In 2017, after a decade in brand marketing and an MBA, Neha Ruch had what looked from the outside like the goal: a head-of-brand role at the wedding-tech company Zola. Then she made the move people kept mistaking for a retreat.
After her son was born, she downshifted to a two-day-a-week version of the job, then kept stepping back. The annual review that had charted her progress for a decade went with it, along with the title that had signaled to everyone, herself included, that she was winning. The traditional systems that define success and hand out power were no longer there to do it for her. So she defined success herself, starting with three measures for the year that had nothing to do with salary or title: network, impact, and learning.
What she built in the years that followed became Mother Untitled, now Power Pause, a platform reframing the career downshift for ambitious women, and a book of the same name, The Power Pause, a USA Today bestseller. People who see the book and the morning-show segments tend to read it as an overnight success. And yet, the work brought in no money and little outside validation for the better part of a decade.
The thread running through all of it is how Ruch defines success and power once the usual structures stop doing it for her. Most careers run on borrowed definitions, where a title sets your worth and a review sets your goals. Ruch wrote her own, and drew her power from the platform and audience she built. It is the move this series is built around: from positional power, the kind a title confers, to structural power, the kind you set yourself.
More workers are being pushed to define it for themselves now. Women started 49% of new businesses in 2024, up from 29% in 2019, according to Gusto’s 2025 New Business Formation Report, many of them choosing the autonomy and flexibility a traditional job rarely offers. The traditional job, for its part, has grown shakier: white-collar payrolls have contracted for 31 straight months, the longest such stretch outside a recession in decades, former Glassdoor chief economist Aaron Terrazas told Quartz.
Ruch has been doing it since 2017. A few of the most useful lessons from our conversation:
Leaving a full-time role meant leaving the machinery that had defined success for Ruch: the annual review, the promotion track, the title that signaled her standing. With nothing assigning her goals, the question of whether she was moving forward had no built-in answer. So she built one. She chose three measures for the year that had nothing to do with salary or title, network, impact, and learning, and wrote out in detail what an ideal day five years out looked like, then reverse-engineered measurable goals from it.
“Goals dignify our time. Goals help us feel like, I’m moving from point A to point B. And it’s very common where you hear women as soon as they part from the traditional workforce saying, I feel stuck. And that stuckness comes from no one’s telling me if I’m moving forward.”
Inside a company, success is defined for you; promotion criteria, review cycles, and titles tell you where you stand and how much you matter. Few people ever define it for themselves. As AI redraws which roles and tasks count, the people who can say what success and standing look like on their own terms hold something the org chart can no longer hand them. Ruch’s network-impact-learning system is a definition of success she set herself, and a source of standing no employer controls.
When the conversation turned to flexibility and how it plays out for women in leadership, Ruch pointed to Emma Grede, whose 2026 book Start With Yourself argues bluntly that proximity and office time are what earn the promotion and the corner office. Ruch didn’t treat that as a rebuttal of her own work. She treats flexibility as personal: the woman whose definition of success is running four companies builds her days nothing like the woman Ruch met who practices radiology at half-time so she can be home for the other half. What both women share is a trade they made on purpose.
“I like to think of them as choices. There are choices at every point. And the best thing we can do as women is be honest about the choices and trade-offs so that we can put more empowered, informed options on the table.”
Flexibility gets argued as though it has one correct setting, which is why every season brings a fresh round of the work-from-home wars. Both Grede’s case and Ruch’s hold once you drop the premise of a single definition of success: the woman optimizing for four companies gives up time at home, and the one optimizing for time at home gives up the fastest route to the title. Grede proves it from the top, having chosen not to take the CEO seat at Skims even as she tells women to get in the office. What Ruch insists on is that the trade be named out loud and chosen on purpose.
When the conversation turned to risk and AI, Ruch pointed to the emotional separation people are starting to make from employers they once treated as family, and to the women now building companies and hiring other women into flexible leadership roles. She offered one concrete example: a woman who negotiated a two-day workweek at JP Morgan by borrowing the language from a friend of a friend who had done it at HSBC.
“That company that I’ve given 15 years to is actually not my family. They are not my family. They’re not, their best interest is not my health and longevity here. And that’s a very healthy emotional separation.”
The portfolio that once read as instability now reads more like a hedge, because the traditional job it was measured against has itself grown less stable. Concentrating your income and your identity in one employer concentrates your exposure the moment that employer’s interests and yours diverge. And the shift compounds. One woman’s negotiated two-day week becomes the template the next one carries into her own boss’s office.
When I asked Ruch what term of her old full-time role she would never accept again, her answer was that her title is all she is. The leverage point she rebuilt is evaluation. In the full-time role, the company set the goals and, with them, the sense of what she was worth; her standing rose and fell with what she could say she ran. The version she built measures her by her own yardstick: network, impact, learning, and a sense of self that survives any title.
“That my title is all that I am... it has become a superpower to know I’m bigger than that.”
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.