Talk:Aram-Damascus

incorrect cite

There is a cite for 2 Kings 11:33 ... 2 Kings 11 has only 20 lines. --Mannanan51 (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)mannanan51

This seems to have been resolved. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 23:18, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Umomium?

[Apart from Damascus,] Other cities of Aram-Damascus have not been positively identified from textual sources Then what is "Umomium" on the map? --92.214.172.206 (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

A good question. I don't know. An earlier version of the same map spells it Urmomium, which is an equal mystery. The location on the map suggests Capitolias but that article doesn't mention a connection to "Urmomium"?

it quite clearly is a pun. Your mom ium. 89.24.226.192 (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

See below. The map was a nice try for 2010, but it's untenable by now. Arminden (talk) 19:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

The map is a bad joke, needs to be removed

It has already been removed from Edom and the History of Palestine. Elsewhere it's still in use, but just. It has also been criticised elsewhere - and for many years now; we should centralise the issue, and the Edom talk-page would be as good a place as any. An overview of the discussions, with Edom first:

• Talk:Edom#:Territory: historical evolution; map deeply flawed
• File talk:Kingdoms of Israel and Judah map 830.svg
• Talk:Moab#MAP is so bad
• Talk:History of Palestine#Map of the Levant 830 BCE

Arminden (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

This map does seem to have issues, primarily that it appears to not be based on a reliable source. It's cited only to this source https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/map-of-israel-and-judah-733-bce which doesn't match. @ADeeperUnderstanding, who restored this map after it was removed recently. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

JVL is not a reliable source at all. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I removed the map and also another unsourced map. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)