It is often assumed that the 25th Amendment requires cooperation of presidential cabinet members to determine whether a president is unfit and should be removed.
This is false. In the event a president is mentally or physically incapable of fulfilling his duties, the 25th Amendment provides two options. The first option provides that “a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments,” i.e., cabinet secretaries, determine whether the president is incapable of governing. The second option does the same by “such other body as Congress may by law provide[.]” (Amendment XXV, Section 4)
Thus, Congress is permitted to bypass the cabinet and take the first step toward removing a dangerously unfit president.
After the congressionally-appointed body finds him unfit, Congress and the vice president are required to give the House Speaker and Senate President “their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office[.]” (Ibid.)
Since the 25th Amendment has never been acted upon, the vice president’s role is not entirely settled. Questions remain. Is the vice president required to stand by the findings of Congress and its appointed body? Or is he allowed to veto Congress, and thereby hold extreme power over the process?
When such uncertainties arise, the wise thing to do is err on the side of preserving our republic.
allows Congress to make that decision.
“or of such other body as Congress may by law provide”

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.