Jump to content

Victorian fashion

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Illustration depicting fashions throughout the 19th century

Victorian fashion consists of the various fashions and trends in clothing in British culture that emerged and developed in the United Kingdom and the British Empire throughout the Victorian era, roughly from the 1830s through 1900. The period saw many changes in fashion, including changes in styles, fashion technology and methods of distribution. Various movements in architecture, literature, and the decorative and visual arts as well as a changing perception of gender roles also influenced fashion.

During Queen Victoria's reign, England enjoyed a period of economic and political growth along with technological advancement. Mass production of sewing machines for home use in the 1850s as well as the advent of synthetic dyes introduced major changes in fashion.[1] Clothing could be made more quickly and cheaply. Benefitting from the Industrial Revolution,[1] fashion changed more frequently, with more fundamental differences than it had in prior centuries. The styles of Elizabethan England, in contrast, changed much less extremely over the course of a century.

Advancement in literacy and printing and the proliferation of fashion magazines opened the evolving trends of high fashion and the markets of advertising and mass consumption to the middle and working classes. By 1905, clothing was increasingly factory made and often sold in large, fixed-price department stores, spurring an age of consumerism with the rising middle classes.

Women's fashions

During the Victorian Era, middle-class women were said to inhabit the private, domestic sphere.[2] The "'ideology of separate spheres' (or 'domestic ideology') ... dictated that respectable middle-class women were domestic creatures,"[3]:92 (of 741) or "the angel in the house" (from Coventry Patmore's poem). The clothing choices women made were affected by social class and the prevailing ideologies and values of their class.[4] For example, the location of middle-class women in the domestic sphere influenced their sense of fashion and of what was appropriate to wear. The boundary between the working class and the middle class was porous for upper-working-class women, especially those with more education,[3]:91 (of 741) which means that the "ideology of separate spheres" affected them and made the middle-class value of respectability important for them as well.

The largest social class was the working classes (about 3/4 of the population in 1760[3]:26 (of 741)), and almost all "working-class women earned money, whether in agricultural work, factories, service, domestic industry, or the new white-collar and service jobs, and their work was an important contribution to their families’ well-being or even survival."[3]:86 (of 741) All of this work was in public, and the women's clothing reflected the work they did, whether the uniform of a servant, the practical dress of a laborer or the accessories helping to identify what they were selling.

Restricted by the "ideology of separate spheres" as they were, middle-class women also did both paid and unpaid work outside their homes. Lower-middle-class women did (often) unpaid work in the family business, making

varied and crucial contributions to family businesses and incomes. ... In addition, [more affluent] middle-class women worked, some occasionally or sporadically, others extensively and tirelessly, in and through religious or philanthropic organizations at a wide range of valued activities."[3]:94 (of 741)

The middle classes grew during the course of the century. At the beginning they were only about "one quarter of the population by 1850, [but] between 1851 and 1871 the number of solidly middle-class families doubled."[3]:91 (of 741) By the middle of the century, middle-class women — much of whose work occurred in the public sphere — were likely to be making their own dresses, following perhaps the fashions of haute couture but bounded by the need to appear respectable.

The women in what David Cannadine calls "the British landed establishment,"[5]:xxii the ruling class, about 1–5% of the population,[3]:167 (of 741) lived their lives in public unless they personally chose to be more private and domestic. Besides serving on boards and running philanthropic organizations, they were the leaders of the social world, essential for the political work of not only their own interests but those of their husbands and other male relatives. Some wore haute couture, some were very active in sports and took advantage of clothing (and foundations) designed with more freedom of movement in mind and some went their own way and developed their own style.

Regardless of class, most women wore a corset over a chemise, followed by a gown or skirt paired with a bodice, blouse, or chemisette. The shape of the skirt would be supported by layers of petticoats or, later in the period, structured support such as cage crinolines or bustles. The clothing of upper-class women, who generally did not do paid labor, was often elaborately decorated with more layers and trims. Middle-class women wore less complex dress styles with less expensive fabric and trim. Working-class clothing was simpler still, with less expensive fabric, fewer layers and little trim, and sometimes signaled the work they did. Including the undergarments, the amount of fabric in women's clothing made it much heavier and the construction made it much more restrictive than ours, especially in the waist (due to the boning in the corset) and the shoulders (due to the popularity of dropped shoulder seams). The amount, quality and type of fabric were displays of wealth and status.

Throughout the 19th century, journalism increasingly targeted women and addressed an increasingly more class-diverse audience. According to the Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism,

The closely allied fashion and women's journals can be divided into three phases: titles such as the Lady's Magazine continued eighteenth-century models, addressing readers as "ladies" and catering to a leisured, fashionable elite; a more domesticated format by the 1840s, targeting middle-class women with instructive and entertaining content including dressmaking and etiquette articles ...; finally, from the 1870s, a livelier, more engaging style of fashion reporting influenced by the New Journalism was integrated with an increased amount of imagery, including better quality fashion plates ....[6]

By the end of the century, women's periodicals were including patterns for dressmaking in their pages, reflecting the presence of middle- and working-class readers as well as technological change like sewing machines for home use and mass-produced fabrics and trim.

Old illustration of a century of styles
Print depicting 19th-century fashions

Elements of Victorian Fashion

It is important not to oversimplify the fashion of the Victorian age. The rate of change in fashion accelerated in the 19th century to the point that styles were distinctly different from one decade to the next (see the print called "When Was That Dress in Fashion?", right). The styles of Elizabethan England, in contrast, changed much less extremely over the course of a century.

The most important elements for the analysis of 19th-century fashion include silhouette or line, foundation garments like corsets or stays, the neckline and the sleeves. The silhouette in particular but also the color, the variety of available fabrics and the distribution of information and opinion about fashion were the result of technological changes made throughout the century, but centering in the 1850s.

Silhouette: Silhouette changed over time supported by the evolution of the foundation garments. In fact the line or silhouette of garments changed about every ten years. Just as outer clothing changed, foundation garments were also modified to give the wearer a different silhouette. Over the course of the century most Europeans (and many in the colonies) wore the same kinds of undergarments and similar outer garments. For example, wide skirts were supported by layers of petticoats that used woven horsehair to stiffen them.[7] By 1856 the cage crinoline (a domed structure using steel bands and wires) replaced the petticoats, making the skirts lighter in weight and easier to walk in. The line of the outer garments was influenced by how full the skirt was, how small the waist was and its location relative to the natural waistline, how the sleeves were shaped, and how deep the neckline went.

