immigrant groups as part of his reasoning for reform. “When you have 80 to 70 percent of Somalis in the country on welfare, that is a problem. When you have 50 to 60 percent of Afghanis here on welfare, that is a problem,” he said. The congressman has also faced criticism for recent comments about Muslims, including a statement that drew backlash from lawmakers and community members. “Think about what has happened over the last three weeks,” Ogles said. “We have had four terror attacks, all by Muslims.” Ogles, who represents a district with a growing and diverse population, said his proposal is intended to start a broader conversation about immigration policy in the United States. “There’s roughly 3,000 mosques in United States of America and as of this morning, not a single one of those mosques condemned the violence,” he said. Ogles has not yet released full legislative language, and any changes to federal immigration law would require approval from Congress. If enacted, the proposal would mark one of the most significant shifts in U.S. immigration policy in decades.

Tennessee congressman proposes overhaul of U.S. Immigration system (03/18/2026)
https://www.wkrn.com/news/tennessee-news/tennessee-congressman-proposes-overhaul-of-u-s-immigration-system/
=====

Here is Andy Ogles discussing the proposed legislation on the FOX Will Cain show. [I am not related to Will Cain by the way].

=====
Rep. Andy Ogles R-Tenn., introduces the ‘Assimilation Act’ to overhaul legal immigration, ending chain migration and implementing merit-based criteria on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

These individuals HATE America: Rep Andy Ogles (03/26/2026)

=====

In 1965 the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act was enacted under President Johnson. I discuss this in my first essay in the series: The Urgent Need for Global De-Islamification. This was the year that the floodgates for Muslim and African immigration was opened up and has led to huge increases in the number of Muslims and Africans migrating into the US for the last 60 years. The act exacerbated the flow of Muslim/African immigrants by also allowing chain migration: the ability to bring in distant cousins etc. The Assimilation Act of 2026 would reverse the annual flow of immigrants from about 700,000 per year to a more manageable 70,000 per year.

Here is a comprehensive Wiki article on Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

=====
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act and more recently as the 1965 Immigration Act, was a federal law passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson.[1] The law abolished the National Origins Formula, which had been the basis of U.S. immigration policy since the 1920s.[2] The act formally removed de facto discrimination against Southern and Eastern Europeans as well as Asians, in addition to other non-Western and Northern European ethnicities from the immigration policy of the United States. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a radical break from U.S. immigration policies of the past. Since Congress restricted naturalized citizenship to “white persons” in 1790, laws had restricted immigration from Asia and Africa, and gave preference to Northern and Western Europeans over Southern and Eastern Europeans.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
=====

=====
Every year, about one million new legal immigrants, or lawful permanent residents, are admitted to the United States. More than 10.6 million immigrants were admitted from 2007 through 2016. According to DHS statistics, in recent years about half of these immigrants have been what are sometimes called “initiating immigrants”, or the first in their family to settle permanently in the United States, perhaps after attending college, finding employment, as refugees from persecution, or receiving amnesty after illegal settlement. The other half are not path-breakers, but are joining family members who arrived earlier, in the phenomenon known as chain migration.

This report examines the scale of chain migration and recent trends of family sponsorship over time and across different groups of immigrants. In addition, we examine how an amnesty for beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program is likely to increase chain migration in the future, as DACA beneficiaries eventually qualify for citizenship and the opportunity to sponsor their parents and siblings, many of whom also have been residing in the United States illegally.

Immigration Multipliers: Trends in Chain Migration (Sept. 2017)
https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/vaughan-chain-migration_1.pdf
=====

And the following article spells out the problems created by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

=====
Each year, the United States approves more than a million permanent residency or green cards. For decades, more than half of immigration to our country has been chain migration — immigrants sponsored by a family member who came earlier, most often a new spouse, a grown son or daughter, or a sibling. In contrast, only about 15% of annual immigration is based on skills or sponsorship by an employer, with the remainder based on a green card lottery or humanitarian programs.

Chain migration and periodic amnesties that award huge numbers of green cards outside the regular system have fueled near-constant growth in legal immigration for decades. This is because two of the largest chain migration categories, spouses and parents of naturalized citizens, are not numerically capped. In particular, the number of parents admitted has grown by more than 15% since 2016, with more than 208,000 new green cards issued to parents of prior immigrants in 2023.

When most immigrants are chosen by family members who came earlier, there is no guarantee that immigration will help our country. As it turns out, our chain migration system is very expensive for taxpayers. Census data show that more than half of all immigrant-headed households are accessing at least one welfare program, compared to about 40% of native U.S.-born households, at a cost of $42 billion per year.

President Donald Trump’s recent statements have revealed his interest in reforming the legal immigration system to give greater priority to those who graduate from U.S. colleges and would purchase a $5 million “gold card” as a path to citizenship. In his first term, he backed legislation to reduce chain migration and eliminate the green card lottery in favor of a new points-based system that would greatly favor more highly educated immigrants who can speak English. Additionally, Trump has said he would like to have an amnesty for the 600,000 “Dreamers” who arrived illegally as children, have work authorization, and are protected from deportation.

Eliminating most chain migration in favor of an emphasis on a new skills-oriented program would greatly modernize our immigration system, deliver a flow of global talent for employers, and likely bring in immigrants from a greater range of countries who are more likely to be self-sufficient and less likely to depend on welfare programs. It would also reduce the multiplier effect of allowing extended family immigration.

In particular, Congress should abolish the visa lottery, end categories for non-nuclear family members, preserve categories for spouses and children, and cap the parents category at about 100,000 per year. Instead of admitting 200,000 extended family chain immigrants each year, we should have a new merit-based category of that size.

Thanks to the four-year border crisis that added more than 8 million migrants outside the legal system, Americans are experiencing serious migration fatigue. Replacing chain migration with a modern system balancing family admissions with more skilled immigrants will restore public support for our cherished tradition of generous immigration and better serve our national interest.

Chain migration fuels a bloated and obsolete immigration system
By Jessica M. Vaughan on May 8, 2025
https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/vaughan-chain-migration_1.pdf
=====

The Assimilation Act of 2026 is possibly the most important piece of legislation proposed by the Sharia Free America Caucus. If passed the flow of Muslim immigrants will virtually stop and will help nudge the American Muslim community to finally assimilate to American culture.

At the end of the day I’m just an old Perennial Hippie. I just want every human to enjoy their inalienable rights, to get along, to enjoy a dignified life, and to thrive. I spent 5 years of my life protesting and organizing against the Viet Nam War. I was against the invasion of Iraq, Libya etc. Sometimes you get to choose your wars. But sometimes wars choose you. And I think that is the case with Iran. How many decades do we listen to these nut bag Iranian Mullah’s chant “Death to America” before we take them at their word.

And I have also posted numerous videos -- from the US, Great Britain and other First World Nations -- with Muslims openly stating that Islam will Dominate or “Islam will enter every house.” It seems the mask has come off since 10/07/2023. Before that such admonitions were quite rare. Now they have become too common. Again, how much of this crap should we listen to before we take them at their word. The time to destroy Political Islam is upon us. Their ideology must be exposed. Their push for an Islamic Caliphate, under Sharia Law, must be defeated.