The Hunt for a "Singular Matrix" Error Message is a Telltale Sign of the Induction of Counter-Space

I learned, today, how important it is to prevent “matrix is singular” error messages and its equivalency of “timestep is too small in transient analysis” by going even further than I normally do to prevent these messages from freezing up the simulator. This hurdle is crucial to my circuit development since this “frozen condition of the simulator” denies me the possibility of testing what may be a good idea for a circuit simulation.

This occurs because simulators depend upon taking shortcuts of all sorts to perform their calculations during runtime. This is merely one type of their shortcut strategies which impacts reactance parameters. It does not affect non-reactive parameters, such as: resistance.

My circuit topologies tend to be laid out with the idea in mind of one portion being a reflection of another portion, namely: a mirror image; a left-hand subcircuit of a right-hand subcircuit. The simulator does not give itself any other option other than the use of matrix algebra, during runtime, and (thus) screws up its ability to make sense out of what is going on and, hence, halts its operation instead of providing me with a nice, smooth performance.

I’m not sabotaging myself on purpose. It’s just the nature of the beast to live in a world of software engineers who thoroughly believe that “overunity” is not possible and that we must provide all of the “accountable” energy sources so as to be billed for the total energy usage as a commercial constraint. Software engineers are no different than electrical engineers, mechanical engineers or physicists in this regard.

Yet, I know I can delude the simulator into believing that “overunity” has occurred when, in fact, it has not. Instead, energy has been reused (recycled) at an ever-escalating rate due to my propitious use of capacitance, inductance, resistance and a low-voltage input. Under these conditions, energy has also (most likely) come from sources which no one would presume the possibility, such as (but not limited to): surge arresters, ground rods or zero-voltage batteries, and coils. The latter example rewrites the Law of Inductance penned by Michael Faraday. But, hey; nobody’s perfect!

So, on the basis of these presumptions of conventional thought, software engineers design electronic simulators using whatever “tricks” or “work-around solutions” they can get away with whenever performing the complicated process of runtime calculations — all of which are strains made upon the computer’s central processing unit (CPU).

If I’m the only one complaining, then it must be due to myself being the only person on the planet who takes the simulation of free energy circuits seriously enough to continuously bump into this shortcoming of the limited availability of software options.

Commerce should not dictate our designs except for superficial reasons whenever we are appealing to the public’s visceral sensibilities of aesthetics regarding the product’s appearance. But that can easily be addressed by the project box within which the circuit will be surrounded. And this accommodation should not encompass “tunnel vision” physics in which a mere portion of physics is taken into consideration (the portion that is commercially viable) and render everything else (within the realm of physics) to be controversial and theoretical — and, certainly, not prohibited from everyday engineering — for that would short-change all of us from enjoying a better quality of life (lost profits, therefrom, be damned).

So, without further ado, this is what I discovered today: that it is not enough to peer into caps and coils and create a miniscule deviation for the capacitances and the inductances of each and every capacitor and inductor so as to create a “reactive signature” which is unique to each of these reactive elements within a circuit and prevent the formation of a “singular matrix” who's mirrored (mathematical) reflection is equal to itself.

It is also necessary to peer into diodes since the model for their behavior may contain a type of capacitance called: “CJO = zero-bias depletion capacitance” as measured in units of Farads same as any other capacitor is parametered in terms of. This needs its own signature unique from every other diode’s similar parameter to prevent freezing up the simulation.

So, I convert this parameter of, let’s say: “20p” (Farads) into “{20p+12345e-25}” — a five-digit string of five randomly chosen integers whose base integer (rightmost) is tied to a very low place-value. In this case, the base integer is: 1e-25 since the signature must be positioned sufficiently enough to the right of the capacitor’s value so as to become a minor component of its value and an insignificant contribution of magnitude. Since the simulator is limited to 15 significant digits within its double-precision style of accounting, I choose a shift of signficant value to the right which is no more than 15 digits in addition to the 12 digits which “1p” is already shifted (one pico Farad = 12 digits of right-shift; 11 digits for 20 pF). So, I chose 14 digits (place values) shifted to the right of “20p” (2e-11) which is:

This solved my “matrix is singular” error messages and gave me an open door to free energy simulation.

Of course, “free energy” does not exist except as an energy source lacking accountability since energy is never for “free” whenever it comes time to “pay the bill”. Someone always has to pay. Just, let it not be me except for a tiny quantity serving as a catalyst to “harvest energy” from anywhere else other than manmade sources. Hopefully, this “harvesting of energy” won’t be from manmade sources since that would be “theft”.

But if the electric utility company is harvesting its energy from the same natural source/s as I am, then that makes us competitors in which neither of us are thieves.

And if our “free energy” circuit/device gets some, or most, of its energy from the aetheric property of counter-space, then it’s not getting it from somewhere else. It’s getting it from a modification of waveform which defies thermodynamic entropy making it mandatory to recycle energy and react off of reactance becoming a self-supporting, self-magnifying feedback of positive interference.

This latter condition is unheard of (generally speaking). So, it’s not surprising that most engineers would find this idea to be incredulous since they assume that they were taught everything about electricity and there isn’t anything else which is unknown about it.

If only they had peered into the controversy surrounding theoretical physics, this wouldn’t be such a mystery nor a surprise.

Oh, well!