My MP - how wrong can you be in one reply.

A quick post about a recent e-mail exchange with my MP.

Frightening how wrong she can be in one response isn’t it?

My initial e-mail to her letting her know what I told her predecessor:

Now that the UK Government, of which you are an integral part, has signed the WHO’s new treaty amendments AND allowed the Online Safety Act to become active I thought I would send you part of some correspondence I had with your predecessor William Cash.

It is part of a discussion on vaccines, especially the “covid” vaccines, the WHO’s amendments and my prediction for how things will develop.

Here is a very plausible scenario you and your fellow MPs, who are there to act in the best interests of their constituents and not the political party they represent, should be aware of and be working to stop and ensure it can never happen in this country:

Step 1 - the current Human Rights legislation is repealed

Step 2 - the Bill of Rights is enacted with the “common good” clause included

Step 3 - the Online Harms Boll is passed as is which remove s the right to post online dissenting opinions that are not agreeing with the “agreed narrative”.

Step 4 - the WHO pandemic Treaty is signed as they want by 2024 which gives the WHO worldwide control over any future “pandemics" and national Governments who are signatory to the treaty can only follow the WHO’s orders - an organisation run by a known Communist who is being investigated for/wanted for genocide by the ICC

Step 5 - WHO declare a “pandemic”

Step 6 - WHO declare all countries must lockdown and give all of their population a new and unproven vaccine against whatever caused the pandemic

Step 7 - enforced lockdowns, testing and so on in the UK similar to what the 25 million people who are under lockdown currently in Shanghai are under “for the common good” - that phrase again. Not seen the current situation on Shanghai in the MSM have you?

Step 8 - WHO says mandatory vaccines and so on required regardless of what the Secretary of State at the moment believes or thinks or his superiors want

Think it’s far fetched? Pure paranoia? Fantasy?

How am I doing so far with my prediction? I think quite well.

Step 1 - isn’t pulling out of the ECHR being discussed at the moment?

Step 2 - can see something like that happening due to the current debates about protecting yourself, family and property going on and that will replace the current ECHR legislation

Step 3 - Bill was passed and being used now

Step 4 - done last week

Step 5 onwards - can see it happening after Operation Pegasus later this year copying late 2019 and Event 201

All the correspondence is available if you want it all, just ask. You may find it interesting as your predecessor and the then Vaccine minister Maggie Throup showed how unknowledgeable and ignorant they were on the subject.

So are you in favour of repealing the Online Safety Act and introducing a Digital Bill of Rights like this:

https://togetherdeclaration.org/draft-digital-bill-of-rights

Plus as a minimum withdraw from the WHO’s new treaty amendments but the best option is to follow the lead of the USA, Italy and Argentina and withdraw from the WHO completely.

Today I got this reply:

Thank you for your email. I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns, and I want to address some of the points you have raised.

The UK has not given the World Health Organization any powers to override our national sovereignty. The recent amendments to the International Health Regulations strengthen global cooperation on health emergencies but do not give the WHO authority to impose lockdowns, mandate vaccines, or dictate laws in the UK. Any decisions on public health measures remain entirely with the UK Government and Parliament.

The Online Safety Act is designed to protect people – particularly children – from illegal content, fraud, and harmful material online. It does not ban lawful free speech or prevent legitimate political debate, but it does ensure that online platforms take responsibility for removing content that is illegal or poses a genuine risk of harm.

On vaccines, all COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the UK underwent rigorous independent assessment for safety, quality, and effectiveness. They have saved countless lives, reduced hospitalisations, and remain an important tool in protecting public health.

While I respect your right to your own views, I do not agree with the suggestion that these developments are part of a plan to remove individual freedoms. I will continue to support measures that keep people safe while protecting the democratic rights we all value.

So I’ve sent off a rebuttal:

“Thank you for your reply but there are some major factual errors in it.

To wit:

The UK has not given the World Health Organization any powers to override our national sovereignty.

Can you please explain what this means: "What is unambiguous about this statement: "The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.””

All I can I suggest to you is to read the treaty in full.

but it does ensure that online platforms take responsibility for removing content that is illegal or poses a genuine risk of harm.

I suggest you research how many legitimate sites etc, including MPs, are being censored since the Online Harms Act became law. Also this is a direct quote received from the UK Government direct to me in 2022:

"Therefore, while the bill will require platforms to tackle criminal activity, it does not require the removal of harmful content accessed by adults."

Where does it say that content is to be censored or removed by the social media companies etc?

And finally I really do not know how to answer this piece of either gross ignorance or stupidity. It is just parroting and copy and pasted without any research into actual facts isn’t it?

On vaccines, all COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the UK underwent rigorous independent assessment for safety, quality, and effectiveness. They have saved countless lives, reduced hospitalisations, and remain an important tool in protecting public health.

I suggest that you employ decent researchers who can find, within seconds, sufficient evidence that not only are the “covid” vaccines NOT safe NOR effective they have directly contributed to the deaths and disablement of hundreds of millions of people worldwide.

If you would like me to supply evidence and documentation to support any of the above just get in touch and ask. If your researchers cannot find it for you I would sack them immediately.

One last thing, all I ask is that when the WHO start the next pandemic scare and demands countries start locking down, enforcing vaccine mandates and the UK Government slavishly goes along with it then I would like an apology from you.

If I am wrong and another scamdemic never happens then I apologise in advance for scaremongering.

I truly hope this is the case as the world wakes up to what an evil, insidious organisation the UN is and with special regard to the WHO and it’s on-going power grab. The USA has woken up to it with Trump as President and Kennedy as HHS.

This country needs leaders like those 2 not sycophant, uninspiring, untrustworthy bootlickers who just follow orders that make up Government and the Houses of Parliament and the House of Lords we have had for many years but especially now.”

Wonder what answer, if any, I get back.