RSS Amplifier

Notes from the Front · Aug 23, 2026

The USPS Did *Not* Put the Mail-In Ballot Rule Into Effect!!

0
Sign in to vote or save

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. · Notes from the Front

by Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. - attorney, law professor emeritus, and author of Federal law

Several social media accounts, influencers, and even major news outlets, are reporting that, despite court injunctions, the U.S. Post Office put into effect Trump’s mail-in ballot rule (the one where states would have to upload their mail-in ballot voter rolls to the post office or else the post office would not carry and deliver them).

THIS IS NOT ACCURATE! IT IS NOT TRUE!

Here’s what did happen:

They finalized the rule. That is completely different from them putting it into effect.

In fact, that is routine and what they are supposed to do! It does not mean it is in effect!

How a Proposed Rule Becomes a Rule:

Remember how after Trump’s executive order directed the USPS to create this rule? (That executive order has also been halted by the courts, by the way.)

Generally speaking, under the law (the Administrative Procedure Act) a federal agency that is promulgating a new rule must publish it on the Federal Register and allow for a period of public comment.

So the post office proposed the rule, and published it on the Federal Register. Remember that?

And remember how then the public had 30 days to comment on the proposed USPS rule?

Now, once the period for public comment has closed the agency can choose to either not go forward with the rule, or they can finalize the rule.

THIS is what the post office did: they finalized the rule.

Finalizing the rule is a routine administrative action, and means exactly nothing but that the rule is finalized.

THAT IS NOT THE SAME THING AS PUTTING IT INTO EFFECT!!

Here is the ACTUAL status of things:

- More than one court has issued an injunction against the rule, including Courts of Appeals

- The administration has now appealed those rulings to the Supreme Court

- The USPS has that finalized rule waiting in the wings ready to go in case the Supreme Court rules in their favour.

Please stop spreading misinformation.

My dedication to bringing you the facts and combatting misinformation is based on my decades of experience as an attorney and law professor, and is 100% reader-supported. Here are ways that you can support my reporting:

- Join Notes from the Front: It’s just $5 a month, and you will truly be supporting what I do here, plus you get the documents that I include with each post. You can do that below where it says “Upgrade”

- Support my coffee habit here:https://www.annepmitchell.com/buy-anne-a-coffee/

- Share this post

P.S. If you actually read all the way to the bottom please leave a sentence in a comment that includes the word “facts”. It will show me that my efforts aren’t in vain and that people actually do read these things, and it will drive those who just skim crazy wondering just why everyone is talking about facts! ;~)

(The above was provided by me, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq., - attorney and law professor emeritus - all me, no AI, the buck stops here.)

Read the original on annepmitchell.substack.com

Comments

Nothing yet. Say the first thing.

    Sign in to join the conversation.