Rational anticipation

What followed my quick reading of WSJ articles about Federal Reserve meeting of this afternoon was to go onto a conversation with Google AI mode. I’ve been interested in the Fed’s move on interest rate decision as much as many other people are in. Chairman Kevin Warsh is new as everyone knows, also having impressed President Trump who described Warsh as young (youthful looking) and energetic.

Is Warsh though in a one man’s fight? No, rather “single strategy “ is the words introduced by Nick Timiraos at The Wall Street Journal.

**

This is the cover image of my publication of today. Familiar? A tentative title of the day is “Hi to the world by a metal angel”, let me say.

**

Below is the info about today’s meeting on interest rate . For this one, I got also from a google search, it’s an answer simple and straight.

The image within my screenshot captures Kevin Warsh in case there is anyone who doesn’t know him.

Here is another info piece regarding the members of Task Force consisting of five sectors. The screenshot I made is also from Google search.

**

My inquiries to GAIM are intuitive as such is true for my writing of any sort. A member of Five Task Forces drew my attention. My interest in him arose from an association level for NYU and Nobel laureate. The association in question in my mind was Paul Krugman. Immediately I raised a question to GAIM and sequential exchanges turned out to be related to an issue on Fed Reserve meeting, according to me. Read the following screenshots from our conversation. I switched the language to French but the content isn’t so much of showcase of French linguistic expositions.

I was wrong to have been thinking Krugman thought in NYU as a regular prof. But, the difference between them on their mathematical models? That further interested me, indeed!

Thus I asked.

Well, I didn’t pursue the elaboration to past economic crisis as model cases to be actual. Instead I pondered upon. When the State sets policies of whatever in view of consequential effects to be aimed at, such could be interpreted as similar to economic manipulations in authoritarian governance surged from socialism.

Rather, people should be allowed and encouraged to make assessments of their own because such is the essence of free democratic regime. There are two differences. Information as guidance, OR, directional influences for specifically political purposes of particular socio-political movement.

To make self-justification, I assert here the fact that I’m not an attack force against Paul Krugman. My thought ran on my conversation with GAIM as a development in liberty. In short, my opinion has been expressed.

**

Let me finish this publication with WSJ excerpts from Nick Timiraos’s articles. No one needs to be a genius to grasp my view at large.

*

(Excerpt from “Kevin Warsh Wanted a ‘Good Family Fight’ at the Fed. He’s Getting One” by Nick Timiraos (WSJ; 7/27). )

*

The cited person is William English, a former director of the Fed’s monetary division.

Whether the rhetoric will ever be matched by action? That is what Timiraos raised there in his piece as a core question.

**

Below is another excerpt from the same article by Timiraos.

*

*

Does people need to be told what and how to think by experts all the time? Allow me again to stretch out issues. Morality as well as economy, overly being said with no cease would annul rational inferences of independent minds.

*****

Rational anticipation by Juliette Masch (7/28)

**