Reading · Whispers of Her Soul

Whispers of Her Soul is a reader-supported publication.
If you'd like to help write the essays still waiting to be written,
becoming a paid subscriber makes that possible.

Become a Paid Subscriber

Not everyone is going to like you.

You know that already.

At least intellectually.

A while ago, I found out someone had a completely wrong idea about me.

And it bothered me far more than I wanted it to.

What did I say? What did I do? What could possibly have made them see me that way?

For a while, I became obsessed with finding the point where I had apparently turned into this person in their mind. I wanted to explain. Correct. Clarify.

Then I caught myself.

I wasn’t trying to understand their opinion anymore.

I was trying to change it.

Trying to fix the version of me that existed inside another person’s head.

Most of us do this more than we admit.

We still behave as though there must be some version of ourselves that could prevent it. Kinder. Quieter. Funnier. Less opinionated. More agreeable. Better at explaining. Better at knowing when to shut up. Some perfectly calibrated personality nobody could misread, dislike, or walk away thinking badly of.

We spend years looking for that version.

She doesn’t exist.

And still, one strange reply or changed expression can send us searching for what we did wrong.

We don’t merely want to be liked. We want some control over the version of us living inside other people’s heads.

And no amount of goodness can guarantee how you will be understood.

The real question is how much of your life you are prepared to surrender trying.

We tend to assume that if people knew the whole story, they would eventually arrive at the same conclusion about us that we have.

They won’t.

Some people misunderstand you because they only saw a piece of the story and mistook it for the whole thing.

One wrong assumption, one moment without context, one conversation they were never there for can be enough to build an entirely different version of you.

If you explain, they might see you differently.

But there is another kind of misunderstanding.

The kind people choose because it gives them permission to dislike you.

Once they have decided who you are, every explanation becomes more material. Every correction becomes something else to twist. Every attempt to be understood keeps you standing in front of a jury that has already made up its mind.

You cannot correct a version of you that someone is committed to keeping.

And then there are people who simply do not like you.

Nobody is projecting anything. Nobody is threatened by your confidence or secretly disturbed by your boundaries. You can be kind, interesting, emotionally healthy and still annoy the hell out of somebody.

Think about how many perfectly decent people you have met and simply not liked very much.

They get to feel that way about you too.

Human chemistry is not a character reference.

Everybody who knows you knows a different person.

Your parents know one version. Your oldest friends know another. An ex may remember you through the worst year of your relationship. Someone who met you during a terrible month may sincerely believe that month was your personality.

Human beings meet each other in fragments.

You know everything that came before the day you finally lost your temper. They remember the day you lost your temper.

You know what you intended. They know what it felt like.

We live inside the complete archive of ourselves. Everybody else gets selected pages.

Sometimes being disliked is not the part that hurts most.

Being misread is worse.

There is something unbearable about knowing another person has reduced you to one moment, one mistake, one version of the story—and that you may never get to correct it.

You can leave the room and still spend years arguing your case inside it.

That is where freedom gets expensive.

You have to let people be wrong about you and keep living anyway.

But there is an uncomfortable correction to all of this.

The page they saw may contain something true.

There are criticisms we call misunderstandings because “misunderstood” hurts less than “they may have a point.”

So the question cannot always be, Why don’t they understand me?

Sometimes it has to become: Am I being misunderstood, or am I being seen in a way I don’t like?

Those are not the same thing.

Your boundary may anger somebody who preferred you without one. Your independence may unsettle a family accustomed to having a vote in your decisions.

But confidence can become arrogance. Honesty can become an excuse for unnecessary harshness. What we proudly call a boundary can occasionally be punishment with better vocabulary.

You are allowed to reject criticism.

You are not automatically entitled to diagnose it as projection.

If everyone who dislikes us is jealous, triggered, toxic, intimidated, narcissistic, wounded, or incapable of handling our truth, therapy language has simply given the ego better lawyers.

The courage to be disliked should never become the cowardice to be corrected.

