The team has been in early contact with Jason through the Securus communication system — the platform used for correspondence with incarcerated individuals in Texas — and has also met with his father, Larry, who appeared in LSJA video content and has been part of introducing Jason to the campaign and what it might mean for him.
This is real work. Getting to know someone through a system designed for monitoring, not intimacy, takes time and patience. Calls cut out. Audio is difficult. The relationship has to be built carefully, especially with someone who has spent years largely removed from the information environment that the rest of us navigate daily. The team approaches this with the trauma-informed framework that is foundational to everything the campaign does.
What has come through already, even in early conversations: Jason is a person with a great deal to offer. His relationships inside — including a mentorship role he has taken on — and his relationship with his father are both threads the story will follow. The angles are still developing. The interview is still being shaped. The full portrait is not yet ready.
That honesty is part of the campaign’s ethos. Incomplete Sentences does not rush toward a publishable narrative. It waits for the person to be ready, for the language to be right, for the story to arrive in a form that serves the person it belongs to.
Jason’s story will come when it is ready. In the meantime, his presence in the campaign’s second quarter is itself part of the record the initiative is building.
Why narrative is the infrastructure
One of the quieter arguments running through Incomplete Sentences is about what storytelling is for in an information environment that increasingly rewards compression.
Social platforms optimize for brevity. Search algorithms surface early documents — the first record, not the most complete one. AI-generated summaries reduce source material to a few sentences before a human reader ever arrives. In that environment, the short version of a person is not supplemented by the long version. It is the version. It does the work of the whole.
The campaign’s response is structural: produce multiple formats around each voice, so that wherever a reader encounters the campaign first — an Instagram post, a Substack essay, a syndicated article, the educational hub — the picture they receive is closer to complete. The story has to be built to survive the compression, or it won’t.
This is communications work in the most literal sense. And it is also, quietly, a meditation on what attention is worth and what we lose as a society when we stop making room for it.
What the year looks like
Through the end of 2026, Incomplete Sentences will release two more story profiles alongside Jason’s, one per quarter. Q3 is already in early development. Between releases, this Substack will publish longer essays — on the educational content, on the mechanics of the storytelling process, on the people and ideas the campaign is encountering as it moves through the year.
The goal is cumulative. Each story, each essay, each poem adds to a record that is fuller than what came before it. By the end of the year, there will be four voices where there were none — four full pictures where the public record held only fragments.
That is the campaign’s definition of success, and it is the most honest one available: more of the story in the world than was there before.
Incomplete Sentences is a year-long initiative by the Millbrook Companies and the Lone Star Justice Alliance. The full archive — including Lici’s story and the campaign’s educational hub — lives at incompletesentences.org. New essays and stories will continue through 2026. Follow along and support LSJA’s work through the campaign site.
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.