There is no argument that Britain is a nation on her cultural knees. Although she has been a territory much desired by most European tyrants in the pay of the Rome, from Caesar to Napoleon to Hitler, it is the 20th-21st century’s slow march through her institutions that sees her a shadow of her former self.
‘I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition…’ Segment of the extreme Roman Catholic Jesuit Oath
Britannia and her “brother” Uncle Sam across the Atlantic, both once prosperous in culture, are facing the same onslaught from within, but more crucially, treasonously administered from the top. As Politics is down stream of culture, and culture is downstream of religion, it is easy to identify that her Protestant Christian heritage has been so weakened that her way of life and values have been reshaped by the political ruling class – in the pay of Rome.
‘The Cardinal (Manning, who was a Catholic first and an Englishman after) has frankly given the special reason why Rome desires to conquer England and subdue it. He says: “ If ever there was a land in which work was to be done, and perhaps much to suffer, it is here (England); were it (heresy) conquered in England, it would be conquered throughout the world. All its lines meet here; and, therefore, in England, the Church of God [Romanism] must be gathered in all its strength.” Cardinal Manning…commends the men who suffered justly for the Gunpowder Plot as true heroes, and holds them up, to the admiration of the rising generation.’ The Black Pope: The History of the Jesuits, 1871 M F Cusack (Formerly the Nun of Kenmare), page 276-277
These two nations that have brought prosperity to the world are the proverbial canary in the coal mine, and the cacophony of alarm they shriek can be heard across the globe. What the two great nations have in common, is they are Protestant Christian nations with a long history of defending themselves again papal Jesuitical intrigue.
‘Our ancient enemies have small belief in our common sense if they imagine that we shall ever be able to trust them, after having so often beheld the depths of Jesuitical cunning and duplicity. The sooner we let certain Archbishops and Cardinals know that we are aware of their designs, and will in nothing co-operate with them, the better for us and our country [Britain]. Of course, we shall be howled at as bigots, but we can afford to smile at that cry, when it comes from the church which invented the Inquisition…’ Charles H Spurgeon (1834-1892), British Baptist preacher
The West’s philosophical seat is Protestant Christianity, and it is this seat that has secured freedom of conscience for all under their auspice regardless of person spiritual affiliation. Contrary to the propaganda cultural Christianity sets people free from the winds of manipulation blowing conformity to man-made narratives, free to choose one’s spiritual expression. It gives freedom of speech, freedom to gather, freedom to associate with whoever, freedom to face one’s accusers, and freedom to the pursuit of happiness – all inalienable rights under God, not only recognised but documented into the American Declaration of Independence.
‘14. This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it…as Augustine was wont to say. When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin…Experience shows, even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty.’ Encyclical Mirari Vos, (on autonomy and religious freedom), Pope Gregory XVI, 1832
Neither Papal Europe nor Islamic East allow freedom. Freedom is historically and exclusively an ensign for the Protestant West. And this is why the Protestant Christian seat of a nation should be defended at all costs, regardless of personal spiritual belief.
‘You know this whole push of the Islamification of every aspect of our [British] society; and done purely for the sake of votes and power…We need to start talking about Christianophobia because you know if we want to use this made-up term, this media generated thing of Islamophobia, which is absolutely nonsensical…using this term Islamophobia to silence any speculation, any critique, any debate…It is the suppression of freedom of speech by defacto blasphemy laws being enacted through the back door…It’s something like eight to ten times more likely that a claim of Islamophobia will be investigated than a claim of antisemitism. And separating those two, let’s not forget at home and abroad, Christianity is the most persecuted religion on the planet…when we see a government cutting funding available for repairing churches and dishing out hundreds of millions for the protection of mosques? That shows me exactly where this political party’s agenda and loyalties lie.’ Bishop Dewar
It is papal Rome and its Islamic creation, empowered by Fabian Socialist British and commonwealth governments that are using the metaphorical poniard to incapacitate and culturally behead Britannia.
