RSS Amplifier

Gate Access · Jul 27, 2026

Who does TSA Gold+ hurt most: travelers or TSA officers?

0
Sign in to vote or save

Caleb Harmon-Marshall · Gate Access

Today’s edition of Gate Access is available to all, courtesy of Going. With Going, travelers save $200 to $550 per ticket on average. Start a Premium or Elite membership and save today with code GATEACCESS30 via the website.

Happy Monday.

Charleston International Airport and Des Moines International Airport have now joined Tampa International Airport in deciding to transition to TSA Gold+.

I want to go deeper into this story because it has several angles I’d like to bring perspective to. Is TSA Gold+ a traveler issue, a worker issue, or a little of both?

I spoke to several TSA officers from TPA to help me with today’s edition of Gate Access. But first, here’s what’s on the radar.

Share Gate Access

On the radar

Thank you, CNN, Travel Weekly, USA Today, and others for recognizing my journalism. As an independent operator, I’m always honored when my work is seen.

Credit - Delta Air Lines

Share Gate Access

Did you miss last week’s release?

Thanks for reading Gate Access! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Who does TSA Gold+ hurt most: travelers or TSA officers?

Although frowned upon by advocates such as myself and federal union organizations such as AFGE, airport security privatization is not a new concept, and we have evidence that the model does work.

The push to adopt TSA Gold+ stems from the previous government shutdown, which left thousands of federal workers, including TSA officers, without paychecks for months. The pay lapse caused major delays at airports across the country, and now TSA Gold+ is being positioned as the savior, when in fact the remedy should be on Congress to do its job and not allow shutdowns to happen.

TSA has stated that federal security guidelines and standards will remain fully in force. Still, I would like to know who would be responsible for ensuring these guidelines are met, and whether these private companies will be privy to SSI?

Travelers already complain that airport security rules in the U.S. seem to vary by airport, and I can confirm that this is by design. All U.S. airports follow the same rulebook for security, but they may run different security protocols at different times, which can make them seem out of sync.

With TSA Gold+, unlike the existing Screening Partnership Program (SPP), under which 20 airports are currently, TSA will now allow the selected private contractor to use their own technology to screen passengers. To my knowledge, we don’t have historical data on this, which can create friction in the passenger screening experience.

Ultimately, I believe security will remain strong for travelers under either model; however, I worry about how sensitive information will be protected under private contractors and how dedicated potential candidates will be to upholding the security measures that the Department of Homeland Security has led since the events of 9/11.

Which, at times, I feel we have forgotten about.

I spoke with several TSA officers at TPA last week. Here’s a bit of our conversation.

What has TPA's leadership told you about this transition?

They won’t tell the TSO agents very much. It’s extremely vague answers, and it’s really messing with people’s livelihoods. TPA did so much for us during the shutdown. They brought in food, gave us free gas multiple times, and our electric companies were covering our bills. Something has changed, and there are rumors that the government is strong-arming them because of the major airside renovation.

How do you feel about TSA Gold+? Is this good for travelers?

TSA Gold+ is simply Trump gold for billionaire donors. It is not a program for passengers but rather a public-private partnership, with public money going to private businesses, in which the exact screening process is handled by private companies.

Why do you think this switch is happening?

Prior government shutdowns left screeners unpaid, which in turn led many to quit or leave for higher-paying jobs elsewhere, causing staff shortages and longer screening times. If a private business takes over, the government must pay them, which in turn would pay screeners. But at what cost to taxpayers???

So you believe it’s a get-rich play?

Politicians saw an opportunity to push privatization, enrich their billionaire friends and themselves. Thus “TSA Gold+” was born. Rather than work to create a budget that ensured payment of TSA workers, they found gold or perhaps were told to make it happen. Since the government cannot default on payments to private businesses, it must take on more debt to meet those public-private obligations, thereby avoiding government shutdowns that would force debt management.

Some estimates put the cost of TSA Gold+ to taxpayers at up to 20%.

Unfortunately for TPA officers, the switch is happening. How would you like the transition to happen?

TSA going private is a bad idea, especially for the people currently working for the federal government. One thing to resolve with this going private is that current employees should have the option to stay within the federal government until they quit or retire, and then all new employees coming into TSA will be private. This is the best way to handle the situation, rather than what they’re doing now.

TPA is loved by travelers, often receiving the best reviews out of any airport regarding TSA. Why do you think that, and could this change impact that?

Tampa TSA had one of the highest attendance rates and minimum impact during recent shutdowns. A contributing factor is that Florida attracts many individuals who have retired from careers in the military and police departments. Tampa TSA has a more skilled workforce, where many officers are former veterans and law enforcement officers.

If Tampa privatizes, many of those officers will likely retire, while many more look for comparable-paying jobs elsewhere. Left will be the need to keep air travelers safe with lower-paid, less skilled workers.

Tampa will be on a fast track from being the best to being like the ones travelers don’t like.

Share

There’s a lot to discuss here, but to put a bow on it, TSA Gold+ isn't a necessity and comes across as a gateway to capitalize on air safety. The technological advancements can be implemented within today’s model without requiring it.

The program only furthers the Trump administration's Project 2025 plan to privatize TSA. It’ll be interesting to know what companies are selected and if they have any affiliation with key decision-makers.

I believe it’s also important to highlight that TPA is gearing up for a major renovation, as mentioned above, for which the government will contribute $40 million. The total cost is over $1.5 billion, and it is set to open to the traveling public in 2029.

The comments are open to all, as I’m eager to hear your thoughts on this incredible story about the future of our air security.

Leave a comment

Read the original on gateaccess.substack.com

Comments

Nothing yet. Say the first thing.

    Sign in to join the conversation.