
August Break
As is our tradition, we will put The New Digest on hiatus for the last two weeks of August, rejoining you at the beginning of September — refreshed, tanned, and ready.
A forum for short essays on law, politics, political theology, postliberalism, and the common good. We offer reflections on the classical legal tradition and ius commune, and how their precepts and ideas can be adapted and translated.
Live Last read · last published · next check

As is our tradition, we will put The New Digest on hiatus for the last two weeks of August, rejoining you at the beginning of September — refreshed, tanned, and ready.

Interpreting the Mexican Constitution for the Common Good

The New Digest is delighted to offer a guest essay by Professor Arturo Salazar Santander.

In recent weeks, The New Digest has, by coincidence, featured a number of powerful critiques of so-called “natural law originalism” — roughly, the view that tries to justify originalism by grounding it in the natural law.

A Selected Bibliography

I was fortunate enough to be invited to speak in Washington, D.C.

On July 20, 2026, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Jouppi v.

We thought we would draw the attention of our readers to an excellent concurrence by Judge Paul Matey, joined by Judge Jenn Mascott, in a recent en banc proceeding before the Third Circuit.

A few times, including here at the New Digest, I’ve touched on the recent argument by “natural law originalists” that natural law requires judges to recuse in the face of an unjust law.

The New Digest is delighted to present a guest essay by Aníbal Sabater, a regular contributor to our pages and a leading commentator on classical legal themes.