Talk:Fire Emblem Warriors/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 01:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 20:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I didn't see the disclaimer when I first started the review. To make it up to you, I'll review the article for real this time! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:15, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

@Pokelego999 I've never seen the Famitsu scoring as 9/9/9/9. Should it be 9/10 (New 3DS)
9/10 (Switch)? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:47, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

@OpalYosutebito it should be 9/10 listed four times for each reviewer, since they are all different review scores, and often with Famitsu reviews those numbers can be different between reviewers. I've corrected it and specified that the scores are the same between both editions. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:17, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Okay. I'll get back to reviewing the articles this weekend. I've entered the Giant Panda Cinematic Universe - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:44, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm going to give it one last prose check and if I have any more concerns, I'll ping you :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:58, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

@Pokelego999 should Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon be shortened down to just Shadow Dragon? Other titles like New Mystery of the Emblem and Fates omit the Fire Emblem(:) part - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:00, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Assuming that we're talking about the series, Dynasty Warrior developers should be changed to Dynasty Warriors developers - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:03, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

I feel like this sentence could be shortened down somehow: Usuda remembered the team being worried whether the Switch would be easy to develop for, but described it as "a very easy hardware to develop for." - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:04, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

According to this source, weapons such as axes and lances were going to be gender-locked, but that changed with Lissa being a female axe-wielder (Edit: it also says that units can't change their weapon types, so sword lords like Lianna and Rowan will always be sword lords) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:08, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

@OpalYosutebito I have implemented all requested changes. On the last bit, where are you seeing this in the source? If you are referring to "we did discuss weapons during development, such as making the boy an axe user and the girl a spear user" (Based on the machine translation), this I believe is referring to Rowan and Lianna, not general genders. Unless I'm misreading this, Lianna and Rowan were the only two who were meant to have different weapons between genders; this does not seem to have been a universal thing. Additionally, Lissa's section does not mention her gender being relevant to her wielding an axe at all. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:02, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Good to know - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 11:46, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Spotcheck per section

• Gameplay
• Synopsis
  • Setting and characters
  • Plot
• Development
• Release
  • Downloadable content
• Reception
• Legacy
• Notes

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.