RSS Amplifier

Antoinette: The World We Live In · Apr 9, 2026

The Oil Crisis

0
Sign in to vote or save

Antoinette world we live in · Antoinette: The World We Live In

The American Israeli initiated war with Iran is yet another orchestrated global dialectic. While many in Iran celebrate the demise of the Ayatollah’s truly draconian regime, the primed West protests against interference. Such international polarising is part of a globalisation strategy that cannot be buffered at a national level. It’s about applying multi-angle pressures until the people of the West call ‘enough’, and submit to a One World Order, and a one world religion under the papacy.

‘Not only the prices of commodities, but also the availability of labor can be used as the means of shock testing. Labor strikes [and designed unemployment] deliver excellent tests shocks to an economy, especially in the critical service areas of trucking (transportation), communication, public utilities (energy, water, garbage collection), etc.’ Silent Weapons for quiet Wars, (document represents the doctrine adopted by the Policy Committee of the Bilderberg Group during its first known meeting in 1954), page 25

Western governments have quietly prepared for the Iran conflict. Their Insider knowledge can be calibrated by observing them in unanimous lockstep. The prerequisite to pending lockdowns was to destroy domestic energy security. Obedient Australia reduced its eight oil refineries to two and obedient New Zealand closed down its Marsden refinery, poured concrete down gas pipes. Both nations left malleable to an increasingly controlled social order – the New Normal; code for the 4th Industrial (technical) Revolution that 2020 COVID lockdowns did not quite achieve.

‘We inherited a justice system crisis and exposed to shocks. As a result, we have been forced into making difficult but necessary decisions [let serious offender out of prison and put anti-government social media users in prison] to keep it operating’ Lord Timpson, Prison and Probation Minister for Keir Starmer’s Fabián Government

The word “shock” is code for deliberate government pressure forcing a reset of worldview and behaviour, that incrementally pulls down the prosperity of a nation. In its wake trust is broken, morale crushed and critical thinking clouded. The elite in their secret Think Tanks, inside Bilderberg, Fabián Society, Tavistock, CFR, DAVOS and others, create crisis after crisis to push the world ever closer to a new Dark Age. The elite through the United Nations migration pact that has been enacted over the last ten years has caused a cultural shock, making the vilification of Protestant Christianity possible; and now, an energy crisis, breaches national security and individual autonomy.

‘Then the response of the household to future shocks can be predicted and manipulated, and society becomes a well-regulated animal with its reins under the control of a sophisticated computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system [digital, AI]. Eventually every individual element of the structure comes under computer control through a knowledge of personal preferences, such knowledge guaranteed by computer association of consumer preferences (universal product code, UPC; zebra-striped pricing codes on packages) with identified consumers (identified via association with the use of a credit card and later a permanent “tattooed” body number invisible under normal ambient illumination).’ Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, page 11

Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, coined the phrase, don’t let a crisis go to waste. The same people who want to achieve nefarious goals, are the same people who create the crisis. Mainstream media then peddle the propaganda to the public and the politicians take the moment to introduce draconian laws – for the people’s good, of course.

The desired social change outcomes of this energy-shock is run from a central source. An ignorant worried small-visioned populace predictably look to government as their saviour. But behind the “curtain,” the saviour government is receiving mandates from the International Energy Agency (IEA). The IEA’s “timely” report, Sheltering from Oil Shocks: Measures to Reduce Impacts on Households and Businesses is a playbook on how to subdue, manipulate and control behaviour.

The attacks on Iran started on 28 February 2026, and “miraculously” 20 days later, on March 20, the IEA had drafted, published and distributed the report! On page 22 a disclaimer is written - This work reflects the views of the IEA Secretariat but does not necessarily reflect those of the IEA’s individual Member countries or of any particular funder or collaborator. But being the body that “advises” the UN, governments will use the IEA’s plan, because they do reflect the Secretariat’s views.

Very conveniently the report contains a 10-point plan to reduce energy demand. Exoterically the plan was sold to the public as prudent steps to conserve energy for the sake of national security. Esoterically, is yet another roll-out of another 10-point plan to ensnare. The question remains, will the West fall for it?

