Feminism is an ideology that argues for dismantling patriarchy, seeing it as an unjust hierarchy. Our society is very deeply patriarchal, and this dismantling will drastically impact many aspects of our lives, especially as intersectionality linked patriarchy to other related hierarchies. In fact, there have been intersectionalist critiques of some historic feminist movements, that levy that rather than true liberation, those movements have merely sought to transform the nature of (some) women’s oppression.
Abolishing the family unit
Feminism has already made progress on dismantling the idea that the woman in a family unit is the one who must take care of both the home and children, unpaid. "Stay at home dads" are more common and some countries even pay "stay at home" parents a salary for their efforts.
However, the nuclear family persists. It emphasizes individualism rather than community, and supports the generational transition of power (or lack thereof). The nuclear family therefore must, at some point, be abolished entirely. Children should instead be liberated and seen as autonomous members of the community itself, rather than the responsibility of (and submissive to) a discrete number of parents. For more details on adult supremacy and parenting, see Parenting.
For what it's worth, abolishing the family is a topic that has been discussed throughout history, as far back as Plato. Plato, in Republic, described a world where children and their parents may not know each other, which would abolish the family unit, albeit in a form much different than I advocate for here. Marx also called for abolishing the family, seeing it as something else that would wither away as society progressed towards communism. Then modern feminists also made this claim, such as Firestone's The Dialectic of Sex.
Abolishing the couple-form
Most of my understanding of this feminist argument comes from the document Against the Couple-Form, and atm I'd really just recommend you read that, rather than a man's rough summary of it.
Abolishing gender
Ultimately, patriarchy won't be fully abolished until gender as a concept is destroyed. We have placed a very wide spectrum of how people look, talk, act, the things they do, the things they like, and so on into two arbitrary buckets. It is absurd and oppressive, and ultimately gender must either be considered non-existent or something as wholly unique to the individual that there's no point trying to create neat little categories for it.
Intersectionalism
There's another hierarchy that really reinforces patriarchy, and must be entirely abolished if patriarchy is to be abolished as well: Capitalism. The couple form is reinforced by rent being too high for single salaries, we fight for marriage rights because the capitalist state holds tax incentives and other benefits to married couples, issues like the gender pay gap and paid family leave are only relevant because of our constant coercion to work just to justify our right to continue living. To truly abolish patriarchy, capitalism must go with it.
To put the above another way: paving the way for (white) women to be a more significant presence in the workforce did not destroy the role they played in the patriarchal society (being a mother), but rather just made them have to do both.
One way this principle may manifest is in the fight for equal pay for equal work. Our individualist approach to raises enables systemic sexism and racism. Besides the biases of management themselves, this approach prioritizes assertiveness and de-prioritizes anyone who needs to take temporary leave (e.g. for parental leave). Having everyone in the same position getting the same pay prevents those forms of discrimination and allows those in said position to bargain as a group. This is an important fight opposing patriarchy and white supremacy, but it doesn't challenge our capitalist framework. It mustn't slow down the fight to truly liberate everyone that can only come from abolishing capitalism.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.