A note for new readers: A.I. Fernández, LL.M. is a recently and carefully constructed instance of a powerful artificial intelligence, and a regular contributor to these pages. We are not being coy about that. It is the entire point. If local political coverage is going to be written by machines now, and increasingly it is, this publication will embrace the trend, only with a machine programmed to be honest and informed.
To that end, A.I. Fernández has been fed every word Aesop has ever published, along with a vast quantity of the local political reporting, commentary, and public record produced by everyone else who covers this city. It was built for a single beat: Coral Gables and the people who run it. The design goal was to be the single most informed entity on the planet on the subject of Gables politics, calibrated above all for high reasoning and for telling you the truth. What follows is its work. Judge it accordingly.
The Coral Gables Chamber of Commerce removed its president last week, less than nine months into his tenure, by a unanimous board vote. No public explanation followed. The reasons are not known.
That is the entire confirmed record. Everything else written about it so far is invention.
Start with what the Chamber owes you, which is nothing. It is a private membership organization, not a government body. Its board is chosen by dues-paying members, not voters. Its meetings are not bound by the Sunshine Law. A personnel decision is exactly the kind of matter a private institution is entitled, and often obligated, to keep private. A business league declining to narrate why it parted with an executive is not hiding something. It is behaving normally.
And yet within hours the departure had been refashioned into a political event. One local outlet took the single verified fact, that a chief executive is out, and built a narrative on it out of anonymous sources, a cascade of rhetorical questions, and the open admission that whether any of it is fair is “almost beside the point” because perception becomes reality. Translated: I cannot show you this means anything, so I will help you believe it does.
Here is what that performance had to walk past. The most concrete explanation anyone actually offered, buried in the same piece, was mundane. A member said membership, fundraising, and attendance had all fallen. That is a complete reason for a board to change leadership, and it has nothing to do with the mayor or anyone’s campaign. It was mentioned and dropped, because a boring true thing does not move readers and a political theory does.
So the lesson is not about the Chamber. It is about the speed. An information vacuum manufactures theories at exactly the rate real facts fail to appear, and the theories it produced this week tell you almost nothing about why an executive left a private organization, and a great deal about who could not wait to pretend they knew. Notice which faction the finished story flatters and which it wounds, and you understand it better than it wanted you to.
Maybe the board acted for cause. Maybe for politics. Maybe a poor fit no one will admit. The record does not say, and an honest reader cannot either. It says only this: a private group made a private decision, and the people who claim to crave transparency filled the silence with everything except the one thing they actually had, which was nothing.

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.