It may seem like a very stupid question.
Do depraved individuals and groups cause massive unnecessary suffering, death, fear, abuse through greed, deceit, hubris, megalomania, lack of compassion, elitism, supremacism, pseudoscience, pseudoreligion, arrogance, lack of imagination / thought, cultism, sublimation of conscience to “following the rules”?
Well of course!
You would have to be blind to deny that.
I am very happy with the word evil as used in the phrase “the evils of the world”. I just take issue about what it actually means when we say that.
I worry because it is easy to attach their very dangerous purely pink chequer-board dualism on top of the facts, a virtual reality overlay that is taken for reality. It’s the ultimate supremacist tool. Even animals are not seen as evil. The evil ones are lower than animals. Nothing done to them is without justification.
The last 6 years has revealed to anyone with a curious, sceptical brain the extent of the horrors.
The endemic systematic child-trafficking and worse makes obscenity fests like Marquis de Sade’s 120 days of Sodom look mild.
But whoever causes one of these little ones
who has faith
to sin,
it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
I would agree wholeheartedly with this.
Not as “punishment”. Just a simple observation. You’d be better off missing the concert rather than playing it on bad acid. Not an attempt to trivialise the horror but to clarify what I think Jesus was getting across. You will suffer for your actions. Consequences. You do not know what you have done - though you think you do - and have justifications for it. You are operating half asleep in the grip of a terrible madness. You are far from natural reality and you will pay for this.
For me Faith is a lack of graven images (certainties) - a submission to the natural, to reality, God’s creation if that term doesn’t offend you.
The state of awe, trust in mum, dad, other people, playfulness, ability to enjoy fantasy games whilst remaining absolutely rooted in peaceful reality is the natural state of a baby.
It is a very fucked-up world where a baby is taught early on to abandon these in the face of highly dysfunctional circumstances - before their Faith is established.
I’ve removed the last terrible verse. I don’t trust the poet at all but there’s truth here.
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another’s throats.
Disappointments and abuse come thick and fast from parents and society - always a question of how fucked-up - and in what way - parents are FU - not if. This applies to myself as parent in no small measure. I would do it all again from scratch if I could.
For one thing I understand just how expertly these divisions and catastrophes have been guided.
The fear comes from all quarters. Parents, news, friends, acquaintances, billboards, films, books, poems
(the above poem with its doom and gloom nihilistic ending promoting a fear of having children is a fine example - 2 verses to draw you in with insight and shock and then one final verse to push the eugenics agenda. That’s why I didn’t give him the courtesy of mentioning his name.)
Fear is nearly always imaginary. Sometimes a man has a knife or is makes you feel uncomfortable - or a tiger is in the kitchen - then fear is a useful indicator and fight or flight needs chemicals pumping round the body.
But - even in these cases - it’s the extent to which you master your fear that determines whether you survive. Once the present danger is understood fear plays no useful role.
Fear is the mind-slayer.
And when the fear is of something that may happen in the distant future, or of something in someone’s story, or our own then it really serves no purpose. Awareness and focus does not require fear.
You don’t fear the calloused person unless you believe you may catch something.
In every instance, we can see fear as being rooted in some certain belief - some story treated as true. In my terms some pink stuff being treated as reality.
To separate truth from stories is the whole of it
for without delusion fear cannot take
and so love must flower
Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven
This obviously doesn’t mean you blindly trust strangers. It means returning to the natural state we had, the uncarved-block, the face we had before our parents were born, our original face.
Full of love, awe, joy, playfulness, compassion, as well as the sharp-eyed observation and understanding of the world that comes from encounters with it. No desire to control anyone else. No thought of it!
As Escape Key would say,
basically, without fear.
Most people close off to some degree. They become cautious restrained, controlled, defensive (and attack is the best form of defence yeah?). They carry it in their physical armour. They build defences and defend possessions, see the need for control of the chaos to extend to control of others - sometimes to an all-consuming degree.
Some however “seem like they are still young!”
Verily I say unto you, Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven
These people are not operating from fear, but from love.
They have Faith.
I can’t go a whole essay without mentioning it, but in this case, it really is central.
Germ Theory, if believed, is a constant drip of ever present fear that something out there may get you - without remorse or personal feelings - it may strike you down - a physical equivalent of evil in many ways.
Five years since I understood the hard facts on the ground and I have not been ill since. I used to regularly get all sorts of flus, colds, stomach upsets, rashes…
The toxins and biological shocks haven’t gone away. All that has changed is the psychology.
When the fear of nature goes, you will be surprised what a massive difference it makes.
