What if Token Anxiety is actually a promotion?

It’s 5am in Medellín.

Jordan is asleep. Youssef is too. The air is thick, but my screen is brighter.

On my monitor, seven instances of Claude Code are firing in unison. It’s a “Max 20x” orchestration. It feels less like software development and more like conducting a digital philharmonic.

But beneath the productivity, there’s a leak in my brain. A persistent, nagging dread.

VC Nikunj Kothari calls it Token Anxiety. It’s the guilt of the idle engine. If the silicon workforce isn’t spinning tokens 24/7, you feel like you’re squandering an asymmetric advantage.

The machine doesn’t sleep. Why should I?

For a decade, my identity was rooted in the labor of construction.

We found value in the “productive struggle.” We forged expertise through the agonizing friction of syntax, boilerplate, and manual debugging.

Today, that struggle has collapsed.

If a $200 subscription mirrors the output of a $200,000 engineer, your old skills feel cheap. To the traditional builder, AI doesn’t feel like a tool. It feels like a replacement for the “deep work” that gave life meaning.

We fear we’ve traded craftsmanship for a feedback loop of correcting hallucinations.

The Primeagen quoted this better than anyone:

This resentment is a rational response to a shift we didn’t ask for. We aren’t witnessing the death of craft; we are receiving a mandatory promotion.

We are moving from the age of Builders to the age of Sculptors.

In the old paradigm, value was simple:

Value=(Skills×Hours)

Today, when output is a commodity and anyone can generate a thousand tokens in seconds, the equation has shifted:

Value=(Taste×Agency)

Taste is the only thing the machine can simulate but never inhabit. It is the human “weight-in” that recognizes when a solution actually resonates with another human.

Leave a comment

As the sun rises over the mountains, I hit my rate limits.

The anxiety hasn’t vanished, but it has evolved. It’s no longer the dread of obsolescence; it’s the friction of a class migration. We are being forced to act as managers of digital capital rather than providers of digital labor.

Token Anxiety only feels like a disease if you are still trying to be a better bricklayer than the machine. But for the Sculptor, that anxiety is a competitive edge. The most productive act for a modern developer is no longer to produce more—it is to have the guts to shape reality with the output one can generate with AI.

In 2026, we are finally moving past the syntax to master the outcome. We don’t just write; we decide. And that decision is the only thing that cannot be commoditized.

— Thiago Ricieri

X.com @thiagobuilds
Instagram @thgvr or @thiagobuilds
Threads @thgvr or @thiagobuilds
LinkedIn @thiagoricieri
Substack Making of a Maker written by @thgvr

Does this transition from “Builder” to “Sculptor” capture the shift in your own experience, or does it still feel like we’re just managing the “ignorance debt” of the AI?