‘You know, the socialist planned a revolution and enact it against the shah. They bring in the Islamics from Arabia and surrounding areas to back them up. And the moment that they’ve [British Labour and Green Party] achieved the revolution and taken control, what happens? The Islamists turn on the socialist and executed them all [Iran in 1979].’ Bishop Dewar
Ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, who converted to Protestant Christianity before being poisoned by the Jesuits for divulging secrets, was instructed by Cardinal Augustine Bea, while at the Vatican. Rivera said The Vatican wanted to create a messiah for the Arabs, someone they could raise up as a great leader, a man with charisma whom they could train, and eventually unite all the non-Catholic Arabs behind him, creating a mighty army that would ultimately capture Jerusalem for the pope.
‘A wealthy Arabian lady who was a faithful follower of the pope played a tremendous part in this drama. She was a widow named Khadijah. She gave her wealth to the [Catholic] church and retired to a convent, but was given an assignment. She was to find a brilliant young man who could be used by the Vatican to create a new religion and become the messiah for the children of Ishmael. Khadijah had a cousin named Waraquah, who was also a very faithful Roman Catholic and the Vatican placed him in a critical role as Muhammad’s advisor. He had tremendous influence on Muhammad. [Catholic] Teachers were sent to young Muhammad and he had intensive training. Muhammad studied the works of St. Augustine which prepared him for his “great calling.” The Vatican had Catholic Arabs across North Africa spread the story of a great one who was about to rise up among the people and be the chosen one of their God. Rivera’s recollection of Cardinal Augustine Bea secret teaching to the Jesuit Order at the Vatican
The Jesuitical ideology works behind the scenes in Britain, while Islam is puffed-up to agitate and taunt the indigenous peoples of the Isle.
‘III. Let kings and princes be kept up in this principle, that the Catholic faith, as matters now stand, cannot subsist without the civil power, which however must be managed with the greatest discretion. By this means our members will work themselves into the favour of persons in the highest post of government and consequently be admitted into their most secret councils.’ Secret Instructions of the Jesuits, 1841, W.C. Brownlee, page 99
The more King Charles, a suspected Islamist, and the British government encourage the fast-widening void, civilization and all its freedoms and benefits will be abruptly extinguished. (refer to The World We Live In Substack: King Charles III: Defender of Islamic Faith, May 01, 2025)
It’s 100% true - [Islamism exploits free speech, secularism, and tolerance to weaken countries from within]. The Muslim Brotherhood stood on top of the mountain and screamed it to the entire world to hear them. And yet, of course, we all refused to hear it. By the way, it’s not just the Muslim Brotherhood who said this. They said, “We are going to conquer the West.”…To conquer the west in three ways: We’re going to conquer it through the womb of our women…most western countries right now have a fertility rate that’s well below replacement rate. And so if you’ve got Muslims who are procreating at a rate of four children a family versus you know - we’re creating at 1.3% 1.3 children per family, we can calculate what the demographic outlook looks like…Number two - we will conquer the West through hijra. Hijra is the Arabic word for immigration. And how beautiful it is when the West has decided that an open-door policy [forced by the UN] is the best way to exhibit that we are kind and compassionate. And number three - we are going to conquer the West by using your miserable freedoms against you. So they scream it loudly and we ignore it proudly.’ Dr Gad Saad, Canadian Jew, author, Blogger, Lecturer
Britain’s Protestant history, that survived the turmoil of the papal ruled Dark Ages, has been fought for and maintained for a thousand years; it is quintessentially British. Around 55AD, the Apostle Paul and a group of Christians came to Britannia and established a Christian heritage. It was followed quickly by Pope Gregory I sending Augustine to win the people to Romanism. But as history tells, Protestantism won the day and spread the Gospel to the rest of the world, without the sword.
‘The pope - Paul III - endeavored to bring his royal antagonist to terms by excommunication; but Henry defied it and its accompanying anathemas. In proportion as the passions of the pope became intensified by resistance to his spiritual authority, the measures designed to reduce England to obedience became more violent. Henry was denounced as a traitor to heaven and the [Catholic] Church and threatened with all the consequences implied by that denunciation. The pope endeavored to induce the Emperor Charles V and Francis I of France to invade England, make conquest of the country, and bring it again into obedience to him; but these monarchs feared the consequences, and prudently declined the undertaking. Disappointed in this, the pope hastened to solicit the aid of Loyola, who without delay provided Jesuits to be sent to England as spies, and to plot secretly against Henry. These emissaries were privately instructed by Loyola himself; and inasmuch as these instructions have been made known, and are admitted by the Jesuits, they serve to show the uses to which Loyola intended to put his society.’ Footprints of the Jesuits, 1894, Richard W. Thompson, page 131
Protestant nations are prosperous nations, because a middle class is encouraged to grow under its gospel. Science, medicine and technology have flourished under the Protestant umbrella after the end of the Dark Ages. No non-Christian nation has been so blessed. Protestant nations cannot boast a superior mind, but they can boast of the blessings of a superior God.
