Joe Biden Was Never President

No one truly believes, under scrutiny, that Joe Biden received 81 million real, lawful, American votes and there is absolutely no proof that he did, anywhere. There never has been. There was a fake election followed by the reporting of fake vote totals. There was an announcement of the “winner,” reported by the fake news, days after the election. The Uniparty Left staged fake celebrations in the streets of liberal enclaves, masked to the nines, blowing little horns, ringing little bells, and drinking cheap sparkling wines, declaring victory over the underclass, marking their territory like so many pink-haired cats and dogs, to let everyone know they were proud of themselves.

Fake “risk-limiting audits” (and the like) were performed to “verify” results produced by machines specifically designed to obscure election results, many of those operating under fake certifications. Secretaries of State who were themselves unable to prove their legitimacy, having been installed in office after their own fake elections, submitted certifications of the reported results. State governors of similar status added their rubber stamps. The next thing we knew, Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes, and a roster of TPUSA influencers and Color Revolutionists were staging a fake “insurrection” while Nancy Pelosi’s daughter filmed it. The manufactured mayhem was designed to justify police violence against innocent Americans a la the Maidan Massacre followed by a months-long crackdown against Americans who did not want to be ruled by corrupt, globalist perverts, while the fake news began broadcasting the same handful of short clips, proving the violence, on repeat for weeks on end. The Very Violent Insurrection was then exploited by the government to claim additional powers, a la the Reichstag Fire, enhancing censorship, expanding the surveillance state, and recasting common dissent as domestic terrorism.

On January 20th, 2021, while the federal city was shrouded in cloud cover, a national television audience was treated to images of Joe Biden going through (some of) the motions of an inauguration, staged and filmed on a bright, sunny day, somehow. Soldiers occupying the federal city greeted the procession of Biden’s motorcade with turned backs and Biden arrived to a locked front door at the White House. For the next four years, the withering, old fool was broadcast on Screens across the country reminding us that he was our ruler and what great power he would wield against us, as our nation’s fake president, if we did not start saying nicer things about him. The political parties, TV Characters, journalists, influencers, corporate America, Big Tech, and academia attested to the realness of his presidency, acting as though they knew for certain that Joe Biden had won a real election by receiving 81 million real, lawful, American votes despite there being no proof of that sort of thing happening, or even of the possibility that it could have. (It really could not have—the vote total increased from 136 million “votes” to 158 million “votes” in one presidential election cycle and we were told this was due to mail-in voting, instituted to provide access to the ballot box during a fake pandemic. There is no proof the size of this increase is possible, much less true.)

Over this period, we are told Joe Biden, as fake president, signed new “legislation” into “law,” presumably with the same autopen he used for his (now narratively nullified) pardons and Executive Orders. Biden was said to have passed budgets that appropriated fiat (fake) dollars (created by the people who place Uniparty politicians in office through fake elections) to the advancement of an agenda serving the interests of the very same institutions confidently attesting to the fake president’s legitimacy in office.

The fake president operated primarily from fake “Oval Office(s)”—one constructed on a sound stage in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building across the street from the White House and another, a perfect replica of the ‘Biden White House,’ constructed in a different office building, down a different street, in the same federal city. That is, when he was not operating from his vacation home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware (to the extent he operated anywhere). To be clear, Biden’s two fake White Houses are not any kind of proof of his illegitimacy, nor proof that an entire fake presidency could possibly be stage-produced. Our media and politicians would never collude with corporations, global bankers, and global governance bodies to fool us about the nature of our existence. Certainly, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would never. They simply would not.

As Commander-in-Chief, the fake president spoke forcefully about fake negotiations with foreign leaders and exercised fake leverage to bring fake wars to their beginning or end while his fake Secretary of Defense disappeared for days at a time and the cackling degenerate pretending to be vice president let us know that it was wrong for a big country to be mean to a little country—it just wasn’t fair. Through his term as fake president, the fake CIC failed to exercise the legitimate authority of his office in any discernible capacity. The foreign policy staffers in his administration generally had no idea what was even happening—from Afghanistan, to Ukraine, to the Nord Stream pipeline, to Israel, to China—the fake president’s fake administration was cluelessly reacting to unprovable News reports as though they were only receiving the same information as the average viewer of MSNBC or Fox News. For his own part, the fake president professed no command over the constantly changing facts of a single national security situation and, when he was placed in situations where his first-hand mastery over events would be questioned, he came equipped with note cards and teleprompters. The answers to reporters’ supposedly spontaneous questions were prepared for him in advance, so he could attempt to read them in a way that seemed natural and competent.

Biden was assigned full responsibility for the massive failures of a Uniparty agenda that had been pursued for many decades, as any good stand-in, scapegoat, or ‘fall guy’ would. Most of Biden’s time was spent sleeping at the beach, licking ice cream cones, falling off bicycles, slipping on stairs, and sniffing children. Some of it was spent giving hysterical speeches about his efforts to conquer various forms of extremism, at times whispering to convey seriousness and sincerity, screaming to project power and authority to obscure the clear understanding that his actions (and his personal faculties) suggested he had neither, and mumbling gibberish so nonsensical that it defeated his other strategies. The fake president’s viability finally evaporated when he participated in a televised fake debate against Donald Trump before either of them had officially received their party’s nomination to be on the ballot in 2024’s fake elections. Soon after, Biden was unceremoniously removed as the ‘candidate’ (in a social media post of a ‘letter’ written on non-presidential stationary) and replaced with the aforementioned cackling degenerate without a nomination process.

