
The curiosity versus direct debate is the wrong argument.
For the last couple of years our profession has been split into two camps.
Built in 40+ countries. Top rank year one. Launched and merged companies. I don't sell hype. I fix what's broken in your team or company. Most teams stall because leadership stopped getting built. Not because people quit.
Live Last read · last published · next check

For the last couple of years our profession has been split into two camps.

Brené Brown’s seven-year study on brave leadership found that more than half of leaders avoid hard conversations under the cover of being “nice and polite.” The team pays for it.

Daniel Pink's Drive laid out exactly how dangling carrots backfire. Comp plans and real recognition aren't the problem. The endless short-term contests bolted on top are.

Companies acquired through leveraged buyouts go bankrupt at 10 times the rate of comparable companies. The leverage was the only variable. Your business follows the same rule.

Self-employed earners experience nearly 200% higher income volatility than traditional employees. This profession trains leaders to ignore that. The collapse that follows is predictable, and almost no

Most leaders in this profession have the order backwards. They try to personalize before they have a system that works for anyone. The team collapses inside ninety days, and the leader blames the team

There’s a body of research most distributors will never read that explains more about their success or failure than any training they’ve ever consumed.

Deals. Bridges. BDAs. Leaders who agree on everything else go to war over this one. The reason: almost every argument about it is happening between two people who are looking at completely different s

I spent two years studying 53 direct selling companies that boomed and then fell apart.

There’s a business book called The 4 Disciplines of Execution by Chris McChesney, Sean Covey, and Jim Huling.