This dress features a low waistline, and the bodice is worn over the hips to further emphasise the silhouette
An undressed woman In 1837, featuring a fashionable hairstyle, busked corset, and layers of petticoats.

Corsets: Corsets or stays were ubiquitous, providing adjustable bust and posture support, helping to shape the body into the fashionable silhouette and preventing horizontal creasing in the bodice. Over the course of the century, almost all women and some men wore corsets. After the late 1850s, an individual could lace a corset without help.[8]:30–31 Most corsets were constructed with a busk "(a flat length of whalebone, wood or steel) inserted in a channel down the centre to smooth out the front of the dress."[8]:13 The drawing of the 1837 woman (right) shows a self-laced corset with what may be a split busk.

Neckline: Necklines changed over the course of the century as bodices and sleeves evolved. The less formal daywear had a higher neckline, regardless of class and decade. For formal wear, which varied widely by class and kind of event, the neckline was often lower and off the shoulder and finished with a bertha (lace collar or flounce) or multiple bands of fabric pleats. This décolleté evening style popularized shawls or capelets and required a corset without shoulder straps. The fashion was for dressmakers to produce two bodices with each skirt, one closed décolletage for day and one décolleté for evening.

Engageants

Sleeves: Over the course of the century, styles in sleeves changed radically and more than one sleeve style was fashionable at the same time. Some of the most popular styles included gigot, pagoda, engageants (see below right), bishop and leg-of-mutton sleeves. The changes were in the armscye, the wrist treatment, and the fullness at the shoulder, elbow and wrist. For example, as crinolines began to appear in the 1850s, sleeves were shaped like large bells known as pagoda sleeves. Engageantes, or false sleeves, were stitched inside full or open sleeves like pagoda sleeves and were made of light fabrics like lace, linen, lawn or cambric. They were easy to remove, launder and restitch into position.

Even though the changes in fashion over the century were sometimes rapid and extreme, they were also evolutionary.

1830s dress style

English day dress, c. 1838, with bow details and puffed sleeves.
Old painting of a teenage girl in a white dress with a dog
Princess Victoria and her dog Dash

During the beginning of Queen Victoria's reign in 1837, the fashionable silhouette was an hourglass shape with wide shoulders, emphasized by puffed gigot sleeves, a full skirt, and a slim waist.

Corsets were extended over the abdomen and down towards the hips, and worn with a busk.[9]:23 A chemise was worn under the corset, and cut relatively low in the neck so that it could not be seen. Over the corset was the tight-fitting bodice featuring a high, straight waistline. Under the ankle-length skirt were layers of petticoats[10]:23 stiffened with horsehair. (Skirts would not be extremely full for another two decades.) To contrast with the narrow waist, necklines were low and wide. Queen Victoria's 1833 white dress (right) shows an off-the-shoulder neckline, a higher waist and an ankle-length skirt held out by horsehair. The c. 1836 yellow day dress (left) shows gigot sleeves, a higher neckline and a skirt held out by petticoats.

Always a mark of wealth and status, the white dress that Princess Victoria is wearing shows that she is formally dressed, perhaps for court, although the pose itself suggests some informality as well.

1840s dress style

The 1840s saw an increase in domestic magazines targeting women, along with new varieties in the weave of ready-made fabrics as well as new and much more vibrant colors because of the invention of aniline dyes. Cotton replaced silk as a basic fabric, especially among middle-class women, because silk was expensive, limiting who could afford it. The elements of fashion changed rapidly during this transitional decade.

1844 fashion plate depicting fashionable clothing for men and women

At the beginning of the 1840s, skirts began to widen and become dome shaped (because the skirt pieces changed from rectangles to gores, which are wider at the bottom). The waistline lowered with a point formed at the bottom of both the bodice and corset, which gave a rather rigid look to the silhouette. During this decade, the amount of trim decreased in general, although it was still plentiful. In addition to the flowers, feathers, and ribbons many of the decorations on the dress were made of the fabric of the dress (tucks and pleats, flounces, ruffles). At the end of the decade, waists rose to the natural waistline.

English silk day dress, 2nd half of the 1840s, with dropped shoulder seams, tight sleeves and a pointed waist.

Although corsets narrowed the bodices and gave them a point in the early 1840s, by the end of the decade, they returned to the natural waistline. Corsets lost their straps by the end of the decade. Busks in the front of the corset were split by Jean Julien Josselin in 1829,[11]:30 but the corset was not reliable at staying closed until 1848 when Joseph Cooper patented the "slot and stud" closure, which is still in use today.[11]:30

Necklines remained wide with further use of lace berthas to frame the upper body. At the end of the decade, necklines were raised and remained high.

Dresses were stiffer due to boning in the bodice as well as the corset. Skirts lengthened, while in 1847 widths increased with the introduction of the horsehair crinoline, a petticoat stiffened with horsehair and starch. Skirts often had one or two flounces at the bottom that increased the look of fullness (see, for example, the 1844 fashion plate, right). The petticoats were numerous and became bulky and heavy and sometimes entangled the feet. Petticoats had another disadvantage: the number of waistbands increased with each additional petticoat.

To achieve the narrow waist, skirts were attached to bodices using very tight organ pleats "secured at every other fold."[12]:32

Sleeves narrowed with smaller decorative additions (see, for example, the English silk day dress, left). They eventually widened at the wrists into open pagoda-type sleeves requiring engageants to cover the forearms.

Shawls were used to convert a simple dress into a more formal ensemble. The popularity of shawls grew because of the very soft and beautifully dyed and woven cashmere shawls from India with a paisley design (named after the Scottish town that manufactured shawls).[13]:14 Head coverings were de regueur, dominated by poke bonnets.[13]:15–16 (The mannequin in the English silk day dress, above left, is wearing a poke bonnet.) Cosmetics became more popular, with instructions for those without knowledgeable lady's maids printed in the Handbook of the Toilette, widely available beginning in 1839. Unfortunately some beauty products contained toxic elements like the calcium oxide (or quicklime) found in hair dye, which was recommended to be left in the hair for 3 to 8 hours.[13]:17

By the end of the 1840s skirts were more dome shaped, necklines were higher and wider and sleeves broadened at the bottom.