The former fake vice president staged fake rallies, sometimes piggybacking on popular entertainers to portray herself as the one who drew their crowds, sometimes the campaign paying to fly supporters around the country to events, all in order to make her candidacy seem popular and viable, though it never was. She lost the fake election of 2024—one the country would never have accepted as legitimate if the Screen said she had “won.” On election night, the result was portrayed as a Trump landslide. Then, in the days and weeks to follow, the vote totals were backfilled with “late-arriving ballots” in races around the country to erase the size of Trump’s “popular vote victory” which, we should remember, is not a real thing. The down-ballot races were called as the Uniparty had selected them, their results totally anomalous given Trump’s “landslide.” (This went as I projected it would in January of 2024.)

Many people will (somehow, still) recoil from some of the claims above, believing they are somewhere between unproven and totally outlandish. Generally, this response is the result of some pretty obvious and spectacular logical fallacies having been ingrained as cognitive cyphers, now incessantly applied for the sake of expediency. It is not smart to think, for instance, that if a claim were true, the mainstream media would tell us. It is not smart to give the benefit of the doubt to the State, nor the State’s statistics, nor its official records, nor its many organs, yet we allow our reality to be constructed on appeal to the State’s authority as the source of truth. It is not sound thinking that leads us to let the State function as the final arbiter, especially if we haven’t the faintest justification for believing the people directing the course of our lives have the slightest regard for our well-being. It is not wise to believe that any objector should be forced to prove the results of a fake election false when the people are barred from accessing the evidence, especially when it is impossible to make the positive case that the results are real and true. It is unsurvivably stupid to think that the State, having abandoned its proper form as the agent and possession of the people, should be trusted about the contents of the people’s own information while it bars the people from accessing the information that is rightfully theirs. It is not smart to assume that what can be faked is limited by the scale of the on-Screen production and the extent of scripted behavior required to make the fake news plausibly believable to a significant portion of people. Yet these are the rationalizations we use to avoid more difficult discussions about the role of our government in our lives.

Deep down, we all know this. But then, we have been so thoroughly programmed to believe our own friends and neighbors are actually our true enemies that we allow the State to flagrantly violate its role, and our rights, all so that we might finally conquer our loved ones at a game of Links’n’Sources. Why must our families and coworkers be defeated? Because they watch, on the Screen, different programs than we do. It’s like hating people because they are fans of the wrong football team. Oh wait, we have that, too.

We ignore what the State is and what the State does because we have been trained instead to wage war upon our loved ones in order to save the world (for what, if not our loved ones?) by winning fake elections. The State has replaced God, as it does in any collapsing Regime proxy. If the State tells us Caligula’s horse was to be president, we would listen at full attention while Megyn Kelly tells us how a certain phrase in the Constitution allows for horses to be appointed in such a time as this. We would read think-pieces in intellectual internet magazines about what it means for gender relations that we elected a horse.

To the extent our deference to the State might preserve our nation and our heritage (as Statists claim it does when defending their servitude), they would be preserved in name only. Our worship of the State is, instead, an affront to our nation and our heritage and it is an ever-present danger to ourselves, our property, and our progeny. We have adopted the notion that one half of the state is less corrupt than the other and, since all power belongs to the State, the less corrupt half of the State is the only entity than can save us from the more corrupt half of itself. The State taught us this. Then it taught us that the half of the population we blame for all the problems likewise blames our half, an unresolvable paradox that will have us warring over trivialities until our dying days. This framing is ridiculous on its face. It has poisoned our relationships with our families and friends, divided communities against themselves and, the people distracted, allowed the adversarial element—that possesses people of all identities—to dominate us completely. The government is no longer the agent of the people. The people have been conditioned to see themselves as subjects of the government.

About whichever of the above claims you find most off-putting, ask yourselves whether the claims seems easier to believe now, in the first days of 2026, than when I began saying these very same things five years ago. Have the claims weakened or strengthened? Should they be taken more seriously or less? Will more people in six months agree that the above claims are true, or will more people grow to see them as outlandish? Of course, more people will align with these beliefs now than in the first days of 2021, as has been the case every day since the Very Violent Insurrection. Has anyone, of any identity or political persuasion, come, over the last five years, to see the system as more legitimate and less corrupt? If that person exists, he must be some demented, mad genius who sees through to a world beyond our knowing. The acceptance of the views expressed above will continue moving in only one direction for the foreseeable future. It makes sense, therefore, to assume a directionally maximalist stance on the society-wide adoption of sensible opinions heretofore dismissed by authority—authority has collapsed. It makes sense to do this immediately, being already five years behind and counting.

Throughout the years of Biden’s so-called presidency, the Uniparty- and Regime-aligned institutions went along with the farce. They conducted business as usual by way of the Regime’s perpetually captured bureaucratic administrative state, which itself conducts the business of the perpetually illegitimate government, operating fully outside of Constitutional bounds, regardless of who is said to be occupying the Oval Office. Money flowed to NGOs and corporate interests and, of course, to corrupt Uniparty-aligned politicians, illegitimately in office, throughout the states. The administrative state facilitates and enforces all of this through unaccountable, anti-constitutional, so-called “independent agencies.” The people’s representatives, including the president, are rendered unnecessary. The system keeps running with or without them.

