I had a realization walking through Rome, but not the kind you’d expect. Not a romantic one. Not an “everything happens for a reason” one. The kind that makes you stop in the middle of a cobblestone street, look up at a sky that has watched civilizations rise and fall, and say, quietly to no one: Oh, fuck.
I’ve had a man puzzle for as long as I can remember. A crush. A boyfriend. A heartbreak. A possibility. A text message. A future. Always something to solve. For years, I thought this meant I was looking for love. Now I’m understanding that maybe I was looking for a puzzle.
I was walking through Rome, surrounded by ancient ruins, and somehow my brain was trying to solve a man. Again. Not even a new man. A familiar one. The details don’t really matter, because I’ve realized something a little embarrassing: the puzzle changes. The hobby stays the same. Different face, same mental activity — wondering, analyzing, decoding, gathering evidence like I’m preparing for trial in a court that doesn’t exist.
At various points in my life, I have confused hypervigilance with intuition and chemistry with an unsolved mystery. I’ve spent enough hours analyzing text messages that I could probably qualify for continuing education credits in forensic linguistics — trying to understand another person’s behavior before fully acknowledging my own experience.
Then another thought hit me. This might not actually be about men at all.
It’s about a nervous system that grew up trying to solve. When I think back, I can find a man puzzle attached to almost every chapter of my life — family vacations, girls trips, college, marriage, divorce. There was almost always a man somewhere in the background, occupying a small but persistent corner of my attention. A crush, a hope, a possibility, a problem. Something unresolved. Something that quietly pulled me out of my own life and into someone else’s. Something that kept me occupied in the eternal questions — does he like me, what does this mean — instead of the far more useful one: do I even like it here?
Apparently enlightenment was fine. But only if it texted back. I’ve even managed to bring this energy into meditation retreats, where I was supposedly transcending the ego while secretly wondering if someone had viewed my Instagram story. The commitment to the bit is honestly impressive.
Which raises a deeply uncomfortable question: who am I when there isn’t a puzzle?
I don’t know yet. I’m learning. And I suspect this may be my life’s work for the second half of life. But standing among structures that have survived two thousand years, I had a suspicion: some things are ancient because they’re history. Some things are ancient because they’re habits. And sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference.
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.