This template is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is an open question, looking for suggestions: As the number of relevant pages grows, is there a way we can order the items on each list in a more convenient or logical manner? Even I sometimes find it hard to look something up on this list/table.
I find alphabetical order doesn't work well for this kind of topic, because the spelling of transliterated names varies, and the labeling of monuments doesn't follow a particular standard (e.g. sometimes the name of the patron comes first, sometimes the word "mosque" or "complex" comes first, etc). But perhaps ordering them by foundation date, or even geographically (e.g. roughly north to south)? Or by rough order of importance (which is subjective but there are some reasonable general opinions I think)? Thoughts appreciated. If there are good suggestions, I'm happy to do the changes myself.
Casual Builder (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