1850s dress style

The 1850s saw revolutionary changes in technologies affecting the manufacture and consumption of clothing, especially

  • the mass production of fabrics
  • the invention of synthetic dyes
  • the manufacture of inexpensive, flexible and lightweight steel
  • the invention of a sewing machine that could be used in the home
  • the spread of fashion journalism and journalism for women

According to the Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism, "The 1850s and 1860s saw the eclipse of the older ladies' journals [that began in the 18th century and targeted upper-class women] and the emergence of the magazine for middle-class ... women."[14]:684 Nine fashion magazines were being published in London by 1850 and fourteen by 1859 as part of the burgeoning collection of magazines for women, both domestic magazines aimed at middle-class women and journalism focused mostly on fashion.[15]:24 The journalism aimed at middle-class women introduced haute couture, making the styles, names of couturiers and fashion houses familiar to them for the first time.

These technological changes were revolutionary because of the impact they had on fashion over the course of the rest of the century. Their impact on fashion arises largely because most women were taught a wide range of seamstress skills and, due to reforms in education over the century, more women could read, so they used their skills and literacies to have more agency over what they wore.

A day ensemble ca. 1855, featuring tiers of ruffles and pagoda style sleeves.

Silhouette

The 1850s are considered a transitional decade in 19th-century fashion because little changed in the silhouette and appearance of clothing, but technological changes would make increasingly important structural differences in what was available for people to wear.

Skirts widened with the disappearance of the many layers of petticoats but did not change their basic dome shape. Beyond the silhouette, the design elements of the dress (like sleeves, neckline, or skirt) were barely changed as they evolved from the 1840s to the 1860s.

While the silhouette and elements of design did not change significantly, the effect of the technological changes related to the manufacture and consumption of clothing was to give individual (and especially middle-class women) more agency over how their dresses got made and who made them, what fabrics their dresses were made of, how broad a range of options they could choose from and how easy it was to move in their dresses.

The number of flounces and ruffles on the skirt increased, making the skirt look wider (see the c. 1855 day ensemble, right).

Neckline

1850s evening dress with a bertha

With trim and a front closure in the corset and the bodice, the bodice emphasized a distinct V-shape. Necklines of day dresses were sometimes cut into a V-shape, causing a need to cover the bust area with a chemisette. For evening, a wide, low neckline was popular, often with a bertha (see the 1850s even dress with a bertha, left).[16]

Sleeves

Pagoda sleeves and under sleeves (engageants) continued to be popular for most of the decade.

Foundations

1st patented cage crinoline.Fullness of the skirt is even further emphasised.
1850s fashionable silhouette and the cage crinoline needed to support it.

In 1856, the invention of the first cage crinoline allowed for wider skirts than petticoats could. The cage crinoline was constructed by joining thin metal strips together with wires to form a circular cage-like structure that could support a very wide skirt (see 1950s silhouette and cage crinoline, right). Although often ridiculed by journalists and cartoonists of the time as the crinoline swelled in size, this innovation freed women from the heavy weight of petticoats.[17] Technological advancement made cage crinolines possible. Not visible on the outside garment, the cage crinoline was the foundation for the huge dome-shaped skirts that dominated the decade. It was safer and easier to walk in a cage because the hoops held the skirt away from the feet and legs of the wearer.

Without the innumerable petticoats more women began to wear drawers or "pantalettes" for modesty and warmth. The dome shape made possible by the cage foundation changed the way skirts were cut. Instead of rectangles, gores were cut with one end of the skirt piece wider than the other end,[18] preventing bulkiness at the waist from gathered fabric and created a skirt bottom much wider than the top. Pantalettes had no seam between the legs; the crotch of the garment was simply left open.

Bloomers, designed by American Amelia Jenks Bloomer, introduced bifurcated garments for women, essentially trousers or pants with a seam between the legs. This experiment failed, and most women didn’t wear pants until the 20th century, but we know that some women were prepared if an accident with their cage exposed them. For example, Louise, Duchess of Manchester (later Duchess of Devonshire) must have been wearing a cage like this in 1859 when one of her hoops caught in a stile she was crossing and she fell. She landed "on her feet with her cage and whole petticoats remaining above her head," revealing "to all the world in general and the Duc de Malakoff in particular" that she was wearing "a pair of scarlet tartan knickerbockers," the kind of garment men would wear when hunting.[19] ()

The 1850s saw two other developments that permanently changed the clothing available to Victorian women (and men). Created in 1856, the first synthetic dyes were much more vivid and vibrant than natural dyes and resisted fading.[20]:42–43 Because Victorian photography was black and white, we do not typically see the gaudy and saturated colours that many Victorians loved.[21] Also, although sewing machines had already been invented, changing the accessibility and value of individual articles of clothing, it was the invention of and widespread sale of a "lightweight domestic machine" for home sewing that affected large numbers of women.[20]:41–42

Cage crinolines remained popular for perhaps 5 years among the fashion forward and perhaps 10 years for the less adventurous.

An English silk morning dress

1860s dress style

English dress in 1864, showcasing bishop sleeves and simple trim.

Foundations

The cage crenoline reached their greatest width during the 1860s. Photographs show that the fashion-forward Empress Eugénie of France, Empress Elisabeth of Austria and Countess Pauline von Metternich had stopped wearing the very large crinoline cages as early as 1862, but most middle- and upper-class women (including Queen Victoria) wore them for much of the rest of the decade.

During the first half of the 1860s, crinolines began decreasing in size at the top, while retaining their volume at the bottom, creating a more pyramidal shape.[22]:26 Then the fullness began to move to the back while the front became flat and close to the body. As the back fullness increased, skirts sometimes lengthened into trains. (The 1865 English silk dress, above right, shows the flattening of the front at the waist and the development of the train.) In order to emphasize the back, the train was gathered together to form soft folds and draperies.[23] This line or silhouette would eventually evolve into a bustle in the next decade.

