Markets Are Wrong - Here’s the War That Could Prove It

Why the US/Iran conflict could be the black swan event that reshapes your portfolio

Everyone around you is saying this will be quick — like Venezuela. The markets are betting on it too. But what if they're catastrophically wrong?
Veteran market analyst Michael Markowski argues that a prolonged US/Iran conflict has not been priced into markets at all. Here's why that matters — and why it should change how you think about your portfolio.

Iran Is Not Venezuela

Iran has 91.6 million people, a GDP of $475 billion, and is the 17th largest land mass in the world — the size of Alaska, mountainous and deeply resilient. Comparing it to Venezuela (28 million people, $82.8 billion GDP) is absurd.
Robert Pape at the University of Chicago — who advised every White House from 2001–2024 and spent three years teaching targeting strategy for the US Air Force — has studied every air campaign since WWI. His conclusion: air wars for regime change have never worked. Not once in over 100 years.

A War Without a Clear Purpose

There was no clear provocation. There is no defined objective. Pentagon officials are already questioning the strategy, concerned about depleting US munitions stockpiles for a conflict with no end in sight. With strikes hitting hospitals, schools, and civilian areas — over a thousand civilian casualties — the question of when the US declares "victory" remains entirely unanswered.

The Macro Backdrop Is Already Fracturing

The war doesn't exist in a vacuum. Simultaneously:
Jobs: Payrolls at -92,000 vs. an estimate of +55,000
Goldman flow of funds: Worst levels since March 1928
South Korea's KOSPI: Biggest one-day crash on record — BofA calls it a "textbook bubble" comparable to 2008
Treasuries: US allies and adversaries alike are selling, rotating into gold
Private credit: Jamie Dimon and Boaz Weinstein are both flagging pre-2008 parallels in unregulated lending

The AI Mirage

35% of the S&P 500 is concentrated in the Magnificent Seven — companies growing revenue at 5–10% but priced for 50–100% growth. They're spending billions on AI capex not because the economics work, but to retain talent and appease shareholders.
Berkshire Hathaway sees it clearly. They're sitting on $354 billion in cash while their own stock dips.

What This Means for You

When the war drags on, when emerging market currencies keep falling, when private credit unravels — the divergence becomes unsustainable. This is the moment to think seriously about portfolio reallocation. Not in panic, but with clarity.

Inspired by Michael Markowski's analysis on LinkedIn, March 12, 2026. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Follow more on Michael Markowski here - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/usirans-long-war-priced-michael-markowski-1vjre/

Join us at Artemis Miami Tech Week:
Palm Beach - Designing the Next Decade of Blue Innovation
Miami F1 - WEB3 AI Tech Investor Gathering