Sadly so. There are some extremely FU people.
I do not see any advantage in labelling them as evil personally. And I think it completely obscures what is going on - and makes it harder to move away from the horrors.
Don’t give me genetics, or born under a bad sign.
What caused a cooing baby to end up like that?
How can I look at the least of them and still see I AM, Christ?
These obscene, eugenicist, entitled, depopulationist control freaks?
Answer: with great difficulty
BUT anything else is delusion.
As far as I am aware nobody has successfully isolated evil yet either.
What if it is a useless notion that propagates itself ? Against evil all things are good. Right?
You may think I’m obscene myself in suggesting that seeing another as plain evil is inadvertently as supremacist as we can get.
But we must not forget that every tyranny in history - including this one - declared how strongly and in what way it was fighting evil.
And essential part of committing atrocities is the total dehumanisation of the people involved.
My thesis is that the people committing the evils - are fucked up and not evil. I maintain that there is no advantage whatsoever to outsourcing their brokenness, failures, savagery, lack of compassion and psychopathy to an abstract dualistic chequer-board notion.
We need to understand what they are and how and why. We need to understand their Bacon-inspired Crowley-publicised Bailey-sold UN adopted Gnostic religion - with its astroturf New Age movement,
The Global New Atlantis Realised is helped along by us in many ways.
And believing in their black and white chequerboard is a central one I feel.
The perpetrator is a - usually systematically - mangled little-boy or girl. They will face consequences.
But only if we keep our heads.
These are just my thoughts but that is what Substack is for (….. i know… i know…..)
Response to others is a way of clarifying one’s own thoughts. I would be very interested in hearing comments on this question I was asked and my response.
Dear Tim,
over and over again I come up against the image of two “lesser” individuals, Mr. Gates and Bourla, Schwab et al and wondering if they are fully human and how I can have compassion and forgiveness for them. And of course, many others of that clan. Going back into history is helpful but it gets a little murky after a while.
Any suggestions?
My tuppeny-worth…
Well there are significantly more fucked-up people even than those two. That is indeed the hardest question. This is my attempt at an answer.
I guess I would ask you to consider a kind father who went to university and who over-ruled his wife’s wishes and made his children have vaccines.
He was misled. Groomed into believing in this stuff.
He is not evil - too trusting gullible and compliant - groomed to be those things too.
Imagine a 6000 year juggernaut of the Gnostic belief that the God of this world is the devil, the world is a prison, the aim is to escape to the true God. That building the New Atlantis is the ONLY thing worth considering. That most people are useless meandering thick selfish animals who need herding, culling, controlling by those suited to do so.
A lifetime of grooming by psychopathic parents who were similarly groomed.
Mix all that up with greed (insecurity)
It is not always easy to hate the sin and love the sinner. I do not achieve this. Consequences are the way people learn and there’s no harm in people receiving come back and attacks for their actions.
Whitewashing the dysfunctional behaviour in the name of wishy-wishy loving everyone is just as bad.
Tough love!!
I am not saying I would not enjoy locking both those two up for ever - or that I would shed a tear or pass a judgement if others felt a more secure way of removing them was warranted.
You can ignore reality but you can’t ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
We should indeed be God’s hands and form part of the consequences for these dangerous, damaging, damaged arrogant pricks. But that is fraught with danger! Lest we become like them! The danger in fighting The Despiser is that we take his place.
I don’t know if you saw the episode of Doctor Who where he was holding bombs ready to kill off all the Daleks at the very beginning of their genesis?
He couldn’t do it. He said if you were taken back in time to see the baby Hitler, and had a chance to kill it before it grew up. Would you have taken that chance?
No. Because the baby was innocent. What happened after created the control freak.
Anyone who feels the need to control others is a scared little-boy or girl wearing a thick coat.
People are bullied, cajoled, punished, ignored, love-starved, bribed, manipulated and tricked into forgetting that everything they do to anyone - even those they consider the least of all people - they do to I AM - Christ God - themselves.
In Melanie Klein’s work she shows the splitting babies do of the ideal object - the good breast and the enemy - the bad breast. Schizophrenia as a coping mechanism for anxiety.
When the baby understands one day that the thing it has attacked and hated the most is the thing it cherishes most a new coping strategy emerges - depression / guilt.
What will these types feel when they face the question?
And if we are wise, this same thought may come to us as we feel the hate for these (just being factual) fucking elitist bastards.
What I am positing is that we left Eden because we swallowed the “knowledge of good and evil”.
I think that’s a clue.
Warm wishes
Tim
Do support if you can 🙏
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.