User talk:HJ Mitchell
Add topic
| Hello and welcome to my talk page! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you; if I don't, I'll find out (or one of my talk-page stalkers might know!), then we'll both have learnt something! |
| Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious. |
- This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.
Request for independent feedback on Abhijeet Dipke draft
[edit]Hi HJ, I hope you don't mind me reaching out.
I wanted to ask for your independent view regarding an article on Abhijeet Dipke.
Dipke has received substantial international and Indian media coverage in recent months, including Reuters, BBC, The New York Times, Associated Press, Al Jazeera and several major Indian publications. Given the extent of this independent coverage, I believe his notability is worth reassessing.
At the same time, the existing article has seen repeated edits, reversions and disputes, and has been protected for edit warring/content disputes. The revision history may provide useful context: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abhijeet_Dipke&action=history
I have prepared a substantially revised draft based on the available independent coverage. I would be grateful if you could take a look and let me know whether, in your view, it meets Wikipedia's relevant notability, sourcing and neutrality requirements.
If you think the draft is sufficiently supported, I would also appreciate your advice on whether it would be appropriate to move it to mainspace through AfC, or what further issues should be addressed first.
Draft: User:Rayhan Ahmed Tamim/Draft/Abhijeet Dipke
I'm not asking you to endorse the subject or the article simply because of the amount of media attention. I would mainly value an experienced, independent assessment of whether the available sources are sufficient for Wikipedia and whether the article is presented with appropriate neutrality.
Thank you for taking the time to look at it.
The Bugle: Issue 244, August 2026
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 August 2026
[edit]- News and notes: Union process progresses, unanswered questions about Littler Mendelson remain
And Raju Narisetti leaves WMF board after nine years.
- In the media: Wikipedia editors save Sam Altman's life
Can AI do that? Meanwhile, Ruwiki gives porn the shaft, and has Grokipedia ghosted?
- Recent research: Women in blue? Wikipedia's gender gap reverses in some areas
And other new research findings.
- Discussion report: Again and Again
The community comes to consensus.
- Traffic report: Look out, here comes the Spider-Man!
Plus The Odyssey and varied topics caught in his web.
- Humour: Her tastes, her Wikimania, her upcoming tour... Baby Globe reveals everything
A short (parody) interview with Baby Globe via the French wikipress outlet, Regards sur l’Actualité du mouvement Wikimédia (RAW).
- On the bright side: The great outdoors
Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
- Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
- Special report: Paris Syndrome: Labor Strife, AI Anxiety, and a Leadership Test at Wikimania 2026
Notes from a delightful Wikimania and the ugly week that followed.
- Comix: WP:FAOWN
"Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...
Quick question
[edit]Hey HJ. Hope all is well. Just a quick question about a temp account you had blocked for disruptive editing earlier this month. You blocked ~2026-33529-06 on August 2nd and I just ran into ~2026-45018-51 who is currently active now and linked to the blocked account. The editing patterns remind me strongly of Charli 250, a long time sock master. That master locates to the same geographical location and had a tendency to revert perfectly acceptable edits only to reinstate them minutes later, seemingly the reason that first temp account got blocked. Any thoughts on this? Thanks and have a good one. Adamtt9 (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Adamtt9 I've blocked the underlying IP for a month. Let me know if they return. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:44, 26 August 2026 (UTC)
Mitchellian
[edit]Hi. What do you use to detect editwars? I use User:Polygnotus/Scripts/Editwars. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2026 (UTC)