You’re throwing around “MVP” like it’s a magic bullet, but it’s probably sinking your project. You launched, ran tests, collected data, and survived the stakeholder demos. Yet weeks later, you’re stuck asking: Do users even want this? Did we pick the right audience? Can we scale it? You find yourself Stuck in an endless loop again, iterating on what was a slam-dunk MVP. Resulting in another monstrosity that is pure pain!
If you’re wading through this fog, it’s because you’ve missed the fundamental purpose of an MVP and you failed to nail down the MVP’s purpose from the start. It’s not just a “first stab”—it’s a strategic tool to apply based on what you want to achieve: Solving a known problem or exploring a new possibility. Most teams don’t know to ask this question and it’s leading to a mess of wasted effort and vague results. Get this distinction right, and you’ll cut through the noise to build something that actually moves the needle.
Why This Matters
The term “MVP” gets slapped on anything remotely unfinished, but that’s where the trouble starts. An MVP isn’t a catch-all for “rough draft—It’s a deliberate lean experiment to gauge if you're on the right path. The trick is knowing in which direction you're setting your sails. At the core if it, you're really only wanting to know: Are we trying to solve a known and clear problem users are already shouting about OR are we testing something new that's not necessarily been asked for, something innovative and we're trying to gauge whether there's any traction? Misunderstanding this distinction is why your MVPs keep falling flat.
Introducing the MVP Archetypes:
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.