You cannot rate-hike a monsoon

The RBI held the repo at 5.25% last week and kept a neutral stance. Unanimous. The headline take was “cautious hold.” Read the minutes backwards, notes first, and they tell a different story.

Inflation is projected to climb to 5.9% in Q3 before it moderates. It rose to 4.4% in June, the first print above target after sixteen straight months below it. And core inflation, the part that actually reflects demand, sat at 3.9%. Benign. The entire increase came from food and fuel.

That is not an overheating economy. That is a weather report.

Here is what should bother you. The whole conversation around that meeting was about the rate. Will they cut in October, will the monsoon behave, is 5.9% the peak. Twenty-five basis points of oxygen, sucked out of the room. Meanwhile the thing actually moving prices sits entirely outside the reach of the instrument everyone was debating.

You cannot raise rates to fix an erratic south-west monsoon. You cannot tighten liquidity to unclog a mandi or drop the price of imported crude. The tool does not touch the disease.

This is the Indian pattern, and almost nobody names it. India reaches for demand-side tools to solve supply-side problems. Its inflation is a supply story. Its growth ceiling is a supply story. And the framework it uses to manage both was imported wholesale from economies that had a genuinely different disease.

Let me make the case, then test it against the rest of the world, because that is where it either holds up or falls apart.

Register Now

Food is close to half of India’s CPI basket. When onion prices triple after a bad harvest, the index screams, and it has nothing to do with anyone earning or spending too much. The 2011 to 2013 episode was the clean case: double-digit CPI alongside slowing growth and a currency under siege. That is not the signature of excess demand. That is supply failing while the RBI raised rates into the teeth of it.

Core inflation at 3.9% today tells you demand is contained. The number the market frets over, the 5.9% projected peak, is food and fuel. A weather-and-geopolitics number wearing a monetary-policy costume.

India’s constraint has never been that Indians will not spend. It is that the plumbing cannot carry the throughput. Logistics that cost more than they should. Power that is not reliable enough. Land you cannot assemble, contracts you cannot enforce quickly, factor markets that seize up. Female labour-force participation that leaves half the potential workforce on the bench.

1991 was not a demand stimulus. It was a supply-side liberation: dismantle the licence raj, remove the constraint, let capacity form. Every reform since that actually moved the needle has been supply-side. GST. The bankruptcy code. The road and port buildout. The capex push. None of it is glamorous. All of it is the actual story.

So why does the conversation keep orbiting the rate? Because in 2016 India adopted flexible inflation targeting: a 4% target with a band, written into the RBI Act. It is a demand-side instrument, and it did real work. It anchored expectations after the 2013 mess. Credit where due.

But an instrument built to manage demand becomes the lens through which every problem gets seen. Give a central bank an inflation target and a policy rate, and every question starts to look like a rate question, even when the answer is a warehouse, a port, or a functioning agri supply chain.

Where the thesis holds, decisively: every economy that caught up did it on the supply side. South Korea. Taiwan. Japan. Then China. Not one of them consumed its way to the frontier. They built capacity, human capital, infrastructure, and export muscle. Development, historically, is a supply-side event. China is the model India openly chases, and China’s rise was the largest supply-side buildout in history.

Where it breaks, and this is the honest part: the West’s recent inflation was genuinely demand-led. The 2021 to 2023 surge in the US came from fiscal transfers, pent-up savings, and a labour market that ran hot, layered on top of real supply shocks. When the Fed raised rates hard, it was treating an actual demand disease. The playbook fit the patient.

India borrowed that playbook without the disease. It runs a framework designed for demand overheating in an economy whose inflation is a monsoon and whose growth is capped by supply. That is the miscalibration. Not that demand management is useless. That India keeps treating the demand dial as the main event when the main event is the supply chain behind it.

And here is the twist the China parallel hands you for free. China built supply so hard that it now has the opposite problem: deflation and deficient demand. Supply eventually outran demand. That is a real lesson about sequencing. But notice whose lesson it is. A country that already won the supply-side war. India has not fought it yet.

The counter you will hear is that India does have a demand problem, and there is truth in it. Post-COVID consumption is K-shaped, mass-market demand is soft, the bottom half is not spending. But look closely at what that is. It is demand deficiency, not demand excess. Even India’s demand problem argues against the tightening reflex, not for it.

Which lands the whole thing here. India rarely has too much demand. It has too little supply, and sometimes too little demand on top. In neither case is the answer another quarter spent parsing the rate.

Supply-side reform is slow. It does not fit a quarterly MPC cycle. It gives no press conference, no dovish-versus-hawkish scoreboard, no clean 25bps headline. So it gets chronically underweighted in the conversation while the country litigates a rate that, this cycle, is a spectator to its own inflation print.

Read the August minutes one more time. Core at 3.9%. Everything else, food and fuel. The RBI, in its own careful language, is telling you the demand side is behaving. The problem is on the other side of the ledger, the side that takes a decade of unglamorous building and never trends on the day the decision drops.

You cannot rate-hike a monsoon. You have to build the country that no longer depends on one.

P.S. This is the throug-hline of the next Growth Titans session: where the supply-side buildout actually shows up in listed companies, the picks and shovels of the capacity India still has to construct.

Register Now