Dual View Random Solved Random Open
OPEN This is open, and cannot be resolved with a finite computation.
Let $k\geq 3$ and $f(k)$ be the supremum of $\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}$ as $A$ ranges over all sets of positive integers which do not contain a $k$-term arithmetic progression. Estimate $f(k)$.

Is\[\lim_{k\to \infty}\frac{f(k)}{\log W(k)}=\infty\]where $W(k)$ is the van der Waerden number?
Berlekamp [Be68] proved $f(k) \geq \frac{\log 2}{2}k$. Gerver [Ge77] proved\[f(k) \geq (1-o(1))k\log k.\]It is trivial that\[\frac{f(k)}{\log W(k)}\geq \frac{1}{2},\]but improving the right-hand side to any constant $>1/2$ is open.

Gerver also proved (see the comments for an alternative argument of Tao) that [3] is equivalent to $f(k)$ being finite for all $k$.

The current record for $f(3)$ is $f(3)\geq 3.00849$, due to Wróblewski [Wr84]. Walker [Wa25] proved $f(4)\geq 4.43975$.

Walker [Wa25] has shown that it suffices to consider Kempner sets (that is, sets of integers defined as all those whose base $b$ digits are contained in some $S\subset \{0,\ldots,b-1\}$ for fixed $b$ and $S$), in the sense that for any $k\geq 3$ and $\epsilon>0$ there is a Kempner set $A$ lacking $k$-term arithmetic progressions such that\[\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}\geq f(k)-\epsilon.\]In [Er80] Erdős asks whether for every $\epsilon>0$ and $k\geq 3$ if $A$ is a set of integers without a $k$-term arithmetic progression such that $\min(A)$ is sufficiently large in terms of $\epsilon$ and $k$ then $\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n}<\epsilon$.
Proof expositions (0)
If you would like to contribute an exposition of a proof related to this problem, please message a moderator or leave your exposition as a comment.

No proof expositions yet.
Comments (7) Proof claims (0)
More information and links
This page was last edited 04 April 2026. (View history) (View the LaTeX source)

When referring to this problem, please use the original sources of Erdős. If you wish to acknowledge this website, the recommended citation format is:

T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #169, https://www.erdosproblems.com/169, accessed 2026-09-01

From the external database. (You can help update this.)
Formalised statement? No (create one)
OEIS A005346
Reactions
Likes Dogmachine
Open to collaboration None
Currently working on None
Looks difficult None
Looks tractable None
Could be formalisable None
Working on formalising None