This newsletter went quiet for a stretch. I resumed it a few weeks ago. I did so partly because I have things to say about research visibility, and partly, to be honest, to support a tool I am building (Loud Camel) that helps researchers get their work read.
Since I resumed, a few people have unsubscribed and no new readers have come in. Fair enough, that’s information. But it also means I’m writing into a slowly shrinking room, and I’d like to fix that before it gets quieter.
So here’s the ask: if anything here has been useful to you,
you forward this issue (or any past one) to one or two people who’d actually want to read it?
Here’s who I think Direction Matters is for:
Researchers — especially early-career ones — who feel their papers vanish into the void after publication.
PhD students and postdocs trying to figure out the unwritten rules of scholarly visibility, citations, and collaboration.
Independent or unaffiliated scholars who don’t have an institutional megaphone behind them.
People in research-adjacent roles — librarians, research office staff, science communicators — who think seriously about how knowledge actually travels.
Anyone curious about the sociology of science — the Mertons and Latours of the world, not just the metrics dashboards.
If someone in your circle fits that description, a forward, a DM, or a “you should read this” post. Any of it helps more than you’d think.
Thanks for reading, and thanks in advance for sharing.
— Boris

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.