Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantized state systems method
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge selectively to Quantization (signal processing). I see limited, if any, support for retention, but no consensus for deletion, making the proposed ATD sensible. If the merge isn't carried out within one month, feel free to WP:BLAR the page, after which merging may continue from the page's history. Owen× ☎ 12:02, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Quantized state systems method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research math citing only primary sources, created by an apparent author of the sources. --Altenmann >talk 15:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. I am in two minds about this page. It clearly needs some editing to meet current standards, for instance the two unused sources tacked on at the end, and some peacock/weasel terms. The possible COI is also discouraging, but since the page has been around for 13 years the COI does not appear to be a valid reason to delete. The original paper has ~150 cites in Google Scholar, and some of those are secondary. This case is very marginal, particularly as I do not feel that the nom has made a good case for deletion based upon policy arguments.Ldm1954 (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- The policies: WP:PROMO, WP:NOTADVERT. --Altenmann >talk 15:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 03:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 01:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC) - Merge with quantization (signal processing). Promotional material can be fixed with cleanup, and WP:OR can be pruned. But also there’s just two inline sources that are both self-published. I don’t really feel like the article fits WP:GNG. It would fit better with my merge target article and some heavy cleanup. Brynn Who Likes Editing (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.