Template talk:Israeli occupations navbox
Add topic | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this page:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Campaignbox structure not suitable
[edit]Once, the campaignbox structure is not suitable for this topic. It makes it look like a war campaign. What you should use is navbox such as Template:Arab–Israeli conflict (topics). In fact, you should just add occupations issues there, rather than standalone navbox.GreyShark (dibra) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Greyshark09: I thought about the same, but on reflection military occupation is part of war, even if unnaturally extended over decades. Onceinawhile (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Military occupation is the legal ending of the war in line with Geneva conventions, establishing temporary governance over occupied areas. Your idea here however is quite different - it deals with Israeli take over of Dar al-Islam, which is seen illegal from Islamic theology and stands for Arabic: احتلال, no matter the legal international status (temporary governance, annexation, autonomy, etc). Most of those issues are not military occupation per definition - Gaza has no military governance, neither South Lebanon ever had, State of Palestine is not military governed by Israeli Army (except Area C by COGAT), Golan is annexed. All past occupations are already described under Israeli Military Governorate and Israeli Civil Administration. Forking is not helpful, but waste of time on your behalf.GreyShark (dibra) 05:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Changed to navbox, you are welcome to play with it - much more relevant navbox than military campaignbox.GreyShark (dibra) 05:44, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Interesting idea. I much prefer the smaller version. Maybe we should have an RFC to compare the two versions? Onceinawhile (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Your are welcome to do an RfC.GreyShark (dibra) 09:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I am avoiding "war campaign" semblances by keeping it WP:NPOV, this way it is just a navbox for the articles related to the status of the situation and not just the war efforts of Israel. To be specific, the Golan Heights annexation is globally-contested and so I am replacing the link with simply "Status of the Golan Heights", this way it is NPOV and not a war campaign at all anymore. The navbox is indeed very useful for such an important topic. Best, Altanner1991 (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Navbox width query
[edit]Does anyone know how to increase the width of the default navbox display format when expanded - it is currently displaying incorrectly: see this example usage. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)