Decoration or trim often appeared only at the bottom of the skirt (see English dress, 1864, below right). Flounces and ruffles diminished as geometric designs in trim gained popularity.[24]:49 Skirts were also decorated with overskirts of the same fabric or a different shade of the same color. Waistlines were pointed in front below the natural waistline. By mid-century the waist was seated at the natural waistline often with a wide belt and large decorative buckle.

Bodices and Sleeves

Bodices often had buttons down the front because both the corset and the bodice opened in the front. Necklines were generally high and rounded. Some dresses were cut without separating the bodice and skirt so it could be buttoned from the neck to the bottom of the skirt. It became popular for dresses to be made as one skirt and two bodices, one for day wear and one for formal wear.[25]:43

Sleeves narrowed but remained loose on the arms and were wrist length. Sometimes the sleeves were full at the shoulder, but they were not very puffed.

A greater and richer variety of fabrics was available to the always upwardly-aspirational middle class, with silk essential in the dress of wealthy middle- and upper-class women. Dresses were cut and pieced together to accommodate the more active life women had in sports, walking and even riding bicycles. The trends that began in the 1860s continued through the 1870s and into the 1880s; the changes were evolutionary.

1870s dress style

Silhouette

A black net ball dress, 1874

In 1877, dresses moulded to fit the figure, as increasingly slimmer and more restrictive silhouettes were favored. Although dress styles took on a more natural form, corsetry was still required and the now de regueur train was often supported with a bustle cage.[26]:50 The armscye, for the first time in the Victorian period, moved from a dropped position up to the shoulders and would remain there for the rest of the era.

The most famous designer of this conservative, very fitted and restrictive style was British-born Frederick Worth, who designed the “princess” construction for dresses, which we still use today, and who popularized and then “killed,” according to his obituary in The Lady’s Treasury,[27] the crinoline cage. The princess construction was named for Alexandra, Princess of Wales, who preferred a lean, tailored style. By 1879 corsets were being built using "princess" seams to support the tailoring of the smooth, straight dresses like the ones designed by Maison Worth.

Because Queen Victoria had been in mourning since 1861, the Princess Alexandra was expected to lead in the haute couture of the day. She set a trend for tailored dresses that was quickly picked up by all classes. Unlike the tailored designs, what Maison Worth created was ornate with many decorative elements, including fringe, which was widely used (along with ribbon, braid, ball fringe, ruching, epaulettes, pieces of the same fabric in a lighter or darker shade, pieces of a different-textured fabric like velvet or velveteen, etc.).

No single silhouette dominated the 1870s, however, because of the different lines created by the bustle, the overskirt and the layers of the polonaise, or a combination of these three skirt treatments. Foundation garments changed very little, although perhaps the greatest change came in corsets. In 1870 women were wearing corsets that came to just below the waist with a pointed center front.

Skirts

An c. 1875 English polonaise

The trend for wide skirts slowly disappeared during the 1870s, as women started to prefer a slimmer silhouette. Skirts went from their most extreme width to their most narrow, waists went to a natural level and the backside took the point of interest in the ensemble. The back of the dress became the focal point of the design. The relationship between the various skirt treatments was very complex, in part because skirts became architectural. (The bustle on the 1874 black net ball dress, above right, has been gathered and bunched and would require padding to keep the draping in place. It also has an overskirt.)

The skirt began the decade rather flat in front with most of the fabric pulled to the back and pleated. As the skirt evolved, the gathered fabric draped gracefully at the back. In the next fashion the extra fabric was bunched into large poufs below the waist in back. Then a pad supported the extra fabric, and then by the end of the decade a tournure or bustle kept the elaborate draping of the back of the skirt and train in place. In general, trains were present on every dress, including day dresses, but they were narrower and longer with tiers and drapes. Petticoats, which could be washed separately, kept the longer trains off the ground.

Overskirts became extremely popular, often tied up into an apron effect at the front with a polonaise or puffed draperies at the back.[28] A revival of an 18th-century romanticization of what a milkmaid might have worn, the 1870s polonaise is a garment featuring both an overskirt and bodice often of the same fabric (see c. 1875 English polonaise, left). Over time, the overskirt shortened into a detached basque, resulting in an elongation of the bodice over the hips. (The early 1870s fashion plate, below right, shows an assortment of ways overskirts were worn, including one for a girl.)

Dresses featuring the Bustle & Polonaise
An early 1870s fashion plate

Neckline

Necklines were high, and lines were sleek and fitted.

Sleeves

Pagoda sleeves began to lose their three-decade-long popularity in 1875,[29]:48–49 but most sleeve treatments were narrow and came to the wrist.

An unusual trend occurred during the 1870s in hairstyles, which grew very large with added braids, buns, coils, poufs and strands. The elaborate hairstyles required multiple hair pieces and featured tiny, over-decorated hats fastened almost vertically on the head. Although women had already been supplementing their own hair, these extremely large styles caused enormous demand in the human hair market.[29]:59–60

The practice of constructing a dress with one skirt and two bodices (one for day and one for evening wear) continued from the 1860s.

1880s dress style

After a period of slim, train-less skirts with heavy decoration, an exaggerated horizontal bustle made a re-appearance in 1883. Due to the additional fullness, drapery moved towards the sides or front panel of the skirt instead. Bodices shortened, now ending above the hips. Skirts were much less full than the last time the bustle was in fashion in the 1870s and instead focused on a slim front with a shelf-like back protrusion.

The 1880s also saw the growing popularity of austere, menswear-inspired tailoring like that preferred by Alexandra, Princess of Wales.[30] The style was not without its critics because its fit did not seem feminine.[31]:84–85 Some credited the change in silhouette to the various Victorian dress reform movements, which arose from several sectors of society over the second half of the century. The Artistic Dress movement founded in the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and the Rational Dress movement of the mid-to-late Victorian era advocated for a natural silhouette, natural dyes and natural fibers, rejecting the traditional foundation garments of corset and cage (both crinoline and bustle). The Rational Dress movement saw women "handicapped" and their health injured by "tightly laced corsets, cumbersome dress improvers [padding], and unwieldy crinolettes [small cages]."[32]:69–70

Competing with the tailored look was a more traditional, highly feminized look dominated by a large protruding, almost horizontal bustle. This look was heavily decorated and formed a sharp contrast with the simpler, fitted silhouette, the first time in haute couture that "No single style reigned supreme."[32]:62

Old painting of a lot of people in an art gallery
Frith, A Private View, 1883

The Aesthetic Dress movement of the end of the century, led in part by Oscar Wilde and parodied by William Powell Frith's 1883 A Private View at the Royal Academy, 1881 (right) saw traditional dress as impeding women's agency. Frith's painting (right) opposed the aesthetic movement to traditional dress, targeting Wilde and his followers.

