
Can agentic AI really do research?
And what's going to happen to us if they can't?
AI and computers, written by a CS professor. Aims to be correct, concise and accessible.
Live Last read · last published · next check

And what's going to happen to us if they can't?

Recent developments within smaller LLMs

You can’t move these days without bumping into an agentic-themed story, so here’s my quick take.

A new guide to the risks of putting LLMs into machine learning workflows

You’ve probably heard the term attention. In fact, you’ve probably heard it a lot. Since the onset of transformers, it’s pretty much all people talk about. But where did attention come from? What is it really? Whilst modulatory pathways is not a common answer to either of these questions, I think it’s one that gets to the heart of things.

A reservoir computer is essentially a big, messy dynamical system that you poke with input data and observe the ripples. Might these unconventional computing systems help us address one of the big pressing problems of AI, efficiency?

It’s a while since I last wrote a Deep Dips post, so I’m going to broach another topic in the area of deep learning and LLMs that is becoming increasingly talked about — Mechanistic Interpretability, or MI to its friends.

After decades in the doldrums, spiking neural networks are making a comeback, and could slash the energy costs of deep learning and generative AI.

Because who doesn't like to navel gaze?

Thanks AI! Now can you help us fix it?