In recent weeks, The New Digest has, by coincidence, featured a number of powerful critiques of so-called “natural law originalism” — roughly, the view that tries to justify originalism by grounding it in the natural law. Mr. Harsh Shah has written a thorough critique in two parts, and our own Professor Jeremy Christiansen has posted an important recent draft. We thought it would be a service to our readers to collect all of these in one place, in the aforementioned order.
Enjoy!
Pseudo-Classical: On “Natural Law Originalism” (Part I)
·
Jul 8
The New Digest is delighted to present a guest essay in two parts by Mr. Harsh C. Shah, who holds an LL.B. and LL.M. from Cardiff University (UK) and is an incoming LL.M. student at UW-Madison (US). Part I is presented here; Part II will follow shortly.
Pseudo-Classical: On “Natural Law Originalism” (Part II)
·
Jul 17
The New Digest is delighted to present Part II of a guest essay on “natural law originalism” by Mr. Harsh C. Shah, who holds an LL.B. and LL.M. from Cardiff University (UK) and is an incoming LL.M. student at UW-Madison (US). Part I may be found here
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.