These movements were never mainstream enough to garner widespread support, but a less austere, less restrictive version of the tailored look, based perhaps on riding habits, supported those involved in other sports, like cycling and tennis.[33] If the bodice was made like a jacket, it was tailored for the individual woman. Some women who wore the tailored look, like the Princess of Wales and Empress Elisabeth of Austria, were accentuating their very thin figures, but for many the semi-masculine look was simply a fashionable style and indicated neither advanced views nor the need for practical clothes.[30]

Horizontal protrusion at the back.
Lobster-tail bustle, c. 1885.

Silhouette

Two silhouettes dominated this decade, a menswear-inspired, fitted line and a heavily decorated, complex line inspired by the first bustle period of the 1870s. The bustles of the second period in the 1880s were different from the evolving bustles of the 1870s. The 1880s bustle was large, extending sharply and horizontally from the backside, and sported a train, even for day wear. Two distinctly different lines competing for dominance in the same era is extremely unusual.

For both looks, the dresses were very fitted, with narrow sleeves, a tight bodice and a straight skirt, but the bustle style was overdecorated, and the tailored style was sometimes austere but sometimes specifically designed to be easier to move in.

The massive hair pieces of the late 1870s gave way to a simple chignon at the base of the neck that later moved to the top of the head.

Beyond the dress reform movements, the 1880s had no significant inventions or events that impacted the fashion or clothing industries.

Foundation

Both silhouettes demanded a corset that had smooth lines and that went below the waist, often one with princess seams. Presumably, the version of the tailored look that was easer to move in had a less restrictive corset or a corset laced less restrictively. The traditional dresses had narrow, decorative bustles that “were more pronounced, projecting sharply outwards” and that had trains attached to the bustle rather than the skirt itself.[31]:84 They looked like a highly decorated shelf coming out of the backside. In fact, the new bustles were a separate garment (see an example of a separate garment tied to the waist, above, right).

English evening dress with a V-shaped neckline, higher shoulder placement and simple trims, 1887

Dresses

Some of the tailored dresses were in one piece, buttoning down the front from neckline to hemline with no excess fabric for decorations. More masculinized versions had jackets, vests or waistcoats and even neckties. Some of the tailored dresses had overskirts and separate bodices. The fitted bodices of traditional dresses and the skirts that were straight down in front and on the sides as well as having bustles and trains could make even normal walking difficult.

In the traditional style, the bodice looked more like a suit jacket with a high neckline and a white blouse with a ruffled collar or some kind of feminine neck treatment. Sleeves tightened again during the 1880s and the armscye moved back up the shoulders.[34] Necklines became higher again, with a high collar being ubiquitous for daytime, a trend that would continue into the 1890s. For the evening, the bertha fell out of favor, replaced by V-shaped necklines or draped styles due to the new higher shoulder (V-shaped neckline, right).[35] Near the end of the decade sleeves developed more fullness at the shoulder.

1890s dress style

Silhouette

By 1890, the crinoline and bustle were completely left behind, and skirts flared in an A-line. If bustles were the focal point of the ensemble in the 1880s, then sleeves were the focal point in the 1890s. Menswear influences like necktie-inspired neckwear continued from the previous decade. The two silhouettes of the 1880s marked the abandonment of a single, dominant look, and subsequent periods offered many more choices for women.

Much of the excess trim of the tradititonal style of the 1880s disappeared in the 1890s, and dresses had a softer, less restrictive look. Although they closely fitted the body, dresses were not tight, allowing more freedom of movement. Many more women were participating in sports and other physical activities that required a less structured fit.

The new century would let go of boned foundation garments altogether and shorten skirts radically and bring even more unprecedented changes to feminine attire.

English socialite Lady Beatrice Pole-Carew with puffed sleeves, mid-1890s

Foundations

Larger busts were more fashionable, leading to a variety of different kinds of padding to place in the corset and make the bust look bigger. Corsets continued to reach well beyond the waist, smoothing the front of the dress.

Skirts

Bustles were left behind in the 1880s and skirts, cut in gores, were smooth, fitted close to the waist and hips until they flared outward. Away from the knees, the gores widened the skirts into an A-line.  

Necklines and Sleeves

Daywear dresses had very high necks with a kind of Mandarin collar or military band of fabric around the neck. A large brooch could be worn on such a collar.

At the beginning of the 1890s a small puff of fullness was seen at the shoulders but increased in size in the middle of the decade to a puffed leg-of-mutton style.[36]:107 From the elbow to the wrist or onto the hand, sleeves were tight fitting. By 1896 sleeves grew to a volume rivaling the 1830s from the natural shoulder line to the elbow and even sometimes required stuffing or padding to retain their fullness (see portrait of Lady Beatrice Pole-Carew, right). By 1900 the entire sleeve was "straight and narrow again."[36]:107 Even though leg-of-mutton sleeves lasted only a few years (beginning to shrink the spring season after their peak in 1896[37]:75) we associate the 1890s with them, perhaps because they are so distinctive.

Hats and headwear

Emma Hill by Ford Madox Brown (1853), a woman wearing a later version of the poke bonnet
Perched bonnet style of the early 1870s.

Hats were crucial to a respectable appearance for both men and women. To go bareheaded was simply not proper. The top hat, for example, was standard formal wear for upper- and middle-class men.[38] According to Blanche Payne, "The high top hat, usually black or dark gray, had reacched its characteristic shape by 1798 and dominated the entire nineteenth century."[39] (457–58)

For women, the styles of hats changed over time and were designed to match their outfits.

During the early Victorian decades, hats were modest in size and design, straw and fabric bonnets being the popular choice. Poke bonnets, which had been worn during the late Regency period, had high, small crowns and brims that grew larger until the 1830s, when the face of a woman wearing a poke bonnet could only be seen directly from the front. They had rounded brims, echoing the rounded form of the bell-shaped hoop skirts.