‘In William Camden’s Annals, the true and royal history of famous Impresses Elizabeth (1625) it marked the beginning of 1559, a fittingly cheeky AntiCatholic gloss to open an account of Protestantism’s Restoration in England and the final subversion of the “romish religion”’ Glaring at Anti-Christ: Anti-Papal Images in Early Modem England, c. 1530-1680, Vol 1, 2010, Adam Edward Morton, page 56
The Christian calendar once again, as it has for a thousand years, is entering into the Passover and Easter season. It is a season when the nation should be remembering God’s son who died on a cross and rose again from the grave to save mankind, releasing them from bondage and into freedom; freedom that is fast slipping away. Dr. Gad Saad asks, where does it end? Well, if The Defender of the Faith refuses to defend the faith, it could be argued that the nation of Britain has reached the end.
‘They [The Jesuits] adapted themselves to all kinds of character. With the Jew they were Jews to gain their object: with the infidel they were sceptics: to the immoral they were the most liberal, and indulgent, until they gained the absolute ascendency over them. Hence, they found their way into kings’ courts, and queens’ boudoirs. This sect have confessors to the chief crowned heads of Europe. England, France, and the Waldenses under the house of Savoy, felt this to their cost.’ Secret Instructions of the Jesuits, page 11
Yet in the middle of Lent, one brave Bishop, Ceirion H. Dewar has not sat quietly by while Easter and Britain’s Christian seat is rejected by the very monarch who took the oath at his coronation to be the Defender of the Protestant Christian Faith. Dewar is vocal and he is rallying the people.
And a lot of people in the United Kingdom, myself included, felt that because his majesty has a fascination with certain elements of Islam that there was really a leaning towards the Islamic faith or elements of it that was causing Christians significant concern because he is the constitutional head of state and constitutionally the supreme governor of the church of England. and you know the crown and the church go hand in hand in the nation. You cannot have one without the other. So, I’ve watched as things have played out over the last three years. I’ve watched as this country has seen a rapid and rapidly accelerating decline and all-out assault on Christian values, Christian traditions, Christian laws and principles, even the Christian church and the Christian faith. I’ve watched as the state church, the Church of England, has sold out its soul to allow the proclamations of false gods and false worships from its places of worship and even this week from its high altars. And when I listen to the rapidly rising Green Party that have aligned themselves with a deputy leader and Islamic men that I consider to be on the fundamentalist scale, announcing that if they win power, they intend to disestablish the church and remove Christianity as the national religion here in the United Kingdom.’ Bishop Dewar
Bishop Dewar, wrote an open letter to King Charles III that has not only inspired the people of Britain, but the whole commonwealth. If Britain falls, so does all the Commonwealth.
Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled.
Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment.
For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her.
Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them.
Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age.
Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state.
It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge.
They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled.
Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law.
Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm.
History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ.
That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity.
And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed.
The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long.
Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender.
You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours.
Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means.
They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them.
For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it.
Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted.
May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC, Missionary Bishop
As of Easter 2026, Bishop Dewar still eagerly awaits a reply. The Jesuit owned weak Monarch may wave a royal hand dismissing the letter, but his brave son, Prince William, like patriot monarchs of the past, is stepping up to the challenge of rescuing a disappearing realm.
This Easter in a Times newspaper article the Prince of Wales, stated he did have a quiet faith and recognised the Church of England as an important institution. He will need the likes of uncompromising Dewar close by, for the global narrative and agenda of the Vatican, their shopfront the United Nations and the Vatican military, the Jesuit Order will not step aside without a nation of patriots supporting the Heir Apparent.
Long live Prince William, long live Britain’s Christian culture, long live Easter!
Please share this article with people you know who like this type of exposé
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.