Much of this activity was portrayed as Democrat corruption and incompetence while Republicans dutifully filled their roles as a check and balance. Their job was to provide narratively plausible controlled opposition, whenever necessary, no matter how absurd and unconvincing their performances were. Yes, they staged hearings and filed useless articles of impeachment but rarely did they speak of our fake elections, nor our fake president, nor the danger both posed to our nation. The media and influencers “on the right” (though not really) fell in line as they always do. Like the politicians they invited to be guests on their shows, the hosts pretended to defend the country from the Democrat scourge by focusing on the same issues Democrats wanted front and center—discussions of skin color and genitals, fake news about “wars,” and election cycles. Social justice became DEI which became “wokeness” and the ConInc media ecosystem has now spent a decade focused on what online “leftists” think and bragging about being able to accurately discern who has the weewees and who has the hoohas. None of the anti-woke crusaders at the Blaze or The Daily Weimar pursued the truth about our fake elections. None of them questioned Biden’s legitimacy. They spent their days regurgitating coordinated talking points about the political Soap Opera while digitally stroking Elon Musk for saving our nation with his “freedom of speech-not-reach” platform.

At no point did anyone from either side of the Uniparty in the political establishment, the mainstream media (print, TV, legacy social media, and artificial intelligence), corporate America, academia, entertainment, etc… ever take the true state of our government, nor its relationship to the people it purportedly governs, into account. Their worldview for the last five years has been based on something fundamentally incoherent. The totality of their thinking about any subject even remotely related to politics has been conceived within a false paradigm that does not represent a discernible, possible reality.

There have been many indications over the past many weeks that we have reached the point on the preplanned narrative timeline when the obvious and undeniable illegitimacy of our elections will be accepted into the Central Narrative. In fact, the claims that were once censored on social media and ridiculed by our media betters are now said to be “set[ting] the internet on fire.”

• “After years of diligently writing about Georgia’s Fulton County election, reporting by Brianna Lyman at The Federalist seems to have set the internet on fire regarding the 2020 election by simply reporting that the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections (FCBRE) finally admitted it fraudulently counted roughly 315,000 votes.” Link

• “A judge has cleared the way for the Georgia State Election Board to obtain Fulton County ballots and other documents from the 2020 election.

  Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney on Friday ruled that the election board is well within its authority to request the information it has sought for more than a year. He ordered the county to provide an itemized estimate of the cost of complying with the subpoenas.” Link

• Disgraced Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis recently testified about her fake RICO indictment of Donald Trump for his efforts to challenge the (unconstitutional and, more importantly, fake) 2020 election. Her indictment, doomed from the start, sought to prosecute President Trump for the execution of his presidential duties on the basis that “he knew” the 2020 election was free, fair, and properly decided even though he, as a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, knew better than absolutely anyone how false that claim was. The indictment itself appeared online before the incompetent prosecutor held a televised press conference that evening in primetime, complete with breathless coverage from the mainstream media. Willis has been personally disgraced, she was disqualified from the prosecution, and her always-fake indictment, based on a white paper from the Color Revolutionist Brookings Institute and hatchet-man, Norm Eisen, has been dropped.

• The Tina Peters saga marches on, currently in the midst of various court proceedings. This follows a “pardon” by President Trump. Peters, the Mesa County (CO) clerk, was tried in a kangaroo court on similarly manufactured charges and now, we are told, sits rotting in a cell, serving a sentence for attempting to save the nation after the fake 2020 election by preserving records her job required her to preserve, before being spirited away in Mike Lindell’s private jet.

• The Minnesota government’s ever-expanding fraud scandal focused on the Regime-imported Somalian community seems poised to blossom into a reprise of the years-old story about Ilhan Omar’s friends and neighbors running a well-funded ballot purchasing scheme.

• President Trump directed his Attorney General, Pam Bondi (via social media) to focus attention on the fake elections of 2020 and the fraud committed during and, perhaps more importantly, since. (Much like the “pardon” of Tina Peters, this statement from Trump lays down a record of some support for the current info ops promising to finally bring the country the truth about our elections.

• Emerald Robinson and Patrick Byrne have spent the last month disseminating one of the dumbest narratives imaginable in an era of almost exclusively dumb narratives about how a weirdo CIA asset and former corporate front man (Byrne) has spent $80 million of his own money saving our fake elections from being “stolen” by Venezeula’s vicious Dancing Dictator, Nicolas Maduro. The story—a 2020 rehash about Smartmatic, Hugo Chavez, the Phillippines, and Sidney Powell—is being bandied about on the premise that, actually, Maduro steals elections in 72 countries via election machines. She has been previewing this scripted info op for years. To be clear, it is nonsensical to say that “Venezuela” “stole” fake elections. If “Venezuela” had the power to install its chosen candidates in countries around the world, how is it also a pariah state that can be a defenseless victim of military incursion? Believing “Venezuela” steals elections around the world also assumes a delusional view of how nation-states operate in the geopolitical reality, where both warring factions exist in positions of power everywhere. The people who clamored for Maduro’s removal from power (and were for years prior) are fully aligned with the Uniparty/Regime faction in the United States. They have spent eighteen months supporting the Color Revolutionist and globalist clown, Maria Corina Machado. It also assumes a delusional view of how elections operate—elections are not just “stolen” by machines altering votes. This assumes that elections are only manipulable in one way, but elections are fake. They are not how power is transferred among warring factions (no, not the false Democrat-Republican divide). If the voting machines were removed, elections would still be nothing more than self-deluding, participatory psyops whereby the people go through the motions to convince themselves that anything bad the government does was their own fault or the fault of their friends and neighbors. In the meantime, the people waste countless hours following the Soap Opera, “getting involved,” waging emotional warfare on their own families, and wasting untold sums of money, all to make sure the brand of propaganda they enjoy is named the “winner.” Then the game starts over again.