There is a reason disapproval can feel much bigger than the event itself.

For some of us, being liked was never merely pleasant. It kept things calm.

You learned early which version of yourself created the least friction. When to speak. When to apologize. When to become smaller for a while.

Then adulthood arrives and some of those calculations remain.

A friend is disappointed and your stomach drops. You say NO and spend half the afternoon wondering whether you should go back and say yes.

Approval once meant belonging. Disapproval meant something might happen.

Now another adult being annoyed with you is usually not an emergency. They are unhappy. You are uncomfortable. Life continues.

And yet we build entire decisions around avoiding that discomfort. We stay longer, agree faster, explain more, keep relationships alive because leaving would make us “the bad one.”

You can build an entire life around making sure nobody is terribly disappointed in you and still end up deeply disappointed in your own life.

And approval is not democratic.

There are three or four people whose disappointment can still reduce us to twelve years old.

That is often where the real work is: surviving the disappointment of the one person you spent half your life trying not to disappoint.

People-pleasing can look like kindness from the outside, but often it begins with fear.

Fear of conflict. Fear of rejection. Fear that one honest NO will change the relationship.

If I become useful enough, agreeable enough, forgiving enough, perhaps you will continue liking me. Perhaps you will not leave.

And somewhere inside that fear, there can also be an attempt at control: I will become what keeps you comfortable, and in return I hope you will continue approving of me.

Except nobody signed that contract.

You can sacrifice enormous pieces of yourself for another person’s happiness and still discover that they reserve the right to dislike you.

And they do.

We talk endlessly about wanting the freedom to be ourselves while quietly denying everybody else the freedom to dislike who that is.

If your interior life belongs to you, theirs has to belong to them too.

They are allowed to think you are difficult. To disagree with your choices. To understand you perfectly and still decide they do not particularly like you.

Two human beings failed to produce mutual admiration.

It happens.

Sometimes we do not actually need everybody to like us.

We need everybody to agree that we were the good one.

That is a different addiction.

There is comfort in believing every conflict has a clean moral conclusion. Somebody was reasonable. Somebody was unfair. Somebody tried. Somebody ruined it. And naturally, we would prefer to leave the story standing on the right side of that line.

So we want the breakup where everybody agrees we tried everything, the family argument where everyone admits we were pushed too far. We want to leave every conflict with our moral record intact.

Being disliked is one thing. Being considered wrong is much harder.

But relationships rarely leave behind such convenient verdicts. Sometimes you were hurt and still handled it badly. Sometimes somebody treated you unfairly and you eventually became unfair in return. Sometimes you made the best decision you could and another person was genuinely wounded by it.

You can have reasons without being completely right.

You can regret what you did without deciding everything was your fault.

And you can change without requiring the person who knew the old version of you to update their opinion.

Changing does not retroactively edit somebody else’s experience.

Then there are the relationships that change when you do.

People get used to versions of us.

The friend who always answers. The daughter who never argues. The colleague who takes on the extra work. The partner who says, “It’s fine,” when it absolutely is not.

Then something changes.

You stop volunteering. You say NO. You disagree without immediately softening it.

And suddenly: “You’ve changed.”

Of course you have.

Sometimes “you’ve changed” really means, “you were easier for me before.”

There is another trap here too.

Sometimes the hardest version of yourself to leave behind is the one everybody else liked.

You become known as the strong one, so asking for help feels embarrassing. The easygoing one, so anger feels like a character flaw. The generous one, so saying NO feels selfish.

Compliments can become jobs.

Some relationships do get thinner when you stop managing them. The calls are shorter. The invitations come less often. A few people seem less warm once you are no longer the one smoothing everything over.

Freedom does not always feel powerful.

Sometimes it means accepting that the relationship changed when you stopped carrying so much of it.

There is also a counterfeit version of this freedom.

“I don’t care what anybody thinks.”

“I just tell it like it is.”

“People can’t handle me.”

Usually said, interestingly enough, to other people.

Some of us stop chasing applause and start chasing outrage instead. The reaction changed. The need did not.

