This evening I was on a wonderful call about websites where, at two points, I reached for books that were around me as a visual reference. One of the books was âMini Louvreâ, a gift given to me that contains images and information about various artworks in the Louvre. We ended up talking about how there should be more picture books for adults, something I raised after sharing my excitement about the Mini Louvre book. This led me further to think about my use of Mini Louvre in the last week.
I was looking for inspiration for a blog post and I decided to flick through the Mini Louvre book. I didnât go in with any aim in particular, rather I wanted to skim the pages and see what I could find. I do this sometimes with poetry books too. The way I decided on the poem âRepeat that, repeatâ for the collaborative challenge I did with Ruben was that I opened some of my poetry books, flicked through, and chose one that was short and seemed approachable in terms of analysis. I loved the practice of flicking through the book and seeing what stood out, almost as if I was wandering aimlessly through a world of poetry â and, in the case of Mini Louvre, of imagery and art history.
This has me thinking about what a âreferenceâ book means. I have thought for the longest time of reference books as being more text-heavy, and more technical. Dictionaries, style guides, compilations of quotations, domain-specific references, and more all fit into this. But for me, poetry anthologies have been useful for reference, and, further, inspiration. So too was Mini Louvre; my perusing didnât lead to any particular work, but it did give me a moment with art where I noticed something that was relevant to an idea I had. In a way, I was doing research without really realising it. Today I realised that visual books can be reference books too.
I am wondering whether I should add a few more art books to my shelf for when I want to flick through and see different images. I find the web a bit overwhelming for this purpose, both in terms of imagery and poetry; there are so many things to look through, and it is so easy to scroll. Whereas in a book I can open the work at a random page, look at what I see, and sit with it without feeling the pressure of having to keep going as I do when I am perusing an online image gallery.
I have three books about art that arenât textbooks: a book of Monetâs work, Mini Louvre, and a book made for the Art of Manga exhibition that the de Young Museum in San Francisco held. For the latter book, I didnât go to the exhibition but it looked so cool that I knew I wanted to have a physical artefact I could read. The print quality is delightful, and I have greatly enjoyed looking through and reading it. The book hasn't inspired me in a specific way, but it did satisfy my curiosity, and I love that it is there on my shelf whenever I want to learn a bit more about manga design.
Earlier this week, I was looking through an art magazine I had lying around, and a particular work of art in a photograph in an advert stood out to me. My interest in the piece took me down a rabbit hole that led to me learning about an art collection I didnât know about, and was quite a fun adventure. I loved how flicking through a magazine led to something of an adventure.
I have been thinking too how it would be nice to have more zines also for creative reference. I would love to make zines and think it would be helpful to see how more people do them, just as I surf the web and explore websites to see how other people are using the medium of the web. I have a few handwritten zines in my collection which I love but I am also curious if there are zines of typewriters, or zines that are all images, or zines that are collages.
I am curious: do you collect any physical artefacts â books, zines, maps, exhibition guides, or whatever is relevant to you â for future creative reference? If so, I would love to hear your stories! Feel free to email me with your thoughts.