‘So what we need to look at and understand is how far does it go. Think steps ahead with all the digital identity frameworks, digital currencies, digital euro, digital payment systems. Because if people accept that your mobility can be restricted by this so-called action plan all under the umbrella and justification to circumvent and to combat the global energy shock and so on that energy use can be guided and that behavior can be shaped. Then we certainly know that this doesn’t stay temporarily. It becomes the new infrastructure, conditioned infrastructure and that’s the moment where the system is about to change.’ Energy Lockdowns Are Coming — Most People Aren’t Ready, Chris Consultant, Youtuber and consultant in the banking and IT field

Predictably, the IEA is Paris-based. It was established in 1974 on the back of the manufactured 1973 oil crisis. The IEA is a Trojan Horse setup to focus on oil supply security. However, once it was accepted by globalist governments, it expanded its mandate to include all fuels, technologies, and the global transition to net-zero emissions! Laughably, it calls itself an autonomous intergovernmental organization. But the results speak for themselves - Western countries have permanently closed down or severely reduced their energy production, destroying their sustainable domestic energy supplies and national security. The IEA claims to focus on economic development, but not apparently in Western countries! It claims to focus on the transition to faux clean energy, that keeps third world countries in poverty and causes unemployment and lowered living standards in 1st World Countries.

Coincidentally the 1970s was the decade that the United Nations stole manufacturing from the West and took it offshore to third world nations as part of the equity policies, causing an employment-shock that remains.

Although the IEA is not officially a United Nations agency, it is the backbone of the UN’s energy and climate goals, particularly through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is the EIA that drives the Paris Agreement and Kyoto Protocols and drives the UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) towards net-zero emissions targets. The IEA also drives the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). In short, the EIA (like the WHO during COVID), is not concerned with nations nor people, it is only concerned with officiating the UN Agenda 21/2030 - making it a very biased body stripped of humanity.

‘The arm of UN Agenda 21 is long and reaches into every area of the world. The Philosophy of Communitarianism pervades this plan.’ Agenda 21 is the inventory of control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals all construction all means of production, all food, all energy, all information and all human beings in the world. It is the comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, Nationally and Locally.’ Rosa Koire, former forensic commercial real estate appraiser specialising in Eminent Domain Valuation, investigator, author of ‘Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21’, 2011

As the United Nations is the shop front of the Vatican, it is not surprising that Popes, specifically Pope Leo XIV, who is building on Pope Francis legacy of world domination, promotes that people need to change their habits as part of an urgent climate action response. He propagandises the environmental crisis as a moral issue that disproportionately affects the poor. Pope Leo XIV has called for immediate, concrete action on climate change, stating there is “no room for indifference or resignation”. He criticized those who “minimize” or “ridicule” the evidence of global warming and environmental damage. The Papacy has demanded accountability from fossil fuel companies and mandates Western politicians, who are answerable to him, to act on the cry of the Earth. In line with the core Papal Mithraic belief of goddess Gaia worship.

‘In addition to living up to the commitments they have made at repeated UN MDG and SDG meetings, the G7 and G20 need to honor the commitments made in Paris to provide USD 100 billion to developing countries to help with their climate transition. As the rich countries [blessed Protestant nations] account for the bulk of the stock of greenhouse gases, it is right that they assist the countries that will suffer most from climate change and who now need to find a different energy path to that which has been at the heart of the development trajectory of the now-rich countries.’ Social Contract: Embracing a Just Technological and Energy Transition, Research Paper, PATHFINDERS for peaceful just and inclusive societies, Hosted by NYU Centre of International Cooperation, 2021, Ian Goldin, Professor of Globalisation and Development at Oxford University and Director of the Oxford Martin Programme on Technological and Economic Change, page 13

Another global document, Absolute Zero, 2019, authored by the Jesuit run Cambridge University with collaboration from Oxford University (inventor of AstraZeneca) and the Imperial College London (from where Matt Hancock delivered faulty predictive models of COVID deaths to enable lockdowns) published that the real reason for COVID Lockdowns was to meet ‘Zero Carbon Targets’. The pending energy-lockdowns in conjunction with the IEA 10-point plan is to reach that ‘Zero Carbon Target’, and in the process achieve total control of populations.