• On Venezuela, Donald Trump dismissed Maria Hakuna Matata as lacking the support of the Venezuelan people, and keeping Maduro’s number-two in place to run the country. For her part, Delcy Rodriguez says Maduro is still the president and that Maduro himself implemented the Continuity of Government program Venezuela is currently under. Trump told Sean Hannity that Venezuela might have elections sometime, but they aren’t ready for them now.

  Trump noted, in an interview with Reuters, that the United States might not be ready for elections either, commenting: “It's some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don't win the midterms,” Trump said. He boasted that he had accomplished so much that “when you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election.” He’s right. We should not need to watch another fake election play out on television. This is not about which side of the Uniparty might “win” a fake election. I could not possibly care less whether the Screen credits the Republicans or the Democrats for implementing (or stalling) the Great Reset agenda. We should not waste another year of our lives fighting about which characters we like watching on which daytime Soap Opera or Reality Show, then wasting our time and money helping contestants “win” fake elections, then casting votes we know to be irrelevant in order to convince ourselves, on behalf of the Regime, that we chose whatever it is we get and are therefore responsible for our suffering.

• In October, the election machine company at the center of the election controversy (despite being one of many companies producing the same useless systems), was sold to *gasp* a Republican. Liberty Vote (formerly Dominion!), was sold to Scott Leindecker, a man whose prior firm, KNOWiNK, produced electronic poll books that were so good, they won the approval of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, an extraconstitutional entity that helps guarantee the lawful integrity of our fake elections. Assigning ownership of the voting machines to the other side of the Uniparty divide means that Democrat supporters will accept the flaws in the machine segment of our election system that they spent the last five years defending, after having spent the prior 15 years decrying their capacity to create fraud. This was extensively documented in the popular HBO documentary, Kill Chain.

• At the “AmFest” Soap Opera Convention, Turning Point USA’s recent college field trip, the Judeo Christian-cloaked, hundred-million-dollar per-year Regime propaganda network’s spectacularly grieving new CEO declared that TPUSA was fully committed to winning the 2026 midterms and then achieving a resounding victory for JD! Hamel in 2028. This despite the 2028 election being three years away and no one anywhere having chosen JD! Hamel for anything (save for a Truth Social post by Donald Trump announcing JD! Hamel would play the part of “running mate” in the fake campaign leading up to the fake election—the post came two days after Assassination Event #1, itself two days after JD! Hamel’s “mentor,” Peter Thiel was engaged in a shouting match with Uniparty Left megadonor Reid Hoffman at a billionaire confab in Idaho about martyring Donald Trump). Turning Point USA, along with The Daily Weimar’s Ben Shapiro, were anointed as the people who “won” Republicans the fake election of 2024 by the Regime’s own New York Times, for creating an “ecosystem of influencers.” In addition to being the face of the paid political propaganda network, TPUSA also fronted election queen, Scott Presler’s, so-called “ballot chasing” operation that encouraged voter registration, mail-in voting, and early voting—all pillars of the rigged election psyop. Midterm madness began months ago, more than a year before this year’s fake elections. While we build to the fever pitch that will dominate 2026, Republicans are resigning or foregoing re-election in significant numbers (more), allowing the opportunity for us to ‘meet’ the latest crop of contestants. This is the Uniparty Right machine (much of it downstream from Thiel) refocusing attention from the “Charlie Kirk” Trauma Event to the dirty work of “winning” fake elections to keep the Controlled Opposition Dynamic in place.

• The latest rerun news cycle of inactive registrations being removed from voter rolls has dropped in Oregon. “State officials acknowledge there are about 800,000 inactive registrations total, roughly 20% of Oregon’s voter rolls, though they stress multiple times in the press release that inactive voters do not currently receive ballots, saying at one point, "again, none of the individuals associated with these records will receive ballots, and these inactive records have no impact on Oregon elections."" Certainly, voter registration databases are a significant source of fraud, and the potential for fraud, in our elections. Still, removing inactive voters from voter rolls is a system-preserving half-measure. Assuming that voter rolls are necessary (they’re not, North Dakota does not even register voters) and that voter rolls can be well kept (doubtful), the solution would still have to include a full purge of the voter registration databases before they are rebuilt from nothing. Finding “inactive” registrations and removing them does not make our elections real, and it is nonsensical to think elections can be made “a little less fake” by employing half-measures that fail to accomplish the task for which they were designed.

• Uniparty Right characters looking to burnish their reputation as champions of election integrity (despite never having lifted a finger on the issue) came out in support of Trump’s recent mention of the SAVE Act, a piece of legislation being moved through the illegitimate Congress. It is claimed that the SAVE Act will stop illegal aliens from voting in our elections by requiring the people to have verified identification when they… register to vote. The voter rolls would not be fully purged in this scenario, either. We would simply trust the state to identify and remove the registrations of illegal aliens. The system will be fixed, those profiting from it tell us, by encoding more rules into the broken system.

