Reading · BEing Human · RSS Amplifier

In August 2000, a twenty-four-year-old Californian named Jeffrey Schilling was captured by Abu Sayyaf militants on Jolo Island in the Philippines. The ransom demand: $ 10 million.

Jeff’s mother could scrape together maybe ten thousand. The U.S. government wouldn’t pay a cent. And the rebel leader, Abu Sabaya, wouldn’t budge.

The FBI sent Chris Voss.

For months, Voss coached the negotiation team to do something that felt insane: stay. Don’t match the aggression. Don’t concede. Don’t leave the table. Listen so carefully that the person across from you starts to feel heard for the first time, and in that moment, forgets they’re supposed to be in control.

The negotiator Voss coached laid out everything Sabaya had said. Five hundred years of grievances. Fishing rights. Economic injustice. All of it, reflected back without judgment. Sabaya went silent.

Then two words: “That’s right.” And after that, no more demands. Nothing. The $10 million became zero in a single conversation (Voss, Never Split the Difference, 2016).

Sabaya’s organization became so disorganized that Schilling eventually escaped, and Philippine commandos moved in to extract him in April 2001. Afterward, the rebel negotiator called to say he felt respected by the process.

Here’s what Voss understood that most don’t: the loudest person in the room isn’t the strongest. They’re the most afraid. Their aggression is a reflex, not a strategy.

And you don’t have to leave the room to win.

The Number Everyone Ignores

57% of employees have quit a job because of their manager. Not the work. Not the money. Not the commute. One person (DDI, 2019). 14% have done it more than once.

Gallup found that half of all Americans have left a job specifically to get away from their boss at some point in their career (Gallup, State of the American Manager, 2015). And 52% of employees who voluntarily walked out the door said their manager or organization could have done something to prevent it (Gallup, 2020).

We talk about culture like it’s a poster on a wall. Culture is what happens when the difficult person walks into the room, and everyone goes quiet.

Organizations protect their highest performers even when those performers are destroying everyone around them. They justify it with results. Revenue. Share price. The unspoken math: one person’s brilliance is worth ten people’s misery.

Until those ten people leave. And they always leave.

The Reptile in the Room

Here’s what happens in your brain when a difficult person comes at you: the amygdala fires. Cortisol floods your system. Your prefrontal cortex, the part that reasons and empathizes, goes quiet.

Daniel Goleman called this an “amygdala hijack” (Goleman, Emotional Intelligence, 1995). The survival brain takes over. Fast. Loud. Certain.

And when we’re on the receiving end, our survival brain fires too. We freeze. We get small. We rehearse responses in our heads that we never actually say.

We leave the meeting and spend the next four hours composing the email we’ll never send.

The difficult person didn’t win because they were right. They won because biology gave them a three-second head start, and you interpreted speed as authority.

But here’s the thing about survival reactions. They burn out. Fast. If you don’t match the energy, if you stay in the conversation with real arguments and a steady voice, the other person has to switch from reflex to reason.

And most of them can’t.

They’re not struggling because they’re strong. They’re struggling because you stayed.

The CEO Who Stopped Flinching

I coach a CEO of a global luxury hospitality company. Hundreds of properties. Operations across four continents. He splits his time between Europe and the U.S. and hasn’t slept in the same city two weeks in a row for years.

When he took over, the organization was a mess. He rebuilt 70% of his leadership team. Brought in people he believed in. Built something real.

But there’s this one executive.

Brilliant at results. Terrible with humans. The kind of person who turns a strategy meeting into a courtroom. His financial instincts have driven the company’s valuation to heights nobody expected. Everyone on the leadership team loves what his work does for the share price.

Yet nobody wants to be in a room with him.

They avoid him. They won’t challenge him. They route decisions around him like water finding its way around a rock. And every time they do, they hand him more power.

Here’s what makes this CEO different: he didn’t learn how to handle this person from the corner office. He learned it as a peer.

Before he was CEO, they sat at the same table. Same rank. Same standing. And the first time they met, the executive came at him. This decision is bad. We need to do that instead. The full performance. Loud certainty. Zero curiosity.

The CEO didn’t flinch. He didn’t match the energy. He gave the guy background. Walked him through the reasoning. Explained why. And something shifted. The exec listened. And at the end, he supported it.

Not because he was told to. Because he was given real arguments by someone who refused to shrink.

“I’ve had a few confrontations,” the CEO told me. “But you need to be ready to confront him. The first answers are always reptile reactions. Aggressive. Certain. Dismissive. But if you stay in the debate and come with real arguments, he starts to struggle.”

Then he said the line I can’t stop thinking about:

“You’re not struggling. He’s struggling.”

Now, as CEO, he’s trying to teach his team the same thing. But here’s the gap: his team sees the hierarchy. They see a powerful executive and assume the rules are different. They think you need authority to hold your ground.

He had none when he figured this out. He was an equal who chose not to flinch. That’s it.

He told his team: “If you have the patience and the guts, it works.”

Because knowing the difficult person is beatable and actually standing in front of them are two very different things.

“Management is a human venture. It’s not about the share price. That’s just an outcome.”

That line has stayed with me. Because it names the thing most organizations won’t say out loud: results don’t excuse the damage.

They deserve language.

What to Say

This isn’t therapy. This is language you can use in a meeting, in a hallway, or on a call. When the difficult person does the thing they always do, and your survival brain says flee, try these instead:

“Help me understand what you’re seeing.” This isn’t soft. It forces them to articulate instead of attack. Most difficult people are reacting to a story in their head, not to what’s actually happening. Make them say the story out loud. It usually falls apart.
“I hear you. And I disagree.” Six words. No escalation. No apology. You acknowledged them. You held your ground. Most people never get past the first sentence. The “and” is everything.
“I’m not going to respond to that tone, but I will respond to the question.” You just separated the behavior from the content. You gave them a door. Whether they walk through it is on them.
“That’s one way to see it. Here’s another.” Not combative. Not dismissive. You’re not asking permission to have a perspective. You’re simply offering one.
“Let’s stay on the problem.” The difficult person’s superpower is making the conversation about them. This sentence puts the conversation back where it belongs. Say it as many times as you need to.

These aren’t comebacks. They’re not clever. They work because they do the one thing the difficult person isn’t expecting: they keep you in the room without giving up who you are.

The Room You’re Already In

This isn’t just about work. The difficult person might be a board member. Or a client. Or a brother-in-law. A friend. Or the parent who still talks to you like you’re fifteen. Or the ex who texts in a tone designed to make you spiral.

The physics are the same. They push. You freeze. They interpret your silence as agreement. And the cycle continues.

But Chris Voss didn’t leave the table in the Philippines. The CEO I coach didn’t leave the boardroom. He didn’t even have a title to hide behind when he figured it out. He was a peer who chose to stay and argue with real arguments.

And you don’t have to leave whatever room you’re in right now.

The difficult person’s power is not their intelligence, their volume, or their track record. Their power is your willingness to believe you can’t handle them.

You can.

Stay in the conversation. Come with real arguments. Let their first reaction burn itself out. And when they start to struggle, don’t rescue them.

You’re not crazy. They’re just terrible.

And that was never yours to fix.

Stay human,
-Bryan

P.S. Still in the room with your difficult person? I can help. Book a call or reply, and let’s get you sorted. :-)

You're Not Crazy. They're Just Terrible.

Comments