‘The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change. The alternative is that the government prohibits certain types of behaviour and regulates on production processes.’ Absolute Zero Energy Emission by 2050, 2019, University of Cambridge, (anecdotally - little Padua) page 40

If the United Nations, the Vatican, the IEA and governments really wanted national energy independence and stability, lowered cost of living and energy freedoms, 19th century innovators like Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) and Rudolf Diesel’s inventions would have been promoted. The elite do not want the plebian to have access to free and cheap energy and certainly not energy We the People can produce cheaply at home.

‘Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.’ Professor Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University

The German born Rudolf Diesel (1858-1913) lived his formative years in England spent his life innovating an engine that could run on plant oil. He had a vision to invent an engine to support farming and small businesses while reducing environmental damage. Like many men and women of the Age he witnessed the ravages of the elite choreographed 1st Industrial Revolution, that helped destroy small communities and enabled the start of Big Corporations like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil to gain unaccountable power.

At the 1900 Paris World Exhibition Diesel exhibited his engine that ran on peanut oil. It got the attention of the powerful industrialists who hijacked his plan. Diesel did not only have his invention effectively stolen, the elite stole his name as well; making the word synonymous with so called fossil fuels and dirty energy – another polarising dialectic in store for the 21st century.

In 1913 while WWI was fomenting, Rudolf Diesel mysteriously went missing in the middle of the night while voyaging on the Railway steamer SS Dresden, from Belgium to England. He was to engage in talks with the British Navy to work out a deal to power British submarines with his engine. The Vatican backed German government had offered him money for exclusive rights to his invention to be used for their submarines which he turned down.

‘Ten days later a Dutch ship came across a corpse floating in the ocean. It was in such a state of decomposition that the body, once retrieved, was returned to the sea. Though a crewman went through the pockets and found an ID card, along with a glasses case and a pocketknife. These items were later identified by Diesel’s son, Eugen, as his father’s.’ capitalremanexchange.com

Researchers and historians have spent time trying to understand how and why Diesel went overboard. Some argue suicide, while others argue he was suicided to have him permanently removed. Others argue his death was staged by the British government so he could be smuggled to Canada on grounds of a sudden acceleration in its ability to produce a successful Diesel engine for submarines. The result was the same, he effectively was erased from history in favour of elite insiders.

A mere eight-years later insider and NAZI collaborator Henry Ford released the Model T. Renewable green plant oil was discarded so that Ford could team up with Rockefeller’s Standard Oil. Their reciprocal business relationship was determined to corner the market. In 1917 the National Geographic magazine published an article by Alexander Graham Bell, the man who invented the telephone. He wrote, Alcohol was a beautiful, clean, and efficient fuel, and that we would never need to fear running out of energy as long as we could produce a crop. The reality of his words was shunned. The elite owned Big Corporations were disinterested in humanity.

In 1937, a company called Atchison Agrol Company (Agrol) had opened a production plant that blended ethanol made from American grain into motor fuel. A year later Agrol was producing 18 million gallons of plant-based ethanol per annum and had over 2,000 service stations. In 1939 John D. Rockefeller squeezed Agrol out of business. He replaced the clean running ethanol with toxic lead-based petrol.

Exxon [the largest descendant of the 1911 Supreme Court antitrust breakup of the original Rockefeller Standard Oil Trust]. spent the next 30 years funding organizations that publicly denied the science their own researchers had confirmed. Inside Climate News and Scientific American both documented this from hundreds of pages of internal Exxon memos. The company that knew the truth in 1977 chose to protect quarterly earnings instead. The same pattern repeated like clockwork every time energy independence got close. Eli Yoder

In 1944, due to rubber needed for WWII, Agrol plants were reopened, then in 1945 they were dismantled and the knowledge archived. There was to be no cheap clean homemade fuel.