Stories of the kind listed here are all portrayed as “breaking news” when they happen—issues that were knowable five (or more) years ago are being presented as revelations in real time. This is an intentional falsification of the timeline, a distortion of the when, for the sake of the propaganda’s virality—no one wants old news. This falsification should not be overlooked, regardless of the truth value of the who, what, where, why, and how. So thrilled we are that the truth is finally coming to light, we ignore that it does so on the back of an intentional deception. We ignore the current deception, too busy celebrating the end of the prior deception. To a significant portion of the American public, the performative revelation of five-year-old news will be understood as breaking news. Most of us have not deeply engaged issues of fake elections and political illegitimacy, except insofar as was necessary to convince ourselves that nothing is wrong with our elections, not really. When we finally accept that, actually, everything is wrong with our elections, we will claim this shift is due to new information coming to light, the breaking news. The consensus opinion shifts as a function of the mainstream, scripted, scheduled news cycle. Funny trick, that. The planned reaction from “influencers” will follow the storyline. The collective will respond as planned: Maybe elections haven’t been totally above board. We really should do something to fix them.

This will not indicate that the people have “woken up,” sorry to say. It will mean people have simply adopted a new, false belief, induced by a manipulation of the informational timeline. People who have been deceived for five years will be deceived once more. They will perceive themselves, however, as having been right for the last five years, according to the former consensus understanding, then continuing to be right as their position shifts with the emergent consensus. These revelations, and the scripted reactions to them, will be generally perceived as the system’s willingness to correct itself. It is nothing of the sort. It is nothing more than a mass media, public relations campaign to admit the problem, another campaign to offer a solution, and another still to convince people the solution has been implemented and the problem has been solved. A series of marketing campaigns is all that is required to fix the problem of distrust in our elections, the only relevant problem from a Regime perspective. The people who use fake elections to control nations are not concerned that the elections are fake. They are concerned that the voters believe the elections are not fake.

This style of long-delayed election disclosure is nothing more than the Central Narrative incorporating an undeniable fact, presented in the form of a limited hangout, after having spent five years exploiting the misunderstanding it created. When the mea culpa narrative cycle concludes, the system will offer its own solution. Its messengers will claim the new way is certain to provide resolutions to some specific subset of the total election problems under the assumption that if only this set of problems were solved, it would be enough—election integrity would be restored and, more importantly, the people’s trust in the system would be restored with it (no matter how corrupted it remains).

At no point will the narrative cycle help the people actually understand the truth of our elections, our nation, our fellow Americans, or ourselves as a result of this process. The process will not reattach anyone to a discernible reality within Reality Prime. It will not achieve accountability for the countless malicious servants of the Regime who profit from protecting, and thereby perpetuating, the system, no matter the fallout. Something that could have been easily understood five years ago will be obscured in a slightly altered way. The conditioned misunderstanding will be updated to a new, conditioned misunderstanding. To incorporate the emergent consensus belief in early 2026 about that which could have been known in late 2020 is not to be operating in real time, it is to be trapped five years behind, in the informational past.

To have accepted the truth of our elections in late 2020 would have sent one down a different path over the years since, when contemplating our politics, our polity, and our place in the world. Consider the ways we might come to know our world as different than what our conditioning would otherwise suggest. What, for instance, would be the proof that we are a fifty-fifty country? The polls check themselves against the results of fake elections. Election results are made narratively plausible by the polls. How, then, are we certain that the people are irreconcilably divided? To know our elections are fake is to know that our political parties are not actually opposed or actually trying to defeat one another. What would it mean for the performative nature of our politics that the people with the Rs next to their names are not substantively different than the people with the Ds next to their names? What would it mean, geopolitically speaking, that our superpower adversaries did not recognize FPOTUS Biden as the leader of the nation or its military? What does it mean that our adversaries did not exploit the presence of a fake and illegitimate president and instead maintained the structure of the same plans put in place during Trump’s first term, even though we were told he was not president between January 20, 2021 and January 20, 2025? What would it mean about our military, or alternatively our ostensible allies and adversaries that (psyops aside) things remained relatively stable? To satisfy ourselves with this delayed election disclosure timeline, five years late and stunningly incomplete, treating it as breaking news in real time, ensures there will be no significant correction. We will go on, equally hoodwinked, just in a slightly different way.

No real solution is possible without first understanding the totality of the real problem. Understanding the totality of the problem requires understanding that the Uniparty establishment knows our elections are fake, our politicians are illegitimate, and that our ignorance can be perpetually exploited for as long as it lasts. Our representatives are not confused about the nature of our elections. They have not been stymied in seeking redress. They are servants of the system, profiting off the system’s exploitation of the people. The people could spend the next two decades working, state-by-state, to achieve some combination of in-person voting on Election Day only, hand-marked and hand-counted paper ballots, voter ID, etc… and it would be a win, not for the people, but for the Regime, having bought itself another twenty years of the people’s passive consent to be illegitimately ruled. Elections cannot be a little bit rigged, a little bit stolen, or a little bit fake. Election legitimacy is binary. Elections are either transparently and verifiably legitimate or they are not legitimate at all. Election integrity cannot be marginally improved, step by step. Fake elections do not become real by adding a requirement for voter ID. It is not even possible that they become more real through these fixes. They remain fake until they are not fake, if that is possible, and it may not be. This isn’t a new concern. It was with us prior to the founding era and only subsides when the people’s attention does.

Even if elections magically became real and legitimate as a result of being angry at “Venezuela,” for instance, the illegitimacy of past elections—and their consequences—must be resolved. This requires the total nullification of all legislation at every level, including every dollar of odious debt created by the excess spending of the illegitimate government, going as far back as required to prove governing legitimacy through verifiable elections. If this requires nullification of every bit of law that is not the Constitution and state constitutions themselves, so be it. If that is not enough, we must go further. The people must demand it or it will not happen. If it is not possible to nullify the entirety of FPOTUS Biden’s legacy, why is Trump already using the “Biden autopen” issue to achieve this very same effect under a cover story understandable even by people still trapped years behind in the informational past?