Bonnets shrunk at the end of the 1860s and moved to a perched position in the early 1870s as hairstyles grew in scale and intricacy. This led to the popularization of hats, which became the headwear of choice for the remainder of the Victorian era.[40]

Flower pot style hat of 1885.

The 1880s saw a hat inspired by the top hat for women known as the flowerpot hat, and the 1890s saw the popularity of the boater. The hats of the late Victorian era were covered with elaborate creations of silk flowers, ribbons, and above all, exotic plumes; hats sometimes included entire exotic birds that had been stuffed. Many of these plumes came from birds in the Florida everglades, which were nearly made entirely extinct by overhunting. By 1899, early environmentalists like Adeline Knapp were engaged in efforts to curtail the hunting for plumes. By 1900, more than five million birds a year were being slaughtered, and nearly 95 per cent of Florida's shore birds had been killed by plume hunters.[41]

Shoes

The women's shoes of the early Victorian period were narrow and heelless, in black or white satin. By 1850s and 1860s, they were slightly broader with a low heel and made of leather or cloth. Ankle-length laced or buttoned boots were also popular. From the 1870s to the twentieth century, heels grew higher and toes more pointed. Low-cut pumps were worn for the evening.[38]

Men's fashion

Drawing of Victorian men 1870s

During the 1840s, men wore tight-fitting, calf length frock coats and a waistcoat or vest. Sleeves were full at the top and waists were tight, creating an hourglass form. Waistcoats were single- or double-breasted, with shawl or notched collars, and might be finished in double points at the lowered waist. For more formal occasions, a cutaway morning coat was worn with light trousers during the daytime, and a dark tail coat and trousers was worn in the evening. Shirts were made of linen or cotton with low collars, occasionally turned down, and were worn with wide cravats or neck ties. Trousers had fly fronts, and breeches were used for formal functions and when horseback riding. Men wore top hats, with wide brims in sunny weather.

During the 1850s, men started wearing shirts with high upstanding or turnover collars and four-in-hand neckties tied in a bow, or tied in a knot with the pointed ends sticking out like "wings". The upper-class continued to wear top hats, and bowler hats were worn by the working class.

In the 1860s, men started wearing wider neckties that were tied in a bow or looped into a loose knot and fastened with a stickpin. Frock coats were shortened to knee-length and were worn for business, while the mid-thigh length sack coat slowly displaced the frock coat for less-formal occasions, with the overall effect of a looser silhouette. Top hats briefly became the very tall "stovepipe" shape, but a variety of other hat shapes were popular.

During the 1870s, three-piece suits grew in popularity along with patterned fabrics for shirts. Neckties were the four-in-hand and, later, the Ascot ties. A narrow ribbon tie was an alternative for tropical climates, especially in the Americas. Both frock coats and sack coats became shorter and more form fitting. Flat straw boaters were worn when boating.

During the 1880s, formal evening dress remained a dark tail coat and trousers with a dark waistcoat, a white bow tie, and a shirt with a winged collar. In mid-decade, the dinner jacket or tuxedo, was used in more relaxed formal occasions. The Norfolk jacket and tweed or woolen breeches were used for rugged outdoor pursuits such as shooting. Knee-length topcoats, often with contrasting velvet or fur collars, and calf-length overcoats were worn in winter. Men's shoes had higher heels and a narrow toe.

Starting from the 1890s, the blazer was introduced, and was worn for sports, sailing, and other casual activities.[42]

Throughout much of the Victorian era most men wore fairly short hair. This was often accompanied by various forms of facial hair including moustaches, side-burns, and full beards. A clean-shaven face did not come back into fashion until the end of the 1880s and early 1890s.[43]

Distinguishing what men really wore from what was marketed to them in periodicals and advertisements is difficult, as reliable records do not exist.[44]

Mourning black

Victoria's five daughters (Alice, Helena, Beatrice, Victoria and Louise), photographed wearing mourning black beneath a bust of their late father, Prince Albert (1862)
Black Victorian mourning dress
Mourning Dress, 1894–95

In Britain, black is the colour traditionally associated with mourning for the dead. The customs and etiquette expected of men, and especially women, were rigid during much of the Victorian era. The expectations depended on a complex hierarchy of close or distant relationship with the deceased. The closer the relationship, the longer the mourning period and the wearing of black. The wearing of full black was known as First Mourning, which had its own expected attire, including fabrics, and an expected duration of 4 to 18 months. Following the initial period of First Mourning, the mourner would progress to Second Mourning, a transition period of wearing less black, which was followed by Ordinary Mourning, and then Half-mourning. Some of these stages of mourning were shortened or skipped completely if the mourner's relationship to the deceased was more distant. Half-mourning was a transition period when black was replaced by acceptable colours such as lavender and mauve, possibly considered acceptable transition colours because of the tradition of Church of England (and Catholic) clergy wearing lavender or mauve stoles for funeral services, to represent the Passion of Christ.[45]

The mourning dress on the right was worn by Queen Victoria, "it shows the traditional touches of mourning attire, which she wore from the death of her husband, Prince Albert (1819–1861), until her own death."[46]

Norms for mourning

Manners and Rules of Good Society, or, Solecisms to be Avoided (London, Frederick Warne & Co., 1887) gives clear instructions, such as the following:[47]

Relationship to deceasedFirst mourningSecond mourningOrdinary mourningHalf-mourning
Wife for husband1-year, 1-month; bombazine fabric covered with crepe; widow's cap, lawn cuffs, collars6 months: less crepe6 months: no crepe, silk or wool replaces bombazine; in last 3 months jet jewellery and ribbons can be added6 months: colours permitted are grey, lavender, mauve, and black-and-grey
Daughter for parent6 months: black with black or white crepe (for young girls); no linen cuffs and collars; no jewellery for first 2 months4 months: less crepe2 months as above
Wife for husband's parents18 months in black bombazine with crepe3 months in black3 months as above
Parent for son- or daughter-in-law's parent– Black armband in representation of someone lost1-month black
Second wife for parent of a first wife3 months black

The complexity of these etiquette rules extends to specific mourning periods and attire for siblings, step-parents, aunts and uncles distinguished by blood and by marriage, nieces, nephews, first and second cousins, children, infants, and "connections" (who were entitled to ordinary mourning for a period of "1–3 weeks, depending on level of intimacy"). Men were expected to wear mourning black to a lesser extent than women, and for a shorter mourning period. After the mid-19th century, men would wear a black hatband and black suit, but for only half the prescribed period of mourning expected of women. Widowers were expected to mourn for a mere three months, whereas the proper mourning period expected for widows was up to four years.[48] Women who mourned in black for longer periods were accorded great respect in public for their devotion to the departed, the most prominent example being Queen Victoria herself.

