How do we squeeze more output from the people we already employ?
Every new technology—from the assembly line to the personal computer—has largely been judged by one measure: productivity. Could it help workers produce more output, more quickly, and at lower cost?
Yet, at 2 o’clock this morning, I woke up wondering if we’re asking the wrong question.
Perhaps the real question isn’t:
How much more work can people do because of AI?
Perhaps it’s this:
What should organizations do with the time that AI gives back?
That may become one of the defining leadership questions of the AI era.
Imagine two companies.
Both adopt the same Agentic AI tools. Both discover that knowledge workers recover on average five hours each week.
The first company’s leadership immediately sees an opportunity.
“Excellent,” they say. “Now everyone can take on more work.”
At the second company, leadership pauses.
“What if,” they ask, “we invested some of those five hours in helping our people become better at what only humans can do?”
At first glance, those ideas sound similar.
They’re not.
Productivity measures what happened.
Capacity measures what becomes possible.
A productive employee completes today’s work.
A high-capacity employee becomes increasingly capable of solving tomorrow’s problems.
Capacity grows when people deepen their judgment, strengthen relationships, learn new skills, mentor colleagues, ask better questions, exercise discernment, and discover better ways to create value.
Every new capability makes future capabilities easier to develop.
That’s how organizations become more resilient, innovative, and adaptable.
Much of modern management traces its roots to the Industrial Revolution.
Factories sought consistency. Managers optimized workflows. Efficiency became the highest virtue.
That approach made perfect sense for repetitive work.
But knowledge work has never fit neatly into that model.
And Agentic AI is widening the gap.
The scarce resource is no longer the ability to process information.
Information has become abundant.
Judgment has become scarce.
Discernment has become scarce.
Trust has become scarce.
Creativity has become scarce.
Leadership has become scarcer still.
Those capabilities cannot simply be demanded through longer workdays or fuller calendars.
They require time to develop.
A leader produces record quarterly numbers.
The c-suite’s members applaud.
But what happened beneath those numbers?
Employees skipped vacations.
Managers carried impossible workloads.
High performers quietly updated their résumés.
Mentoring disappeared.
Learning stopped.
Innovation slowed.
Relationships frayed.
We rarely describe it that way.
We call it “driving results.”
But there is another way to see it.
Every exhausted employee, every preventable resignation, every burned-out manager represents capacity that has been spent faster than it can be replenished.
That may satisfy this quarter’s earnings report.
It rarely strengthens future opportunity.
For the first time in generations, many organizations will gain meaningful amounts of human time.
The temptation will be obvious.
Fill every available minute.
Assign another project.
Increase utilization.
Raise performance expectations once again.
Companies routinely decide what to do with financial profits.
Some distribute them immediately.
Others reinvest them to create future growth.
Why shouldn’t leaders think about reclaimed human time the same way?
Imagine using those recovered hours to coach emerging leaders.
To help employees master difficult conversations.
To encourage experimentation and iteration.
To deepen customer understanding.
To strengthen cross-functional collaboration.
To develop discernment..
People who experience stronger Work Fit are more likely to remain with an organization.
They continue learning.
They develop institutional knowledge.
They build trusted relationships.
They mentor newer colleagues.
They exercise sound judgment under pressure.
They contribute ideas because they feel connected to the work rather than trapped by it.
Not every employee will have perfect Work Fit.
No organization can satisfy every personal preference.
Nor should it.
That’s a very different conversation.
For decades we’ve measured leadership by asking one question:
How much added output did your team produce?
The Agentic AI era invites a better question.
How much more capable did your team become under your leadership?
Those aren’t the same thing.
One measures what people accomplished.
The other measures what they are becoming.
They’ll be the ones whose leaders understand that technology should expand human capability, not merely intensify human workload.
The companies that recognize the difference won’t just build more productive organizations.
They’ll build organizations whose productive capacity grows year after year because the people in their workplace thrive.
Perhaps that is the real promise of AI—not replacing human work, but creating the time and space for humans to become better at the work only they can do.
Our best days lie ahead.
Note: image in this post was rendered on ChatGPT based on our prompts.
I’m Dan Smolen. As host and executive producer of What’s Your Work Fit? I help you make your work and workplace decisions result in better and more satisfying professional experiences and outcomes. I am also a Founding Member of The Future of Work Alliance.
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.