Dual View Random Solved Random Open
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
For $r\geq 2$ let $h(r)$ be the maximal finite $k$ such that there exists a basis $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ of order $r$ (so every large integer is the sum of at most $r$ integers from $A$) and exact order $k$ (so every large integer is the sum of exactly $k$ integers from $A$).

Find the value of\[\lim_r \frac{h(r)}{r^2}.\]
A simple example of the order of a basis differing from the exact order is given by $A=\cup_{k\geq 0}(2^{2k},2^{2k+1}]$, which has order $2$ but exact order $3$.

Erdős and Graham [ErGr80b] have shown that a basis $A$ has an exact order if and only if $a_2-a_1,a_3-a_2,a_4-a_3,\ldots$ are coprime. They also proved that\[\frac{1}{4}\leq \lim_r \frac{h(r)}{r^2}\leq \frac{5}{4}.\]The best bounds known for the limit are\[\frac{1}{3}\leq \lim_r \frac{h(r)}{r^2}\leq \frac{1}{2},\]the lower bound originally due to Grekos [Gr88] and the upper bound to Nash [Na93]. Improved bounds in the lower order terms were given by Plagne [Pl04].

Erdős and Graham [ErGr80b] showed $h(2)=4$. Nash [Na93] showed $h(3)=7$. The value of $h(4)$ is unknown, but it is known [Pl04] that $10\leq h(4)\leq 11$.
Additional thanks to: Zach Hunter and Wouter van Doorn
Proof expositions (0)
If you would like to contribute an exposition of a proof related to this problem, please message a moderator or leave your exposition as a comment.

No proof expositions yet.
Comments (1) Proof claims (1)
More information and links
This page was last edited 28 October 2025. (View history) (View the LaTeX source)

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #336, https://www.erdosproblems.com/336, accessed 2026-09-02

From the external database. (You can help update this.)
Formalised statement? No (create one)
OEIS Possible
Reactions
Likes None
Open to collaboration None
Currently working on None
Looks difficult None
Looks tractable zach_hunter
Could be formalisable None
Working on formalising None