Women with lesser financial means tried to keep up with the example being set by the middle and upper classes by dyeing their daily dress. Dyers made most of their income during the Victorian period by dyeing clothes black for mourning.[49]

Technological advancement

Technological advancements not only influenced the economy but brought a major change in the fashion styles worn by men and women. As the Victorian era was based on the principles of gender, race and class.[50] Much advancement was in favor of the upper class as they were the ones who could afford the latest technology and change their fashion styles accordingly. In 1830s there was introduction of horse hair crinoline that became a symbol of status and wealth as only the upper-class women could wear it. In 1850s there were more fashion technological advancements hence 1850s could rightly be called a revolution in the Victorian fashion industry such as the innovation of artificial cage crinoline that gave women an artificial hourglass silhouette without layers of petticoats, which was lighter and more hygienic.[51] Synthetic dyes, such as mauveine (aniline purple), were introduced in 1856, adding bright colours to garments. In 1855's Haute couture was introduced as tailoring became more mainstream in years to follow.[52]

Charles Frederick Worth, a prominent English designer, became popular amongst the upper class though its city of destiny always is Paris. Haute couture became popular at the same time that sewing machines were invented.[53] Princess Eugenie of France wore the Englishman dressmaker, Charles Frederick Worth's couture and he instantly became famous in France though he had just arrived in Paris a few years ago. In 1855, Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Britain welcomed Napoleon III and Eugenie of France to a full state visit to England. Eugenie was considered a fashion icon in France. Queen Victoria, who had been the fashion icon for European high fashion, was inspired by Eugenie's style and the fashions she wore.[citation needed] Later, Queen Victoria also appointed Charles Frederick Worth as her dress maker and he became a prominent designer amongst the European upper class. Charles Frederick Worth is known as the father of the haute couture as later the concept of labels were also invented in the late 19th century as custom, made to fit tailoring became mainstream.[54]

By the 1860s, when made-to-fit tailoring was popular in Europe, crinolines were considered impractical. In the 1870s, women preferred more slimmer silhouettes, hence bodices grew longer and the polonaise, a skirt and bodice made together, was introduced. In 1870s the Cuirass Bodice, a piece of armour that covers the torso and functions like a corset, was invented. Towards the end of Victoria's reign, dresses were flared naturally as crinolines were rejected by middle-class women. Designers such as Charles Frederick Worth were also against them. All these inventions and changes in fashion led to women's liberation as tailored looks improved posture and were more practical.[53]

Home decor

Home decor started spare, veered into the elaborately draped and decorated style we today regard as Victorian, then embraced the retro-chic of William Morris as well as pseudo-Japonaiserie.

Contemporary stereotypes

Modesty

"The proper length for little girls' skirts at various ages", from Harper's Bazaar, showing a 1900 idea of how the hemline should descend towards the ankle as a girl got older

Many myths and exaggerations about the period persist to the modern day. Examples include the idea of men's clothing is seen as formal and stiff, women's as elaborate and over-done; clothing covered the entire body, and even the glimpse of an ankle was scandalous. Critics contend that corsets constricted women's bodies and lives. Homes are described as gloomy, dark, cluttered with massive and over-ornate furniture and proliferating bric-a-brac. Myth has it that even piano legs were scandalous, and covered with tiny pantalettes.

In truth, men's formal clothing may have been less colourful than it was in the previous century, but brilliant waistcoats and cummerbunds provided a touch of colour, and smoking jackets and dressing gowns were often of rich Oriental brocades. This phenomenon was the result of the growing textile manufacturing sector, developing mass production processes, and increasing attempts to market fashion to men.[44] Corsets stressed a woman's sexuality, exaggerating hips and bust by contrast with a tiny waist. Women's evening gowns bared the shoulders and the tops of the breasts. The jersey dresses of the 1880s may have covered the body, but the stretchy novel fabric fit the body like a glove.[55]

Home furnishing was not necessarily ornate or overstuffed. However, those who could afford lavish draperies and expensive ornaments, and wanted to display their wealth, would often do so. Since the Victorian era was one of increased social mobility, there were ever more nouveaux riches making a rich show.

The items used in decoration may also have been darker and heavier than those used today, simply as a matter of practicality. London was noisy and its air was full of soot from countless coal fires. Hence those who could afford it draped their windows in heavy, sound-muffling curtains, and chose colours that didn't show soot quickly. When all washing was done by hand, curtains were not washed as frequently as they might be today.

There is no actual evidence that piano legs were considered scandalous. Pianos and tables were often draped with shawls or cloths—but if the shawls hid anything, it was the cheapness of the furniture. There are references to lower-middle-class families covering up their pine tables rather than show that they couldn't afford mahogany. The piano leg story seems to have originated in the 1839 book, A Diary in America written by Captain Frederick Marryat, as a satirical comment on American prissiness.[56]

Victorian manners may have been as strict as imagined—on the surface. One simply did not speak publicly about sex, childbirth, and such matters, at least in the respectable middle and upper classes. However, as is well known, discretion covered a multitude of sins. Prostitution flourished. Upper-class men and women indulged in adulterous liaisons.