But just as the contracts were awarded, Attorney General Thurmond Arnold announced that Standard had been involved in a secret, illegal pact with the German chemical company, I. G. Farben. The pact — which officials of both companies called a “full marriage” — had been signed in 1929. It was prompted by Standard’s fear that the new German process for turning coal into liquid fuel would make inroads on their worldwide markets. Standard agreed to stay out of the world chemical business and Farben agreed to stay out of the world fuel industry. The complex Standard-Farben marriage was renewed in October, 1939, when officials met secretly in the Netherlands to agree that the marriage would “outlast the war.” Standard gave Farben data on tetraethyl lead octane boosters, and Farben gave Standard the general outlines for a synthetic rubber process.’ Forbidden Fuels: a history of power alcohol, (1st published 1983), 2010, Hal Bernton, page 30

One sustainable community that is not shaken by energy-shocks is the American Amish, who make their own fuel. Any government could easily make such knowledge common place…but then there would be no energy-shocks!

‘Cornell University small farms published a detailed report on oil seed farming that includes a direct reference to Amish practice. The Amish feed sunflower meal and oil to their horses…The Amish know this plant. They have always known it. They press the seeds. They burn the oil. They feed the leftover meal to their livestock. Zero waste. The oil goes in one direction. The high protein cake goes in another. Nothing is thrown away. Nothing requires a factory or a shipment from overseas…A farmer named John Williamson at Stateline Farm in North Bennington, Vermont, has been growing oil seed crops for biodiesel since 2004. He farms 40 acres of sunflowers, canola, flax, and mustard. He built a reactor…that processes 400 gall per batch…His tractor runs on the fuel. He grows in his own fields. He does not buy diesel. He grows it and the leftover meal feeds his animals and enriches his soil.’ Eli Yoder

We the People are controlled by elite propaganda using words like depletion and sustainable and by alarming newspaper headlines such as energy crisis; all fraudulent and all for the express purpose of making money on the people’s backs. The German, Henry Kissinger (1923-2023), who held powerful positions in Washington D.C., knew the value of oil lies, and in his life time pushed to create a world price for oil.

‘South African researchers found that blends of 15 percent ethanol and sunflower oil achieved a greater thermal efficiency than diesel fuel and about 73 percent less smoke. Ethanol and other additives, such as esters, were used to cut the viscosity of the sunflower oil.’ Forbidden Fuels: a history of power alcohol, (1st published 1983), 2010, Hal Bernton, page 132

IEA energy-shock measures are not about energy control. It’s about people control.

‘So what we need to look at and understand is how far does it go. Think steps ahead with all the digital identity frameworks, digital currencies, digital euro, digital payment systems. Because if people accept that your mobility can be restricted by this so-called [IEA] action plan, all under the umbrella and justification to circumvent and to combat the global energy shock, and so on, that energy use can be guided and that behavior can be shaped. Then we certainly know that this doesn’t stay temporarily. It becomes the new conditioned infrastructure [the new normal].’ Chris Consultant Youtuber and consultant in the banking and IT field

The chances of energy-lockdowns (code for papal interdict) are high. The longer “Epic-Fury” is prolonged by Jesuit owned and run Washington D.C. and papal owned and run Zionist Israel the more empowered governments will be to justify global energy house-arrest. During the COVID lockdowns more surveillance cameras were put up, abortion and euthanasia protocols quietly became law. Lockdowns are always ruses for more top-down control and covert illicit government public-private mergers to impoverish the people.

The new normal can only win the day if the people consent to it. The government is the servant of the people. Governments make good servants but tyrannical masters. The people’s reaction to this energy-shock is being monitored to find weaknesses. This will give the elite valuable information on what “shock” is best to follow. It’s like shaking a fruit tree to see which fruit will hold and which will fall.

‘It is most interesting that, by observing and measuring the economic models by which the public tries to run from their problems and escape from reality, and by applying the mathematical theory of Operations Research, it is possible to program computers to predict the most probable combination of created events (shocks) which will bring about a complete control and subjugation of the public through a subversion of the public economy (by shaking the plum tree).’ Silent Weapons for quiet Wars, page 26

Please share this article with people you know who like this type of exposé

Read the original on antoinettejamescom.substack.com

Comments

Nothing yet. Say the first thing.

    Sign in to join the conversation.