How Pharma Turns Clinical Trials Into Propaganda

“A pharmaceutical company telling you its result was clinically meaningful, without showing you the result, is an advertisement.”

It never amazes me how powerful pharma and the media are.

One minute, they’ll have the population hate one thing — the next, the population will cheer something else. What makes this even more powerful is when the thing they hate and the thing they cheer for are the same.

Just last week, all that was covered was Anthony Fauci. One of the most damming news stories that occurred was that there was an association between mRNA and first-trimester miscarriages.

This is the same mRNA technology that killed children, as reported by The Atlantic, and is the quiet elephant in the room as to why many people are either dropping dead or have cancer.

However, just by the stroke of a magical wand, the pharma-controlled media can drop a news story and make everyone fall in love with the same technology that resulted in deaths.

Just two days ago, news broke about how mRNA technology is treating cancer — poof — and just like that — everyone forgot how dangerous mRNA is.

It’s very mind-blowing, but it serves as an excellent case study on media manipulation. However, not just media manipulation, but statistics. This is key.

I’ve written a plethora of articles on statistics because statistics serves a major purpose: adding numbers to control the narrative. Statistics can be a powerful tool when wielded intentionally, and an unsuspecting population is none the more vulnerable.

It’s for this reason that I recommend one read all my articles on stats to get brought up to speed:

• Weaponized Logic — How ‘Correlation vs. Causation’ is Used to Dismiss inconvenient Truths

• How To Argue With Friends and Family That Vaccines Do Cause Autism

• Statistical Deception: The Great Travesty upon the Tapestry of Human History

• A 1954 Book Explains How They Lie to You in 2026

The following article breaks down this clinical trial. I’ll call out some key points and ultimately how this is a perfect example of the following flaws of scientism.

• Why the “cancer vaccine” everyone’s celebrating is neither a vaccine nor a cure—and how the media pulled off the reversal

• The critical difference between a treatment and a cure, and why that distinction is being deliberately blurred

• How small sample sizes and 2:1 trial designs inflate percentages to sound more impressive than they are

• Why clinical trial data itself functions as advertisement

• The deeper problem: why we don’t actually understand cancer in the first place

The only news anyone can take from this is that Merck — the same people who created ivermectin — along with Gates Moderna, had a vaccine that passed Phase 3 trials.

That’s it.

I’m hearing that Trump is giving Gates money to fund Gavi, so, so much for that savior.

Here’s the crazy part: the vast majority of people are misunderstanding the results. But they’re not only misunderstanding the results; they’re propagating it as something it’s not — a cure.