Any regular reader of these writings or listener of my podcast over the last five years will know that I have always taken for granted the eventual public acceptance, in full, of the fact that Joe Biden did not receive 81 million real, lawful, American votes and did not win the 2020 election. Donald Trump knew this. Military intelligence knew this. The leaders of foreign superpowers absolutely knew it which is why they chose to deal with Trump rather than the fake president, Joe Biden, throughout Trump’s second term. It was always true. More people were realizing it by the day. It will achieve mass awareness. When it does, we can expect major adjustments across the board, in every part of life that is affected by the fakeness and illegitimacy of the American government or, rather, the foreign occupation of the American government and the Soap Opera that keeps it going. For most people, those adjustments will begin sometime in the future (relative to this writing). For myself and many others, those adjustments began in 2020 and have continued for five years. Those who called Joe Biden “president” and pretended we were still doing ‘politics as normal,’ remained in the past on an informational timeline relative to the nature of our elections. Their thoughts about our government have incorporated a massive, glaring, obvious falsehood as a foundational truth. What compounding errors in judgment does a mistake like this cause in each of us individually, let alone across a society? It turns out that, over time, it is unequivocally better to interact with the base-layer reality (Reality Prime) than with the Abstraction layered over it, no matter the material rewards on offer. But the adjustments seemed too daunting and it seemed like “no one else was doing it,” so we remained trapped in the past, where it was safe. (Safe from what?)

Because the truth was unavoidable, the flaws in our elections would eventually be incorporated into the Central Narrative. This would be done in a way that would successfully manage the fallout while herding dissenters back into the pen, satisfied that they had been properly placated. From the newfound comfort of a media-generated consensus finally coalescing around their position, even election integrity activists will be promoting the new system as a substantial improvement. We should expect to be treated to a public relations campaign designed to convince us that those credited with finally bringing the truth to light are fully supportive of the new system. These heroes, our new election Expert class, will promote a new system, the implementation of which was planned well in advance (certainly prior to the public outcry for a new system). It will be ready to be implemented on a condensed timeline. The need for the new system will appear, that need will be immediately filled, and the public will immediately accept it, because the programming is designed to create exactly that. If we behave, perhaps the new and improved (though still irredeemably fake and illegitimate) election system will be made available for the fake midterms of 2026. The Uniparty will heavily incentivize the adoption of the new system from both sides. New voices will be made popular across all forms of mainstream media and social media due to their effectiveness in selling the new system.

Everyone will agree that our elections are the most important thing in the world, even though they’ve been rigged, stolen, and, more importantly, fake for our entire lives, which means they could not have been important in any real way. The new system gives us the only chance we have for our side of the Uniparty to “win” the fake elections, we will be told, and the world will end if things stay the way they are now. We will be told there was no real downside to the living under the government our fake elections produced, certainly nothing that cannot be cured with more fake elections, now new and improved! The real threat to our country is not fake elections. The real threat comes if we allow racists to keep racing and feminists to keep badgering and Muslim hordes to keep installing Sharia laws as though they were the ones who had “won” our fake elections.

Once both sides under the sway of the Controlled Opposition Dynamic accept that the election system has failed in major ways, we will be told that everyone is happy to accept the new system, even if that system is equally (or more) rigged. From the perspective of those who control nations through the preposterous farce of elections, preserving a fully controllable election system is the number-one priority. Elections coerce the concession of power and conferral of consent to be governed. All that must be done to preserve that system is to make sure people believe they are being treated fairly by the new system, even if convincing them requires a substantial mea culpa for failing to treat them fairly before. This is the worst-case scenario for anyone who cares about the proper representation of the people’s interests and proper lawful, legitimate government. It would be the codifying of permanent Regime control under the guise of seizing back control by the people. It is total victory for the Regime—achievable even after admitting the system was rigged on their behalf the entire time. This is accomplished through the Regime’s successful manipulation of the informational timeline and our willingness to remain trapped in the past and ignorant of the trick. (A controlled demolition followed by a systemic replacement seems to be just over the horizon when it comes to our financial system as well, or has the Great Reset been stopped?)

If it is possible that we could return to some semblance of regular order in our politics and government (and it may not be), our first priority should be to understand that our elections are not only rigged or stolen, but fake. We must then refuse further participation in these self-deluding psyops until a system of the people’s design and choosing is fully functional. This means the people not only must choose to withhold their funding of candidates and their time campaigning on their party’s behalf, but also to withhold our attention from the constant election drama on the Screen. We knew a time before this, when we were not perpetually obsessed with, and agitated over, the political Soap Opera. We the people are working in opposition to our own interests because we are beholden to a false construct. Our participation in the system is our preservation of the system. More importantly, refusing participation in fake elections means refusing to recognize the government’s current capacity to write our laws or direct our behavior in any way, as no one in public office (save, perhaps, President Trump) can prove his legitimacy. Pretending to hold office illegitimately is treason, especially when it is done on behalf of a foreign entity, and globalism is necessarily a foreign agenda. The government, as it stands, does not have the legitimate authority to replace our elections system nor, for that matter, to conduct elections. The only workable solution is radical decentralization, but that is a separate matter.

Speaking of Trump’s legitimacy, here he is in his Super Bowl Sunday interview with Bret Baier in early 2025. In it, responding to a question from Bret Baier about the reported results of the fake 2024 election, he says, “Well if you believe the whole thing. The whole thing is ridiculous.” President Donald J Trump called his own great comeback victory in 2024 a fake election.