Someone genuinely comfortable with being disliked does not need enemies as proof of authenticity. They can hear something uncomfortable, admit when they are wrong, and ignore what deserves ignoring.

“Stop caring what people think” is terrible advice. The better question is: whose judgment has earned a vote?

This is where self-trust matters.

Approval-seeking does more than make us anxious. It interferes with our ability to know what we think.

When every choice is checked against everybody else’s reaction, disapproval starts feeling like evidence that the choice itself was wrong.

Someone is upset with me, therefore I must have behaved badly.

Eventually other people become the measuring equipment for your own life.

The opposite of approval-seeking is not confidence. It is self-trust.

Self-trust does not require certainty. You can question how you handled something without handing somebody else the final say over whether your decision was right.

Their disappointment stops becoming an instruction.

It becomes information.

That matters most when doing the right thing costs you approval.

The hardest people to disappoint are not always the ones who treated us badly.

Sometimes they love us deeply.

Your parent may believe you are throwing away the life they hoped you would choose. Your partner may hear your NO as rejection when, to you, it is the first honest answer you have given in months. Your best friend may feel abandoned by a decision you made because you simply could not keep showing up in the same way.

That is harder to live with because their hurt may be real.

You cannot dismiss it as manipulation.

And you still may need to make the choice they wish you wouldn’t.

If doing what you believed was right required somebody you loved to think badly of you, could you still do it?

That is not a question about popularity.

It is a question about integrity.

There is a strange relationship between dislike and intimacy.

We assume being liked creates closeness.

But needing to be liked constantly can make closeness impossible.

If I cannot risk disappointing you, I cannot tell you everything. I will hide the opinion that might upset you, avoid the conversation that might change how you see me, say yes when I mean NO.

Eventually you may love me very much.

You just may not know me very well.

You cannot be fully known while making likability a condition of the relationship.

Being willing to be disliked can actually make you easier to love, because now there is finally somebody there to love.

Not the agreeable version assembled from everybody else’s preferences.

Real intimacy needs that risk: the possibility that I may show you something you do not particularly like and trust that the relationship can survive your reaction.

Sometimes the freedom to be disliked is also the freedom to finally become knowable.

Eventually you reach the boundary of your responsibility.

You listened. You looked honestly at yourself. You apologized where an apology was owed. You repaired what was yours. You explained what needed explaining.

Perhaps you changed.

And they still do not like you.

Now what?

Nothing.

You let them.

Not dramatically. Not by deciding they must be jealous, wounded, threatened, or incapable of understanding your depth.

You simply stop applying for a position in their mind that is not available.

And something changes when you do.

You get your attention back.

You stop conducting autopsies on ordinary conversations and writing defenses for accusations nobody has made. You can say NO without composing a legal brief afterward.

You start making choices based more on what you can live with than on who might be disappointed.

You will still flinch sometimes.

A cold reply from someone you respect can still ruin an afternoon.

The difference is that the flinch no longer automatically becomes a project. You notice it, feel it, and eventually return to your own life instead of moving into theirs.

Freedom was never going to mean becoming emotionally bulletproof.

It means their opinion can hurt without becoming an instruction.

Some criticism should change you. Some deserves a conversation. Some requires an apology.

You cannot demand the freedom to be yourself while denying everybody else the freedom to respond honestly to who that is.

You get your life.

They get their opinion.

A few of those opinions will be unfair. Others will be embarrassingly accurate. The hardest ones may come from people you desperately wanted to understand you.

And yes, they may still bother you.

That was never the problem.

The problem was believing you had to fix every opinion before you were allowed to keep living.

At some point, you have to stop asking other people to hand your life back to you.

Become a Paid Subscriber

Share Whispers of Her Soul

Every Paid Subscriber brings me one step closer to the independent life I am
building for me and my son.
And if you’re here simply to read, I’ll never take your time for granted.

And if these essays mean something to you I would be honored to have you with us.

It matters more than you might realize.