See also

Time periods

Women's clothing

Contemporary interpretations

References

  1. 1 2 Breward, Christopher (1995). The Culture of Fashion. Manchester University Press. pp. 145–180.
  2. "Gender roles in the 19th century". The British Library. Archived from the original on 8 July 2022. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Steinbach, Susie (2013). Women in England: 1760–1914, A Social History. Great Britain: Phoenix. ISBN 978 1 7802 2666 8.
  4. Gernsheim, Alison (1963). Victorian and Edwardian Fashion - A Photographic Survey. New York: Dover Publications Inc., p. 26.
  5. Cannadine, David (1999). The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy. New York, New York: Vintage Books.
  6. Beetham, Margaret Rachel; A, R (2009). "Fashion Journals". In Brake, Laurel, and Marysa Demoor (ed.). Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism In Great Britain and Ireland. Gent: Academia Press and the British Library. pp. 215a–c.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  7. "Corsets, crinolines and bustles: fashionable Victorian underwear · V&A". Victoria and Albert Museum. Retrieved 27 October 2025.
  8. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  9. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 23–24.
  10. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  11. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  12. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  13. 1 2 3 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  14. Beetham, Margaret Rachel (2009). "Women's Periodicals". In Brake, Laurel, and Marysa Demoor (ed.). Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism In Great Britain and Ireland. Gent: Academia Press and the British Library. pp. 683–684.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  15. Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  16. Arnold, Janet (1993). Patterns of fashion. 2: Englishwomen's dresses and their construction: 1860 - 1940. London: MacMillan. ISBN 978-0-89676-027-1.
  17. Steele, Valerie (1985). Victorian Fashion. Fashion and Eroticism: Ideals of Feminine Beauty from the Victorian Era to the Jazz Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 51–84. ISBN 978-0-19-503530-8.
  18. Arnold, Janet (1993). Patterns of fashion. 2: Englishwomen's dresses and their construction: 1860 - 1940. London: MacMillan. ISBN 978-0-89676-027-1.
  19. Vane, Henry. Affair of State: A Biography of the 8th Duke and Duchess of Devonshire. Peter Owen, 2004.
  20. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  21. Breward, Christopher (1995). The Culture of Fashion. Manchester University Press. pp. 145–180.
  22. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  23. Audin, Heather (2015). Making Victorian Costumes for Women. Crowood. p. 45.
  24. Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  25. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  26. Goldthorpe, Caroline (1988). From Queen to Empress - Victorian Dress 1837-1877. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  27. “‘Death of the Chief Ruler of the Fashionable World’, The Ladies’ Treasury (1 April 1895), p. 274.” In Fashioning the Victorians: A Critical Sourcebook. Ed., Rebecca N. Mitchell. Dress, Body, Culture Series, gen. ed., Joanne B. Eicher. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2018. Pp. 487–491 of 565.
  28. Cunnington, Cecil Willett (1 May 1990). English Women's Clothing in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Courier Corporation. ISBN 0-486-26323-1.
  29. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  30. 1 2 Steele, Valerie (1985). Victorian Fashion. Fashion and Eroticism: Ideals of Feminine Beauty from the Victorian Era to the Jazz Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 51–84. ISBN 978-0-19-503530-8.
  31. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  32. 1 2 Matthews, Mimi (2023). A Victorian Lady's Guide to Fashion and Beauty. Yorkshire, Philadelphia: Pen and Sword Books. ISBN 978 1 52670 504 4.
  33. Breward, Christopher (1995). The Culture of Fashion. Manchester University Press. pp. 145–180.
  34. Severa, Joan L. (1995). Dressed for the Photographer. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press. ISBN 0-87338-512-8.
  35. Cunnington, Cecil Willett (1 May 1990). English Women's Clothing in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Courier Corporation. ISBN 0-486-26323-1.
  36. 1 2 Kay, Fiona; Storey, Neil R. (2022). Victorian Fashions for Women. Yorkshire and Philadelphia: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 978 1 39900 416 9.
  37. Matthews, Mimi (2023). A Victorian Lady's Guide to Fashion and Beauty. Yorkshire, Philadelphia: Pen and Sword Books. ISBN 978 1 52670 504 4.
  38. 1 2 Steele, Valerie (1985). Victorian Fashion. Fashion and Eroticism: Ideals of Feminine Beauty from the Victorian Era to the Jazz Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 51–84. ISBN 978-0-19-503530-8.
  39. Payne, Blanche (1965). History of Costume from the Ancient Egyptians to the Twentieth Century. New York, New York: Harper & Row.
  40. Cunnington, Cecil Willett (1 May 1990). English Women's Clothing in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Courier Corporation. ISBN 0-486-26323-1.
  41. "Everglades National Park". PBS. Archived from the original on 27 September 2009. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
  42. Landow, George. "Men's informal sporting dress, late 1880s and '90s".
  43. "Victorian Men's Fashions, 1850–1900: Hair".
  44. 1 2 Shannon, Brent (2004). "Refashioning Men: Fashion, Masculinity, and the Cultivation of the Male Consumer in Britain, 1860–1914". Victorian Studies. 46 (4): 597–630. doi:10.1353/vic.2005.0022.
  45. "The Colors of the Church Year". Consortium of Country Churches. Archived from the original on 13 November 2011. Retrieved 6 November 2011.
  46. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (7 September 2019). "Mourning Dress, 1894–95". The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 7 September 2019.
  47. Flanders, Judith (2003). The Victorian House. London: Harper Perennial. pp. 378–83. ISBN 0-00-713189-5.
  48. Flanders, Judith (2003). The Victorian House. London: Harper Perennial. pp. 378–9. ISBN 0-00-713189-5.
  49. Flanders, Judith (2003). The Victorian House. London: Harper Perennial. p. 341. ISBN 0-00-713189-5.
  50. Graham, P. "The Victorian Era". Digital Library of India.
  51. Shrimpton, J. Victorian Fashion. Bloomsbury Shire Publications.
  52. Aspelund, Karl. Fashioning Society. Fairchild Books.
  53. 1 2 Martin, Richard; Koda, Harold. Haute Couture. The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  54. Saillard, Olivier; Zazzo, Anne. Paris Haute Couture. Skira Flammarion.
  55. Gernsheim, Alison (1981). Victorian & Edwardian Fashion: A Photographic Survey (New ed.). New York: Dover Publications. p. 65. ISBN 0-486-24205-6.
  56. Marryat, C.B. (1839). A Diary in America: With Remarks on Its Institutions. Vol. 2. London, England: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans. pp. 246–247. From pp. 246-247: "I was requested by a lady to escort her to a seminary for young ladies, and on being ushered into the reception-room, conceive my astonishment at beholding a square piano-forte with four limbs. However, that the ladies who visited their daughters, might feel in its full force the extreme delicacy of the mistress of the establishment, and her care to preserve in their utmost purity the ideas of the young ladies under her charge, she had dressed all these four limbs in modest little trousers, with frills at the bottom of them!"

Further reading