For telling the truth about elections, it will (once again) be claimed by Statists that I do not care about winning the fake midterm elections of 2026. They will attempt to use this as a cudgel to turn my friends and my audience against me, as though my friends and audience are somehow unfamiliar with the positions that I have stated, nonstop, for five years. In this case, the Statists are correct. I do not care about which side of the Uniparty “wins” fake elections in the same way I do not care about whether a stranger in Montana drives a Chevy or Ford or whether my kindergarten teacher, whose name I struggle to remember, prefers Pepsi to Coke. We are ruled by a one-party totalitarian collectivist State where actors, criminals, perverts, and grifters sell us a techno-police state at home and forever-wars abroad whenever necessary. “Necessary,” in this case, means whenever foreign leaders say mean things about bankers or Jews or Jewish bankers. The global Regime is not going to give away control over the most powerful nation on earth because Screen-addicted Americans show up to a local school cafeteria, once every four years, to press some buttons on an iPad Screen attached to a black-box before heading home to spend the evening watching numbers appear on a different Screen on the wall, hoping to hear that the color red defeated the color blue. A Uniparty stooge with an R next to his name will be announced as the winner or a Uniparty stooge with a D next to zher name will be announced as the winner. The only way to win that game is not to play. The entities responsible for designing the system certainly would not hand control of the United States over to their enemies because they “lost” a fake election… one they happen to control.

I am told that talking about our fake elections might cause fewer people show up at the polls, thereby causing “us” (who?) to “lose” a fake election for which the result has been decided in advance. Throughout the last five years, the manufactured consensus agreed that despite being obviously fake, our elections should be treated as obviously real. You know, for the sake of the country. Our mission, in sacrifice to this great nation and its founders, is to help powerful strangers on the internet convince our friends and loved ones that they must vote in elections we know to be fake, so the people aligned with those powerful strangers can seize additional power. We think this makes sense and that it is noble. We were told this was a mission to save the world. By the same powerful strangers on the internet who hope to increase their power by “winning” fake elections. Nothing can stop our victory from coming, unless we refuse to vote in fake elections.

Apologies to you, my fair Standard-Issue Villager, but something else is happening. You know, like you always say it is. Do I know what? Nope. I sure don’t. I also don’t pretend to. I do not need to know the ins and outs of a secret military plan that only Donald Trump, (up to) nine other people, and (somehow) tens of thousands of people on the internet are read-in on to know that our elections are fake. I can know it by observing reality. The conclusions I draw on the basis of that observation are more important in my personal calculus than being told by an anonymous internet account that the military is the only way. Wait… if the military is the only way, then why do I need to convince the people at my gym to vote in fake elections? The people who decoded the world’s most secret information ever posted on a public message board know the elections are fake. And sure, they’re afraid to say it, but that is only because they’re afraid to break consensus with their peers.

People who want to be “the media now” cannot (and should not) be trusted as long as they remain unmistakably terrified of breaking consensus with their perceived in-group. An in-group which they have (of course) misidentified by overestimating their own status. This means that they’re actually unmistakably terrified of breaking in-group consensus they pretend to share with a nameless, higher-level out-group that rules their lives. That’s just being a loyal, groveling subject. Why would anyone want a media full of loyal, groveling subjects of the State to be the people reporting to them about the malfeasance of the State, now or at any other time? What would be the difference between that and the media we have now? If there’s no difference, then why are these grovelers identified as truthful or independent? Pleas for “unity” are literally pleas to avoid breaking in-group consensus. Why would anyone trust a person who prioritizes in-group consensus over truth? Useful idiots, who believe they are online commandos in a volunteer army have made a habit of enacting communist struggle sessions to marginalize anyone who breaks consensus, ignorant to the fact they are inadvertently supporting the wrong info op. There is no mystery in how this happened—simply examine the incentives they respond to and the punishments they avoid.

In the next move, we breakers of consensus are reframed as “doomers,” for saying the thing people are afraid to admit, even when the same people know it to be true. They are afraid to break consensus because that is when the social punishments arrive. Which punishments? The same punishments they themselves have meted out as the groveling Gatekeepers of the Central Narrative—reputational damage, ostracization, and exile. Treat others as you would wish to be treated, unless those others will not publicly promise to encourage internet strangers to vote in fake elections. Where we go one we go all, except if the one sees things differently than the all, and then that one must be destroyed. Whose system operates this way when it is coercing compliance? I could swear I’ve heard about this sort of thing happening before.

We are reminded, by those accidentally protecting a manufactured consensus, to be careful who we follow. We need to follow only those people committed to saying those things that receive the Gatekeepers’ approval. In order to think for ourselves we must delegate our judgment to consensus. We can trust them to tell us who to trust, just like they always have. And they trust the plan. If we don’t trust them to tell us who to trust, then we don’t trust the plan. The logic literally invents itself, ad hoc. It is godlike in its mysteriousness. What more could we possibly need?

As the ones sacrificing their lives to make sure Fox News defeats MSNBC, they occupy the moral high-ground. From their lofty internet posts—based on follower count and consensus-protection “unity” index—they decide on what issues, and in what ways, it is acceptable for their own loved ones to be lied to by powerful strangers on the Screen. Secret white hats, as the story goes, need to be able to lie, at will, to our families and friends. If they are prevented from deceiving our loved ones and strangers alike, then it will become impossible to complete their secret plan that nothing can stop from coming. The goal of the secret plan? Apparently, the plan is to accomplish nothing more than transferring political and narrative power from one side of the Uniparty to the other until the Great Reset is fully implemented and these questions all become moot—the Machine will decide for us! Oh, and televised trials of THE DEEP STATE!!! and THE CLINTONS!!! A Nuremberg-style limited hangout will be staged, received with groveling applause, and the Gatekeepers will ride off into the sunset—the unsung band of American heroes who always knew Fox News was ‘comms’ and that ultimate truth could be discerned only through Kabbalistic number magic and by playing word Match online.

