The Center for Open Science has announced that from November 16, 2026, no new projects can be created on the Open Science Framework. After February 19 all projects will become read-only, and eventually, they anticipate that all private projects will be deleted. The OSF has raised a generation of scientists that is able to practice open science. These scientists will need to take these skills to a…
In this blog post I will analyse the arguments that Dr. Amy Cuddy provided in a LinkedIn post “The "Power Posing Was Debunked" Myth: What the Research Actually Shows — and Why Scientific Discourse Matters” on February 26. You can find the LinkedIn post here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/power-posing-debunked-myth-what-research-actually-shows-amy-cuddy-t6lnc In the post, Cuddy says she was…
Paul Simon’s says there are 50 ways to leave your lover, and a similar abundance characterizes the contemporary literature on how to analyse a replication study. The recent SCORE replication project in Nature makes this explicit by reporting “13 replication success metrics along with the number of papers to which each metric could be applied” (Tyner et al., 2026). The reason for this, as the…
With my collaborators, I am increasingly performing qualitative research. I find qualitative research projects a useful way to improve my understanding of behaviors that I want to explore with other methods in the future. For example, some years ago I performed qualitative interviews with researchers who believed their own research had no value whatsoever. Although I did not intend to publish…
Note: This humorously intended sarcastic blog post directly mimics classifications of psychological disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychological Association, but Dogmatic Bayesianism is not in the DSM-5 as an actual psychological disorder - for now. Dogmatic Bayesianism Disorder Diagnostic Criteria F61.1 A. Individuals are convinced that they know what other…
In a recent post on Bluesky, where Richard Morey reflects on a paper he published with Clintin Davis-Stober that points out concerns with the p-curve method (Morey & Davis-Stober, 2025) , he writes: Also, I think people should stop using forensic meta-analytic techniques that have not been adequately vetted by experts in statistics. The p-curve papers have very little statistical detail, and were…
Update 30/09/2025: I have added a reply by Andrew Gelman below my original blog post. We recently posted a preprint criticizing the idea of Type S and M errors ( https://osf.io/2phzb_v1 ). From our abstract: “While these concepts have been proposed to be useful both when designing a study (prospective) and when evaluating results (retroactive), we argue that these statistics do not facilitate the…
Researchers increasingly use the Open Science Framework (OSF) to share files, such as data and code underlying scientific publications, or presentations and materials for scientific workshops. The OSF is an amazing service that has contributed immensely to a changed research culture where psychologists share data, code, and materials. We are very grateful it exists. But it is not always the most…
Are meta-scientists ignoring philosophy of science (PoS)? Are they re-inventing the wheel? A recent panel at the Metascience conference engaged with this question, and the first sentence of the abstract states “Critics argue that metascience merely reinvents the wheel of other academic fields.” It’s a topic I have been thinking about for a while, so I will share my thoughts on this question. In…
It is increasingly common for researchers to preregister their studies ( Spitzer and Mueller 2023 ; Imai et al. 2025 ) . As preregistration is a new practice, it is not surprising that it is not always implemented well. One challenge is that researchers do not always indicate where they deviated from their preregistration when reporting results from preregistered studies ( Akker et al. 2024 ) .…