Jump to content

Talk:Subscription business model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why the original research tag is still appropriate, three and a half years after it was originally placed on the article

[edit]

Most of the article consists of statements that are not backed by citations. It reads as though someone wrote it based on their understanding of the subscription business model, and later on various editors added bits, sometimes giving citations for the bits they added. It needs to be improved by adding inline citations that support the statements made, and/or replacing statements made with statements based on reliable sources and giving citations to those sources.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Qute a lot of the statements in the 'subscriptions' and 'effects' sections can be found in the blog/article on blackcurve [1] which might be a main missing source? I have added citations to this and and cut some of the text. However, there are problems with close paraphrasing. I think further text could be replaced or removed to avoid this CP problem and perhaps then the original research tag can then be reviewed ? Richarit (talk) 11:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. BlackCurve (March 9, 2016). "The Power of Subscription Pricing". BlackCurve. Retrieved January 9, 2024.