If patriots are in full control and nothing can stop what is coming, then surely elections are meaningless and no plan meant for any good could require us to waste our time obsessing over a political Soap Opera on the Screen whose outcome is pre-determined. We have real battles to win at home and in our communities. Surely, the good guys would want us to win those, individually, rather than spend our days online cheering as they do the secret thing nothing can stop. Why can’t we know the secret thing, if we would support them doing it? Shhhh! It’s a secret!

I am not, in fact, a doomer. I am absolutely certain that God wins. I try to stay diligent in my focus to act in His glorious, embodied example. Whatever happens in this domain is ultimately for good, for our grace, and for His loving glory. I also believe we have it within us to do better than we have done and to unshackle ourselves from our programming and conditioning. We can and will win, but not until we apprehend the true state of play in the real game and certainly not if our attention remains solely focused on the Screen, where our self-styled, mental super-soldiers are unwittingly defending the enemy’s system, and the enemy’s story, because the powerful internet strangers who have been lying to their loved ones, it turns out, have also lied to them. Those powerful internet strangers really do have a secret plan, sure, but what if we may have misidentified some of the secret white hats? Whoops, I guess. Who could know that placing one’s faith in powerful strangers on the internet was not the godly path? Hopefully there were not any other oversights of this variety.

There is nothing “doomy” about accepting that our elections are fake, and that our politics are the magnum opus of the Regime’s grand, centuries-long hoodwinking. I’m not even saying we cannot win this year. Victory just cannot come as the product of a fake election. It is an absolutely necessary condition of victory that we accept the true state of play in the real game. Without accepting the true state of our elections, and therefore our politics, our government, our nation, and ourselves, victory is not possible. The constant recasting of a series of insufficient half-measures as decisive victories provides a far better example of dooming. It is an active choice to perpetually accept not winning. It is the self-defeating promise of losing forever in order to keep accessing the system’s paltry rewards. Is it a worthwhile use of 2026 to devote our time and resources to ensuring the red side of the Uniparty defeats the blue side in another fake election? Or would our time be better spent coming to terms with the fact that our civilizational reality is something other than what we’ve been led to believe it is?

To accept half-measures as victories is to surrender whatever leverage the people hold while allowing the system to strengthen itself. To every system-oriented solution that comes ready-made with a marketing campaign and social-incentive package, our answer should be: Not good enough.

Believe what you will about the system’s state of control, it is still abundantly clear that the system requires the buy-in of the people. Are we really too timid to make demands? What brand of evil would the Regime have to inflict before we would become willing to make our voices heard? Have they not already inflicted it? If we are unwilling to acknowledge our real problems, how can we discern ways to solve them? We cannot even know what to demand, much less make demands. If we have no demands, if we are ultimately willing to settle for the system’s proposed solutions—to the problems the system itself has inflicted, and then lied about, in the interest of its own power and profit—we should be honest about our contentedness as subjects of the Regime. We should admit we are Statists and stop pretending to be patriots online, standing up to the greatest evil the world has ever known by reposting articles and video clips.

We should consider, at least, that claiming we will save all of humanity by perfecting the material world, but only after gaining the power to control others with a system of laws no one could ever possibly know in full—our power justified by presenting people the illusion of choice in fake elections—may not be God’s mission for our eternal souls.

It is possible, at least, that victory comes only through the practice of self-generated order that obviates the need for a system altogether—a circumstance that can only come into being when individuals choose, of their own accord, to follow the glorious, embodied example of Jesus Christ and that individual choice to follow is replicated across society. This is a possible future reality. It could, theoretically, happen in an instant, any instant. Perhaps the first step in that direction should be accepting, in full, that our elections are fake and acknowledging that Joe Biden was never president.

Acceptance of our base-layer reality allows us to elide the Abstraction and interact with Reality Prime. Only then can we begin the hard work of determining, and then incorporating, what fake elections and a fake president really mean, and adapt to the many permutations of necessary adjustments implied by our new paradigm. The picture will become much clearer over time. Imagine how it might look five years from now. If your imagining provides actionable insight, adopt that perspective immediately.

Taking the first step in the right direction is not scarier than taking another step in the wrong one, knowingly. Pursuing real victory in the real game is not pessimistic. It is not dooming. Refusing incentives, welcoming punishment, having faith that doing right leads to the right outcome, and breaking consensus alone because it is the right thing to do, is exactly as optimistic as we are instructed to be. It literally cannot be dooming.

Joe Biden did not receive 81 million real, lawful, American votes and no one believes he did (not in any way anyone is prepared to substantiate under exacting scrutiny). Joe Biden was never president. He was simply portrayed as president with extremely high production value and questionable authenticity. What he was said (and shown) to have done as president is already a nullity, as is the rest of our illegitimate and unelected government and the laws it claims to have passed. This is a judgment that is reserved to the people alone. It is one that each of us makes for ourselves.

I would never encourage you to trust me, an internet stranger. Nor would I encourage you to trust President Donald J Trump, a powerful internet stranger. But we have both been saying it since 2020.